Bushfire Crisis: The De-Kulakization of Australia (1)
January 2, 2020
"The independent farmer , the small irrigators and farming communities, ... the Boer, the Kulak is always the prime target of the Communist Revolution."
(See note below article for
explanation of ""de-Kulakization")
"In the face of this ecocide, the UN 'climate change' mantra is again invoked by our overseers as the cover story for a tragedy that has nothing to do with carbon emissions and everything to do water rights, sale of water rights by government, frack well drainage, floodplain harvesting and tax-payer subsidized private dams of multi-national agribusiness."
The Australian brush fire crisis is Biblical and Apocalyptic. The human impact is heart-rending. The heroic efforts of ordinary Australians to save others, to save property and protect the land is legendary.
The devastation of the land cannot be put into words. When the fires have swept through all that is left are a few of the healthiest native trees that survive bushfires, the trees that require bushfire to regenerate.
And guess what? After the fire sweeps through, Local Government Authorities (LGA) are on the scene to clear any surviving vegetation as "hazard reduction."
(Max Igan at 6.15 in The Crowhouse video "Australia - Wake Up or Die! - Make This Viral") https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBsFVn-kKV8
Now, before the fires, it was a crime for property owners to clear fireload and engage in hazard reduction. But once they have swept through and the land is down to mineral earth, then the LGA comes and clears what's left? Am I the only one out there in TV Land who thinks this is completely bizarro mundo?
This is the first of many WTC-7 Effects that should provide the first clue.
Something very Agenda Driven is happening with these bushfires. This is a lot more than not letting a good crisis go to waste.
In this context, only a complete wonk will be wondering about Australian water rights and asking questions like: Have they perhaps been sold to the People's Republic of China by the government of corporate Australia?
THE SIX YEAR DROUGHT
I raise this question because these fires have their origin in the Big Six Year Drought - now in its seventh year. This drought has been geo-engineered. It is not due to CO2 emission driven climate change as per UN dicta.
The climate hasn't changed in terms of the amount of water coming down across the North in the annual monsoon. As Max Igan notes in the above video "that happens every year like clockwork". However, the climate is changing because the Great Artesian Basin , which feeds the aquifers of the entire continent, is being drained of its annual monsoonal waters. As the continent becomes more dry, the temperature rises and entire river / forest ecosystems which depend upon the Great Artesian are dying out.
The floodplains of the Great Artesian are being harvested by the frack wells of mining companies extracting coal seam gas. There are 43,000 frack wells in Australia and most of those wells are in the Great Artesian. From 2 - 8 million gallons of water are required to frack a coal seam gas well in a single operation. And a well may be fracked many times. These are the companies which have frack wells in Australia.
The draining of the Great Artesian is producing climate change, but it is climate change due to geo-engineering by corporate interests.
Then there are the multi-national agribusinesses of the Murray Darling Basin. The aquifers of this river system draw upon the Great Artesian and so have a lower volume to draw down due to the frackwell drainage in the North. Max Igan continues: "None of the farmlands south of this area [designates the Murrumbidgee] are getting water through their river and creek system because all of the water is being siphoned off to dams that are privately owned by mega agricultural companies and mega mining companies using this water" for private operations.
So, beneath the frack well drainage in the North, we have the floodplain harvesting in the South.
In the face of this ecocide, the UN 'climate change' mantra is again invoked by our overseers as the cover story for a tragedy that has nothing to do with carbon emissions and everything to do water rights, sale of water rights by government, frack well drainage, floodplain harvesting and tax-payer subsidized private dams of multi-national agribusiness.
Maryanne Slattery, senior water researcher for the Australia Institute states , "This is not an issue of "agriculture vs. the environment". The issue is the public interest vs. entrenched political and bureaucratic interests."
She cites ABC Four Corners : "Cash Splash - Taxpayer Dollars , Secretive Deals and the Lucrative Business of Water" which went to air in Australia July 8, 2019.
'Recovery of environmental water' in the public interest is firmly in place as the cover story for the subsidized irrigation grants and programmes under the Murray Darling Basin Plan, the Plan that has virtually killed the Darling River.
Naturally, the lion's share of these subsidies go to multi-national agribusiness.
In the interest of the public stake, we are left to ponder that 'recovery of environmental water' from these programmes equals about zero. The creative accounting for the MDB Authority computer model seems to deal only in the evaporation figures.
