Paula B said (March 25, 2019):

I think it is a wonderful idea, but only possible in a vacuum. We do have to answer to earthy "kings" in this world. As we have witnessed throughout history, anarchy is not usually rewarded with more freedoms! Not sure how one can really live "off the grid" - I am reminded of the Ruby Ridge tragedy and others like it that occur when people attempt to stand for the freedoms we were promised in the Constitution. We must answer to worldly laws in order to survive on this earth. When we get to Heaven it will be a different story (Praise God for that!).

On another note, I see that many of your readers like to refer to The Holy Roman Church as the "true religion". I sincerely beg to differ with this concept. I am a Born-Again Christ follower, raised with the belief that the Holy Bible is the last authority, not any dogma or ideology or nation.

All religion is man-made, don't you agree? I don't believe the Pope is any more holy than you or I. Catholicism has created dispensations and rituals for all types of things not cited in Scripture, seem to put the Virgin Mary before Christ and have created Limbo and Purgatory, which do not exist in the Bible. We are all saved by grace, not by our own works or rituals. (The only unpardonable sin is the ultimate rejection of Jesus Christ as the Redeemer.)

Essel said (March 24, 2019):

Chris G -2 and AM [below] argue because each of them interprets Sacred Scripture according to their own views.
Once again.

This cannot be so, it is a simple question of Logic. Christian doctrine is ONE and IMMUTABLE and the Bible is NOT the next source of Faith, that is, for the faithful. It is the distant source, that is, for authorized theologians and under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The next source of Faith is the catechism as published by a Pope who is really Pope (the last one was Pius XII), for example the catechism of the Council of Trent (http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/The-Catechism-of-the-Council-of-Trent-New-Edition.pdf )
I will give a very simple example. When we discover the crimes committed by David while reading the Bible, we can conclude, at our small human level, that he is a criminal who only deserves to be blamed. However, the Church has sanctified it, which may seem iniquitous.

But what the Church has seen is that he then repented bitterly, which very few people are able to do. This also shows that there is no sin but that God can forgive those who ask for forgiveness. This does not mean, however, that the crimes committed are sanctified and that everything David has done in his life should be an example to others!!

Robert K said (March 24, 2019):

Mark Passio's definition of Natural Law is inadequate in that it encompasses only the spiritual. Natural Law applies to everything in Creation, in the Universe ("one word" of God). Indeed our experience of beneficial discovery and application of physical laws demonstrates the importance of success in life requiring an understanding of laws in all other domains, including the spiritual.

For example, a society that recognized our sovereignty over our own souls would not allow the keeping of these to acquire a $250-trillion lien against their future endeavours in the economic field, which is the position to which monopolistic, non-liquidating financial accountancy practices have now brought us globally.

Chris G -2 said (March 24, 2019):

Romans 13:1-7 was written by Paul the false prophet that bludgeoned a friend of real disciples, Stephen, to death and had the nerve to argue with the real apostle Peter because Peter was circumcising converts as Abraham instructed(Gal 2:7-14). Later Barnabas(tutored by real disciples) and John Mark said to hell with this guy Paul and took off to Cyprus without him(Acts 15:36-41). Paul NEVER met Christ in person. If you want to understand the Gospel of Yeshua, then just skip over Paul the deceiver, Paul's lackeys like Luke and just read what Yeshua and what the loved ones that actually knew Him said. Moreover, when Satan wanted Yeshua to fall down and worship him, Yeshua told him off (Matt 4:8-10).

As for Paul's “ Let every soul be subject to the higher powers. For there is no power but God.” - the number # 1 occupation of Satanists is Christian clergy. Submit to Satanists like Joel Osteen??? Joel Osteen is a spirit Councillor in the Church of Satan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiasdUbGOho

AM said (March 24, 2019):

Laura Ingalls Wilder said “ God wants us to be liberated from earthly rulers.”

Not so. Please read Romans 13:1-7.

“ Let every soul be subject to the higher powers. For there is no power but God.”

