religion, i.e. the way to find unity with God. (Orgasm was sold as a mystical experience.)
Jack Hamilton describes the effect this satanic indoctrination had on his life.
Non vi e' un problema della coppia: vi e' il problema di un uomo e il problema di una donna. e non vi 'e che una soluzione: La morte. There is no problem with the couple: there is the problem of a man and the problem of a woman. and there is only one solution: death. From the Italian film Hitch-Hike, 1977
Oh gods, what power you have given beauty! La clemenza di Tito, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Is that you Bertie? I love you, though you destroy me. The Makropoulos Case, Act II, Leos Janáček
by Jack Hamilton
There once was a young glamour goddess who favored red lipstick and high heels. She drove her young man around town in a borrowed 1947 convertible. Life was good. They married, had me, and then she drove him out his mind with a lifetime of contention.
At 65, my father told me he couldn't take it anymore, he'd give her half the money and leave. Six months later he died, congestive heart failure. He never got out of the house, just too sick, too weak. His will to action was gone; his dream of freedom and dignity went with it.
My mother broke his heart, literally, over time. Their last great battle was about their daughter, my sister. My mother hated sister's husband, and my father, peace-loving, wanted to reconcile. It became academic, later, when my sister divorced him, but not before moving to California to be with her new online boyfriend, himself divorced.
At 18, I set out to get my very own goddess vis-à-vis this dystopic domestica. But do it right. I got myself a "good girl" type goddess, no red lipstick though she did wear heels.
Over time, I came to find out my "good girl" wasn't really. She hid her devious nature, repressed her simmering resentment against her protective father and then eventually transferred the animus to me, expressed in myriad ways.
"Good girls" don't flaunt their badness like the "bad girls" (you'll recognize these as film noir types), they cover it up, even from themselves. They believe they are led by God, not Satan. They want you to believe, too.
This "goodness" is an illusion. For some, takes a lifetime to pierce....
Humans crave truth; we give and get illusion. The best male self wants a collaborating female to bind with, to conquer the world with, one who looks to God, then him, versus Satan.
My best male wants to reward her for her partnership. Instead, she foregoes, chooses resentment, "feminism." She chooses rebellion, which is as the sin of witchcraft.
We get a secret agent who works for Satan and doesn't even know it. Hollywood facilitates. It is the ultimate illusion manufacturer, the greatest of all time. Hollywood molds your mind with "story."
You, me, hopelessly brainwashed by "the story," which we believe, consciously or subconsciously: Women are goddesses, high above men.
Men can't live without women, i.e., sex. Goddess union through sex/love is the only goal of life.
The goddess/wife/girlfriend is your rightful object of worship, your one true God, your purpose, your raison d'être, your present, your future, your sole salvation.
There is only one such goddess, a "soulmate," for you. If you have attained this "love" state with a goddess, with your soulmate, you have succeeded in life. If you haven't, you failed.
You must never, ever be without a woman. If you are without "love," through death, divorce, break-up, other, you must immediately embark on a quest to attain or replace same.
Taken together, this "story" gives the woman license. Weak male, intoxicated by beauty or sex or Hollywood or perfume or all of the above, and it means Adam is back eating apples.
So, this sounds very cynical, you say. Do you, Mr. Author guy, dislike all women? No, emphatically no. Generally, women are much nicer than males, and often smell better. What I am saying is this: do not make the male-female relationship your religion.
And be careful who you pair with. The modern woman seems nice on the outside, but is dangerous on the inside because she has been tricked and trained to resent, oppose and eventually destroy the male, rather than assist, since Eden.
Indoctrinated by dark forces that say they should lead and instruct men, modern women are incensed! by the prospect of a co-pilot role. They must be no. 1, you, no. 2 or lower. Some get pegged at 19 on the depth chart.
When Adam relinquished his responsibility to follow God to Eve, man, and mankind was lost.
Men must reclaim responsibility, lead (if opportunity presents) in a loving way, and not submit to a role you weren't intended for. Your purpose is not to worship a woman, but to connect with God, the Creator, and become a functioning follower, and make the trip from here to eternity, and not get off your means of conveyance for any reason. Courtship, romance, marriage and sex are not forever.
Freely adapted for this page from his new book: Goddesses and Demons: How Women Destroy Men and How to Defend Yourself, by Jack Hamilton. He also wrote False Flags, State Secrets, Government Deceptions: A Short History of the Modern Era. Both at Amazon.
First Comment from Barry-
Male / female relationships are breaking down because the rulers of this planet are making it so. We have received so many false messages through the education system, the controlled media and so called "entertainment" industry it has become impossible to makes sense of anything. Children need to see good working models to copy, but instead they see a tangled mess of dysfunctional relationships. Is it any wonder that young adults conclude marriage is not for them? Of course this has been done by design. The elites have a plan for a future society in which close emotional relationships do not fit. It's called a technocracy or scientific dictatorship. Agenda 30 on sustainable development is the Trojan Horse disguising this evil plan to enslave humanity. The key word is "sustainable." This ambiguous word will allow experts to issue diktats on just about anything. Rule by pure logic may sound appealing to some people, but eventually it will lead to a Soylent Green future in which experts decide that burying the dead is a waste of perfectly good protein.
The following quote has been attributed to George Brock Chisholm: "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." I cannot verify the source, but nevertheless we can see it happening. Marriage, religion and the nation state are all under attack from the globalists. Recently at the opening of the UK Parliament, the Queen announced that "environmental principles are to be enshrined in law" If she is referring to Agenda 30 I'm afraid we are in big trouble. Another danger looming on the horizon is the inevitable financial crash caused by irresponsible quantitative easing, a process that has been going on since 2008. Predicting the timing of the crash is difficult, but estimates say it could happen following the presidential election in November this year. So let's connect the dots. This looks like the very same script that played out in the 1930's. First a huge financial crash throwing millions into poverty and secondly the solution - global technocratic governance. I wish I had the answer to these problems. The best I can offer is to repeat the words of the late Jim Tucker, "only an informed public can stop these people"
Your story today made me angry, though it has some truths, but.... Men no longer respect or value women's as nurturers of children and bringers of life. Women worry about their children 24/7. That's quite a job.
As Feminism put Christian women into the fantasy of workplace and achievement empowerment, hence crumbled their societies. No wonder women resent men, as men place no value on women but as sex objects and financial co contributors. They will never take a stand to defend us. Of course men then become less respected and deeply resented.
How can families be truly loving and societies cohesive with this resentment brewing, amidst the noise of false beliefs attained from television and social engineering. All women want and need a leading man.
Diane: You are led to believe these things about men through pop culture and popular media, which is the point of Henry's article. You cannot expect men to defend or protect your idea of a relationship (a fantasy engendered by narrative), but rather a commitment to a partnership. Commitment is a two-way street. Partnership is an evolving process. Love, nurturing and unconditional respect are what men need, in addition to what children receive (when they are parented well), in exchange for the security they provide. These days, a lot fewer people understand what commitment means, let alone what it entails in a world of instant gratification and endless virtue signalling.
To give you a good example of what commitment and partnership mean in terms of proper gender roles, this interview with the late Russell Means and his wife Pearl is amazing,
and something you won't find amid western cultural memes and ridiculous identity politik. Notice how the best attributes of the strong man and the strong woman complement one another. The man and woman are not in competition, they are in true partnership. This is certainly what I seek - and will find through the Universal Laws of attraction, intention, allowance and balance - as I am now in my late 40s (I am previously married). I simply refuse to subscribe to the nonsense society's so-called "influencers" have foisted upon us. You might consider a similar approach.