Direct Link to Latest News


Lockdown Calamity Based on Bogus COVID 19 Tests

September 27, 2020


Aside from using an unreliable PCR test, 

why aren't health officials cycling at a lower rate

 to eliminate people who are actually healthy 

but have a tiny inactive amount of virus or 

other common coronaviruses in them?

 Did you know that cases of regular cold or flu are considered COVID-19?

Ten Questions must be asked.

by Frank B


The PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19  is faulty and unreliable.

The PCR method (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was never meant as a diagnostic test, it doesn't detect the virus or viral load and is unreliable due to high false-positive results according to its inventor Kary Mullis. So, why is it being used?

A recent article in the New York Times said that 90% of positive cases could be eliminated by lowering the rate of cycling

"The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.

This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.

Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.

Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from an infection that pose no particular risk -- akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, said Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found."

So here are some questions that should be asked:

1. At what rate of cycling using the PCR test is your department of health cycling at? 37-40 is sure to be positive but not for an active infection.

2. Are you aware that positive antibody test results are quite often considered a case? (meaning an individual had CV-19 at some point, they've developed antibodies to it and are now healthy.)

3. How many of these cases are actually an active infection and are symptomatic and how many are not?

4. Why are asymptomatic individuals aka healthy people, who have tested positive considered a case, when the probability of infecting another person is very rare according to the WHO?

5. Why are probable and presumed cases, individuals who were never actually tested, in most cases, not listed to the media as such?

6. How many cases are from contact tracking and tracing? Again probable and presumed cases. One case plus possibly fifteen contacts equal sixteen cases without testing!

7. Did you know that cases of regular cold or flu are considered COVID-19?

From the CDC (which has since been changed):

Are you aware that individuals who died with, and not of COVID-19 are included in COVID-19 death case counts in many instances?

8. How many people who died and weren't tested, were considered COVID-19 death cases? What did they actually die of?

9. How is it that this virus is so unlike other cold and flu viruses that have a 3-6 week life span? How can COVID-19 be the same virus from last Winter/Spring?

10. Why are we still concerned about a virus that peaked in April (in deaths)


How can your government and government health authorities mandate any such lock-downs, quarantines, mandatory mask-wearing, anti-social distancing, forced vaccination, police state crackdowns and various totalitarian restrictions based on mainly bogus cases and not deaths? 

Let alone whether this virus is the cause of infection in the first place!

It is up to us to call out this so-called pandemic and virus for what it is - a HOAX. Use this information to inform them that we are not buying their ridiculous propaganda, ever-changing narrative, statistics/numbers game, and continuous erosion of our rights and freedoms any longer.

more background from Frank

There are few deaths worldwide from COVID-19 when compared to the regular cold and flu seasons. According to the CDC in the US only 6% of COVID-19 deaths were strictly from the virus, and the other 94% were of advanced age with 2-3 comorbidities!

Then, take into account that 80% of people who contracted the virus say it was mild or they didn't even know they had it and that the virus has a 99.+ recovery rate.

Then take into account that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19 has never been purified/isolated, never met Koch's postulates or a gold standard. These tests are essential for determining whether a potential virus is the actual cause of infection.

Everyone should be asking - What's going on? This madness is not about a virus.

It's about an agenda, used in conjunction with the climate change agenda, to control the masses, and make sweeping changes to our way of life, restricting our rights and freedoms to further the cabal's - Great Reset aka New World Order.

A letter-writing campaign is in order. This is a callout to everyone to send off letters/emails to their government/private health officials, school boards, media, elected government officials demanding them to be transparent and explain to us just what these COVID-19 cases actually are.

Why all the fear-mongering? Why the deception? I'm sure many individuals who are pushing this fear campaign are unaware of the nefarious intent of the cabal or what cases actually are. It is to these individuals, that these questions are mainly directed at.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Lockdown Calamity Based on Bogus COVID 19 Tests "

JG said (September 28, 2020):

This is a controlled experiment which is about duping the masses into submission by way of misinformation and fearing mongering.
More people are catching on and more governors are easing their restrictions. To counter their reaction the MSM is starting to crank up the misinformation and fear mongering campaign once more with hopes to keep them "in line" with the program.
I don't believe they can keep this game going on much longer because sooner or later the money will run out. The bankers aren't going to be financing this fiasco forever.

GB said (September 28, 2020):

FS correctly amplifies, what the PCR inventor, has himself stated, namely that, this so-called test, was never intended as a “TEST”. It is rather, a laboratory procedure, which if cycled enough times, yields, misleading data.

THEY are using this raw and misleading data, to befuddle the masses. We are being led down the proverbial garden path, to believe, that the PANDEMIC, is back. Low and behold, the CASES NOW, are rising and rising. More MASKS, fewer people to assemble, more lockdowns, more job losses.

Yet, the sheeple, passively believes, all that is feed to them, without even a whimper. Last Saturday, 09.26.2020, at the rally against such madness, as I marched down by our Parliament buildings, chanting” OUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US”, some cars, maybe 5%, flipped us the finger. I waved at them, begging them to reconsider my, INFORMED opinion. They had such contempt for us, for trying to enlighten them, for trying to inform them. We are marching for you as well, don’t you know it! DO YOU NOT KNOW THAT. To be fair, there were more cars that honked at us in approval, with thumbs up. This was most heartening, and we all bitterly cheered in delight.

There are many good people, expending their time and energy, trying, to enlighten you, to the TRUTH. At least listen.

When this is over, and determined, what side of the fence willing you be standing on. What side of history, will you be identified with. What will you say to your children and grandchildren, who have been either sterilized or crimpled by vaccinees! I wonder.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at