Direct Link to Latest News


Environmentalism is Euphemism for Genocide

April 1, 2021

Genocidalists Julian Huxley, Princes Philip & Bernhard
Huxley would be taking his life into his hands if he openly called for eugenics, so he called the movement instead environmentalism.

Genocide is a Keystone of Globalism

"I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil."

Unless we put a stop to the plans of Prince Charles and his friends, the physical economy will be torn asunder, and a genocide, perhaps several times greater than Hitler's, will ensue....The Green New Deal is a carefully crafted vehicle for radical population reduction, with almost no real concern about the environment. 

This article appears in the March 26, 2021 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

by Richard Freeman
(abridged by

Britain's Prince Charles, BlackRock investment advisors, and the financiers of the City of London and Wall Street, are implementing, at great speed, a green genocide program called the Great Reset, or the Green New Deal. 

Under the clothing of environmentalism, it would implement radical population reduction; a shutdown of agricultural-manufacturing production; and the building of a $40 trillion green speculative bubble, all implemented through a central bankers' dictatorship.

On cue, the witless President Joe Biden issued two very important executive orders--EO13990 and EO14008--within the first week of taking office, and other programs were brought up, such as the policy paper, "Making Mission Possible," to realize the Green New Deal.

This is being activated at a furious pace that few people actually see.

Unless we put a stop to the plans of Prince Charles and his friends, the physical economy will be torn asunder, and a genocide, perhaps several times greater than Hitler's, will ensue.


The way to understand the Green New Deal is to understand its history, and its intent. It did not arise out of the thin blue sky. 

The Green New Deal was not assembled in 2017, as the media often dishonestly and profusely report. Rather it is the culmination of a 75-year project. The Green New Deal is a carefully crafted vehicle for radical population reduction, with almost no real concern about the environment. 

The genocidalists who assembled the Green New Deal, and its offshoots, believe that only the super-wealthy, the upper three or four percent of the population, are fit to live; they regard the other part of the population, the 96 percent, as, in the words of the Nazis, "people whose lives are not worthy to live."

In 1946, Julian Huxley, called for the revival of the Nazi policy of eugenics, only one year after World War II had ended. In the same year of 1946, Huxley had created and appointed himself director of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). In the statement stating UNESCO's purpose, Huxley wrote:

The dead weight of genetic stupidity, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest possible care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.

In 1946, the issue of eugenics was highly charged. Even though Huxley put it into UNESCO's policy statement, he would be taking his life into his hands if he called for eugenics as a movement openly, so he called the movement instead environmentalism.

As for Prince Philip, in the foreword to a 1987 book [by Fleur Cowles] called, If I Were an Animal, he wrote in response to human population growth, "I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a deadly virus."

Princes Philip and Bernhard, along with Huxley, created the World Wildlife Fund as an organization command center for what would become the Great Reset. They deployed Philip's son Charles for this purpose.

Prince Charles' power derives not from himself, but comes from his location in an institutional arrangement amongst the monarchy; the City of London, Wall Street, and other financial centers; the Bank of England; and MI5, MI6, GCHQ--the intelligence centers. I want to emphasize that there are other forces as well.

In the early 1990s, Philip et al. deployed Charles to help set up and direct the agenda of the Earth Summit, which was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. 

I will only report on two features. The summit was an extravaganza with more than 100 heads of state and 38,000 people in attendance. The first feature is that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change previously had reported on climate change as both natural and man-made. 

At the Rio summit, it only reported henceforth that climate change was man-made. Second, it laid out sharp reductions in greenhouses gases; the reductions were made mandatory at the Kyoto summit five years later in 1997. The Rio Earth summit became the precedent for all future UN environmental summits held every five years....

If Executive Orders 13990 and 14008, now signed by President Biden, are implemented, they will cripple America's agricultural and industrial capacity and destroy its ability to make breakthroughs to next levels of development.


The situation has intensified as the British attempt to impose the Great Reset/Green New Deal upon a willing Biden administration, making the United States the leading model for this program globally. 

Biden and his Special Envoy for Climate, former Secretary of State John Kerry, are working at a frenzied pace. They are adopting policies, by executive orders, that would, by design, significantly undermine America's agricultural and industrial physical capacity and assets. This would threaten the nation's human existence.

On January 20, a mere few hours after having been sworn in as President, Biden signed Executive Order 13990. In a simplified explanation, all federal, state, and local levels of government are required by law to evaluate each new potential infrastructure or other project on a cost-benefit analysis basis, in which the benefit is supposed to be greater than the cost. What Biden's EO13990 does, is it would make mandatory that "social costs of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases" are made part of the cost-benefit analysis...

The good news is that on March 8, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and the Attorneys General from 11 other states, filed suit against Biden's Executive Order 13990 in the Eastern District of Missouri, saying:

[It will] inflict trillions of dollars of damage to the U.S. economy for decades to come. It will destroy jobs, stifle energy production, strangle America's energy independence, suppress agriculture, deter innovation, and impoverish working families.

As for Biden's EO 14008, it is sweeping. It's going to direct the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to report on the security implications of climate change. So, it's now shifting climate change into a central policy in every agency, including our Defense Department and the intelligence services. 

Executive Order 14008 ... will take out of use 30% of federal lands and 30% of federal waters from any form of energy development or use for productive purposes like agriculture.

Lastly, we briefly consider a policy paper called, "Making Mission Possible," produced by the London-based Energy Transitions Commission. The report appears to set the ground to heavily reduce the production and use of aluminum, cement, and steel, because allegedly their production involves the production of too much greenhouse gases that could lead supposedly to higher levels of global warming...

If you took those three elements out by themselves, you could not build infrastructure, you would not have manufacturing, you would not have agricultural implements. 

Kill off significant sections of agriculture, as Biden's executive orders would do, and the economy is blowing out, and human existence plummets, setting the stage for the 75-year-old project run by Julian Huxley, Prince Charles and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, for the radical reduction of the population. But it is the same condition in most nations of the world with the exception of China, and positive sections of Asia.

The lawsuit filed by the Attorneys General of 12 states indicates we have tremendous openings, if we seize them. We can bring the Green New Deal completely down, and move into the world of the Belt and Road Initiative.
Thanks to John B!


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Environmentalism is Euphemism for Genocide "

Andrew said (April 2, 2021):

Environmentalism is Euphemism for Genocide and so is Racism.

What is environmental racism?

"Poisoned tap water in Flint, Michigan. Toxic waste dumps in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. A town in China where 80% of children have been poisoned by old computer parts. What do these things have in common?

All are examples of environmental racism, a form of systemic racism whereby communities of colour are disproportionately burdened with health hazards through policies and practices that force them to live in proximity to sources of toxic waste such as sewage works, mines, landfills, power stations, major roads and emitters of airborne particulate matter. As a result, these communities suffer greater rates of health problems attendant on hazardous pollutants."

Doug P said (April 1, 2021):

The green ideas of windmills, solar farms, and electric cars are terrible for the environment and every engineer or scientifically educated person knows this, and it's true by at least an order of magnitude. People in high school are quite capable of understanding this. The professional class is smart and clever but you won't find a drop of wisdom in all of them combined. They haven't been trained for it and they have been trained hard.

They have been trained to not ask questions and to overlook things. They are exactly what CS Lewis said they would be "clever devils".

I don't believe that they will have any reason to keep the professionals around and I honestly don't think any of us will survive, including the politicians and TV personalities. The idea of honor among thieves is oxymoronic.

If almost everyone is dead, what do you do with your Rockefeller doctors? It would be generations before anyone needed to build cars or homes again if there is a small number of survivors.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at