Also in the Four Corners report we also hear from graziers and small irrigators who have been 'exited' by Murrumbidgee Irrigation ( MI ) from water infrastructure to allow for Webster Ltd expansion. At 32.08 "On the Dry Hay Plains of the Outer reaches of the Murrumbidgee Valley [where the Murrumbidgee River meets the Murray River ] , MI has removed an entire district of 'shareholders' from its network of channels."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s83UuhDxT_Y "Cash Splash : Taxpayer Dollars , Secretive Deals and the Lucrative Business of Water" Uploaded by ABC News in Depth. July 8, 2019.
An entire district! Now we know what is going on here.
As the Big Six Year Drought has morphed into a national bushfire emergency across three states - the Political Theatre will become increasingly important as an arena in the battle for hearts and minds.
The Morrison government clearly has the Doofus script. They are the climate change deniers and they are sticking to the 'Nothing to See Here' story with specific comments which cast them in the role of the Bad Doofus. Belittling volunteer firefighters has to be a new low in any Political Theatre. The Morrison suits are being scripted to make 'climate change denial' as horrible as possible in the eyes of Australians going through terrible ordeals.
Then there are Bolsheviks and Trotsky-ites, together with the NGOs on the Soros Payroll Clearly these actors have the Good Goy script. They are busy cloaking this catastrophe in the 'UN climate change' mantra and they are 'on message' and 'on point' with the NWO solutions to our problems.
So, of course, they are calling for the UN climate change dicta and its proposed legislation that will address the crisis we are having here. That would be the firestorms for which government (all Masonic political parties) in cahoots with international corporations are in large measure directly responsible.
Meanwhile, back on the Money Trail. In the course of the Big Six Year Drought - we have Olam International (a Singapore Company) selling permanent water rights in Australia for $452.7 mil. to Canadian company PSP. And where did they get those rights? Well. The Australian government $89 mil water sale to Olam of Singapore.
And how many other companies are selling permanent water rights and how did they acquire these assets in the first place?
In Australia, there is no Centre or conservative party. In Australian politics, anyone to the right of Chairman Mao is an extremist.
So the public is supposed to listen to the Good Goy script of the Communists and the Soros Payroll and blame the ecocide of the Darling River, the Big Six Year Drought and now the national bushfire emergency on carbon driven climate change, fossil fuels, CO2 respirators, cow farts, Australia's carbon footprint - the size of a Yeti and the Dark Side of the Force.
But the independent farmer , the small irrigators and farming communities , in point those 'exited' from the Murrumbidgee by Murrumbidgee Irrigation, the Boer, the Kulak is always the prime target of the Communist Revolution. And these would be the targets of the MDBA and its MD Basin Plan.
Manifestly and objectively, there is a Plan. In terms of its stated objectives - clearly it is not working. The waters are being harvested and conserved. For Whom? For Whom exactly is the Plan working? It is obviously working for someone because they have gone to a lot of trouble to cloak their interests.
De Kulakization - The term is now being used as a term Hybrid Warfare - usually wars conducted upon populations by their government. It derives from Stalin's Five Year Plan which was specifically and publicly announced for the 'liquidation' of class enemy. The military was used against the Ukrainian Kulaks in the Five Year Plan - for example grain raids and executions on the land. This term is now being used for - the state sponsored terror against the Boer farmers by the Marxist gov't of SA and often referred to as De-Kulakization. Drought, fire and removal of water are being geo-engineered in Australia. And this is for the removal of people from their properties. The removal of water for an entire district of Australian farmers is, I believe, another example of De-Kulakiztion. And this policy continues with provisions for military intervention in the planning of Local Government Authorities.
Part Two tomorrow.
Related ---Overview of Australian Inferno
------------- Australian Adept Unveiled World Satanic Control
-------------------- Australians tell PM to Piss Off
First Comment from WF
Groundwater theft/waste is a critical issue, but the lack of rainfall is the elephant in the room. Chemtrails over Sydney region for example are having an obvious hygroscopic effect: the rain clouds keep trying to form and the high altitude aerosol particulates -- which the Australian military certainly know about -- keep stopping their formation. The best evidence for this is the Bureau of Meteorology itself. Whenever it predicts rain, say in five days time, one can observe a fixed pattern: the precipitation is gradually 'downgraded' as it draws closer to the day. It is never the other way around (unexpected rain), so the counterargument of meteorology being an 'imprecise science' is invalid. We can literally observe in the weather chart a 'contingent factor' skewing the conventional science of meteorology.
Australian's have their faults, like any people, but their balance of head and heart is near perfect. Moneyed-corporate trash (like Fozdyke) don't get it. The world will not be a better place without a strong and free Australia.