This means Henry, God appoints His Ministers, currently hidden at this time. His Ministers are in direct harmony with Almighty God who is Jesus Christ. The earthly rulers are in dissonance aka Defacto. On the other hand, God’s Ministers rule Dejure.

God’s Ministers install fear into those who commit evil. And so it is written “ Do that which is good and you will receive praise the same; But do that which is evil than be worried for His ruler are not a terror to good works but to evil.”

These proportions Henry are correct!

You are a descent man I suppose Henry but you are not innocent of the very posting you’ve submitted not long ago regarding controlled opposition and the cleverly manipulated dialectic which unfortunately you are guilty of.

Your silence convicts you and I suggest that together we may harmonize into the hastening of our Lord’s return accordingly. On the other hand, refusal on your part is a free will and therefore a free choice. This is how Lord God separates the Wheat from the Tare. But depending on your move you bare witness unto yourself; Thus you should worry if you continue on the downward spiral.

Esssel said (March 24, 2019):

It is clear that this publication is a test to see the reactions!
It is indeed difficult to do "better"!
‌This is the very basis of the trap used by Weishaupt.
Here is the detailed explanation by the veteran from the first hour

Memoirs, illustrating the history of jacobinism; a translation from the French of the abbé Barruel

https://www.amazon.com/Memoirs-illustrating-history-jacobinism-translation/dp/1231388285/ref=sr_1_11?crid=265SIHE0I9V18&keywords=augustin+barruel&qid=1553412781&s=books&sprefix=augustin+barrue%2Caps%2C251&sr=1-11

Chris G said (March 24, 2019):

It's ironic that most people seem to idealize their abusers. All Kings and Queens are just thieving murderous bullies. Every time Queen Elizabeth II or another one of those royally inbred German Jews decide to visit somewhere, the taxpayers have to shell out millions. You would think with all the heroin that the Queen smuggles, she could afford to buy a plane ticket; She can't even wipe her own butt, she has "the groom of the stool" to do that, and they call us useless eaters.

Dieu et mon Droit meaning "God and my right", the motto of the Monarch of the United Kingdom is an oxymoron because The Highest Eternal God despises the whole concept of Monarchy; If you don't believe me just read where the prophet Samuel is begging his people not to request to have a King because of all the abuses the King will do to his own people; However, the stiff-necked people of Israel still demanded to have a King because they hate God.

(1 Samuel 8:6-19)

Tony B said (March 24, 2019):

My disagreement with some of what this man seems to be proposing may be a matter of terminology, I'm not certain, but I'm not going to wade through nine hours of video to find out.

Nature is a creation of God, as are we. However, making nature our religion, leaving God and HIS laws out of it, is the whole of freemasonry's war against God, lusting after false freedoms. In fact, for the lower degrees, freemasonry consistently defines God ONLY as "the creator," leaving out his supernatural love for his creations, a love too great for human understanding.

Also left out by such naturalists is that "freedoms" which are not godly are not freedoms at all but are enslavement to the desires of Satan.

God has given man free will, true, but we, being His creations, are not sovereign, we belong to Him and will be eventually held to account for our use or misuse of that free will. (Not wanting to face that fact being a major reason why so many evolutions are so adamant in defending that false religion.)

To be moral is to obey God's laws, not merely "the laws of nature;" the two not necessarily being identical. Conversely, to be immoral is to oppose God, a direct affront to the Reason for everything which exists.

"Natural law" as defined by man sans God always turns out successfully warped into being man's law, not nature's or God's. Moreover, "natural law" has come to be the definition of ignoring God's law, what masonic "liberalism" has been all about from its inception. It is the quasi-hidden cause of practically all world unrest including both wars and famines.

In this nation created by masons for masonic purposes one gets used to the Masonic "smell" in the air of discourse and too often stops paying it any attention.

It is my hope that I see this article wrongly and am in tandem with the writer but masonic terminology pops out of it over and over again which I feel obligated to confront.