Direct Link to Latest News


MD's Debunking of Masks & Vaccines Goes Viral

August 10, 2021

stock.jpg"We're doing things that are not useful
and we're getting our sources of information
from the Indiana State board of health and the CDC 
who actually don't bother to read science before they do this."

"There is no reason for treating any person vaccinated
any differently than any person unvaccinated."

Obviously the CDC vaccines have nothing to do with stopping the flu and everything to do with imposing a Masonic-Jewish Communist tyranny on mankind.

Transcript of Video  (580,000 views)

by Dan Stock MD
(abbreviated by

I'm actually a functional family medicine physician.  That means I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation.    Everything being recommended by the cdc and the state board of health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses.   They are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask.   By the way the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we've presented to you that's has been given to the secretary.   As a matter of fact it quotes at least three studies that sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact,  even though the cdc and the nih have chosen to avoid to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this.  It's because you cannot make these viruses go away.  The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged as has happened recently with these vaccines and then they cause symptomatic disease.  

Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs - and this is very important point -  no one can make this virus go away. The cdc has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox where we could make a virus go away.   Smallpox had no animal reservoirs.   The only thing it learned to infect was humans.   That's why we were able to make that virus go away. 

That will not happen with this any more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial,  virus,  adenoviral respiratory syndromes or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can't do this is because you're trying to do something which has already been tried and can't be done.  Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. 

And I would hope this board would start asking itself before it considers taking the advice of the CDC,  the NIH, and the State board of health why we are doing things about this that we didn't do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus.  And then ask yourself why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don't do that.

got-his-wish.jpg(l. Got his wish)

And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called antibody mediated viral enhancement.   That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronaviruses after the Sars outbreak...(This) ... causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.

And that is why you're seeing a outbreak right now.  In fact in that flash drive you're going to have coming to you and in the emails with six extra will be a study showing that 75 percent of people who had covid 19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable,  Massachusetts outbreak were fully vaccinated.

Therefore there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated...

You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.    In 2014 there was outbreak of mumps in the National hockey league.  The only people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status.    Boy that sounds like a great argument for vaccines, but a question that you should ask yourself:   knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual,  where did they get the disease?   And the answer was from the vaccinated individuals.

And that's why you're still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going to make all of this go away, but has suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID 19 develop in the middle of the summer, when vitamin d levels are at their highest.


By the way the other thing that would be necessary for any vaccine restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available.    And I can tell you having treated over 15 COVID 19 patients that between active loading with vitamin D,  Ivermectin,  and zinc that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital.   And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D  level greater than 55, your risk of covid-19 death will drop down to through one-quarter of the population average for the United States.   And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections -  since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from covid19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all:    no reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization, and suffer two to four times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently. vaccinated.   Therefore the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.   

I don't blame this board for that because I know you aren't scientists and you thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC,  NIH, and the Indiana State Board of health, but i would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what's on that data drive.   And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that i will happily come back and sit with you individually if you would like, to explain the science behind this.   And if you're worried about being sued by somebody because you don't follow the guidance of the CDC in the NIH,  I will tell you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your .disposal.   i will testify in defensive discord turning down all these recommendations for free at any time in any court.

Thanks to Ray!

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at