Direct Link to Latest News


Eric Peters - Are You Hypochondriac or Heretic?

April 29, 2021

"It is a strange thing to be an unbeliever in these times of near-universal sickness. Or rather, near-universal obsession with getting sick."

Makow - Western society has been inducted into a satanic cult, Cabalist Judaism (Freemasonry, Communism) which controls and exploits its members by corrupting and making them sick.

by Eric Peters

People are weirdly proud of having been Jabbed; they are dying to tell you all about it.

And they may well be, just that.


Many already have. Thousands, actually. Many of them previously healthy.

Which, naturlich, the media won't tell the public about - at least, not over and over and over again, as per the cases! the cases! Of positive tests.

That you can't get them to stop telling the public about.

It used to be old people in nursing homes who only talked about their ailments - and procedures: Their hip replacements, diverticulitis surgery and various meds. But sickness-obsession has become a national cult and its members are of all ages and both sexes - bound as one by their held-in-common hypochondria.

Holy achoo!

Without the "bless you."

It is a strange thing to be an unbeliever in these times of near-universal sickness. Or rather, near-universal obsession with getting sick.

It brings home what one read about what it was like to be a Catholic in Henry V's England - or a Protestant, when his daughter Mary took over.

They didn't wear their sickness on their faces in those days, of course. But it was the same sickness, nonetheless. A belief so fragile it required everyone else share it. Lest the sight of an unbeliever cause one of the Faithful to waver.

The Jabbing is of a piece.

The Jabbed are not content to merely be Jabbed, themselves. Which suggests they doubt, at some level. As they also doubt with regard to the wearing of their Holy Rags. If both served the purpose purported, they would not be so worried about those who do not share their Faith.

They are saved - or are they not? Why doth the Pope - Fauci XVII - wear the Rag? Hath he not received the Jab and - thus - put on the full armor of god? Or is it that he dreads the spread of Unbelief?

What's going on - with regard to both the Holy Rag and the Holy Needle - is the same thing that went on in Jonestown in '78 and in San Diego, back in '97 - when "Do" and his Faithful ate their pudding and "ascended to the level beyond human."

There was no getting out of line - in Jonestown. No turning down the cup of Kool Aid. Everyone took a drink. If some did not - if some were allowed to not - then it is likely not as many would have.

Same thing now.

People seem to feel better when others share their fate. Put more finely, some people seem to take a malignant delight in making sure others share their fate. A good example of this being the way some people will squeal on anyone they know has not paid "their fair share" of taxes - or wriggle with delight when hearing they were punished for that.

The Unfaithful as regards the Face Diaper have been getting this treatment for nigh on a year now. It is not enough for those who wear the Diaper to wear it. Others - everyone - must also wear it. Must share in the degradation and submission, the propagation of a lie held in common.

It makes the Diapered feel better about the lie they suspect but dare not admit to themselves they fell for.

Just so, the Needling. Those who have been Jabbed resent those who have not been Jabbed and want them punished for their "vaccine hesitancy." Want them pressured to be Jabbed, as by their employers giving them the "choice" to be Needled or be unemployed. As by internal passports - and not just for travel, either. As with Diapering, Needling - proof thereof  - will become the necessary act of submission (Islam!) to their Faith.

But it shows how rickety their Faith is. How little they actually believe.

This does, however, make them very dangerous. As the saying rightly says: Those who believe in absurdities will commit atrocities.

Thanks John!
. . .
First Comment from JJ-

Recently I had the chance to work around nurses and hear their water-cooler talk. I was SHOCKED!

This article is right on. To these nurses, their true husband and love of their lives is the government and his gifts of love are the medications they take and the procedures they have. And their excitement at the arrival of more new medications was...heartbreaking. This is no joking matter and when they ask questions like, "Have you had your colonoscopy yet?" I believe they are talking about an experience, not a procedure.

Tony B writes-

A couple of years ago a friend asked me what meds I took.  When I said "none" his eyes widened and he asked me who was my doctor.  When I told him I had no doctor as I had no need of one, followed by my question, "Why would anyone need his own doctor?" he about came apart.  He could not believe that anyone my age took no medication.  The conversation became a sort of round table as I learned that practically everyone, old or young, is using (buying) some regular prescription, .  Wondering about this obvious insanity, it dawned on me that this is the direct result of the moronic "get a regular checkup" con job that the public has long accepted.

Not marching to anyone's beat, it never occurred to me to waste time and money on a doctor visit if I was perfectly healthy.  If I caught a sickness of any debilitating kind I simply went to bed and let my body cure itself, still do.  Simple and very effective losing a minimum of time.  I had assumed all my life that everyone else did as I did, having no idea of the size of the money empire which had been built under the fake name of "health."  This same friend agreed with me on questioning that his ills always got better immediately after he finished taking the meds prescribed by "his doctor."  He didn't want to try my advice of not taking the meds at all and observing how long it took to heal.

Whatever happened to common sense?  For instance, how could millions of mothers criminally allow their perfectly healthy babies to be loaded with multiple, unknown to them, poisonous jabs, even before those babies developed an immune system?  (Think thought destroying government schools and omnipresent alphabet government agencies for the major answer to such questions, closely followed by the kept and notoriously criminal, forever intrusive, media.)

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Eric Peters - Are You Hypochondriac or Heretic? "

AL said (April 30, 2021):

When I hear and see this word "JAB" over and over again it reminds me of the scene in the movie "Hot Fuzz" when Simon Pegg reprimands his partner from using the term "Police Force"; "Police Force" is too aggressive so better to use the term "Police Service" instead.

It was not too long ago when vaccines were called "SHOTS" and that's exactly what they are, deadly shots! Gun shots are more merciful because at least they'll kill you quicker than the vaccine shots.

The brilliant psychopaths at the Tavistock institute have done it again and must have come up with the term "Jab" because it sounds so much softer and agreeable than "shot". I personally keep using the term SHOT and I recommend everybody else follow suit.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at