Direct Link to Latest News

Below - Politicall Incorrect Advice for Young Men (scroll down)

YOU are God's Representative on Earth

January 21, 2020

(We are made in the image of God. Michelangelo's David gets a dusting.)

We will be destroyed if we continue to defy the Creator's Plan.

We were designed to serve God, not ourselves.  

Only when society rededicates itself to God's service 
will it flourish. 

A spark of Divinity shines in our soul. It's what defines us as human, We were not designed to be selfish. 

"Your people never realize that we offer them only worthless baubles that cannot bring fulfillment. They procure one and consume it and are not filled. We present another. We have an infinite number of outward distractions, to the extent that life cannot again turn inward to find its definite fulfillment. You have become addicted to our medicine through which we have become your absolute masters..."

We have converted the people to our philosophy of getting and acquiring so that they will never be satisfied. A dissatisfied people are pawns in our game of world conquest. Thus, they are always seeking and never able to find satisfaction. The very moment they seek happiness outside themselves, [God] they become our willing servants."  -

- Illuminati insider, Harold Rosenthal

by Henry Makow PhD

1. You are God's servant. Your every thought and deed must honor Him. God is always watching. You cannot escape the truth. 

2. We are spurned lovers. Although we have been taught to hate God, in fact we are in love with God. God is love itself, bliss, truth, beauty, goodness and justice. We are spiritual beings. Our purpose in life is to bear witness to God, and to do God's work. He cannot do it without our agency. 

Told by Satanists that God doesn't exist, we are rebounders taking up with every floozie  -- money, fame, sex, power -- to fill the void.  

3. Cabalists have convinced us that being an atheist is cool. In fact, when we deny our Divinity, we are only degrading ourselves and shutting the door to our own liberation, fulfillment and happiness. 

We are cutting off our nose to spite our face. God is the principle of our growth as human beings. We find ourselves to the extent we devote ourselves to serving God and nothing else. 

4. There is a massive disconnect between religious teachings (scripture) and behavior. We think that if we have the right belief-system, we are somehow good people. Behavior is everything.
You can have the right beliefs and still behave very badly. Your true religion is the sum total of how you spend your day, what you did, said and thought about, how you treated others. 

You can serve God simply by having healthy beautiful children and raising them according to wholesome family values. 

5.  Our most important relationship is with God within. We're obsessed with relationships. They often fail because we're trying to replicate our relationship with God.  None can substitute or give us as much freedom and happiness. Our top five relationships are all with God. Then we can add the others. 

6. Want people to like you? Do something for them. 

Want people to love you? Love them!

Want God to love you? Love Him!

What do we love instead? 

7. True religion is devoting your life to God's service. Do you represent God or a greedy horny monkey? We do have a choice. 

8. Prayer is how we talk to God. We should be praying to God constantly. God is our North Star, our compass. Life is meaningless if we do not devote ourselves to the "Work" --
to tame our monkey, and experience God's Presence, which is true freedom. 

You are God's representative on Earth. Make Him proud.  

---------------- We Suffer from a Mental Illness  ("They" took control of our minds.)

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "YOU are God's Representative on Earth"

TG said (January 22, 2020):

Nice article for the most part but you stay on the fringe of it all. You state if we want God to love us we must first love Him. No, He already does for He first loved us, and did He not send His Son to die for us. You say we need to honor Him, true, but we can truly only have Him in our lives by accepting Him as Savior, which you have stated in the past that yo deny that for yourself. A personal relationship on His terms, to ours.

Lorie said (January 22, 2020):

Hi Henry, You really got it right. Especially points 4,5,6. This is amazing wisdom. Your previous article implied that God needs us in some way. I perceive He doesn't NEED us to "DO" anything for him but He does WANT us to LOVE him (like a "loving" parent who bestows gifts on his children and wants them to love him). Our Loving Father bestows so many gifts (sights, smells, sounds) that we largely ignore, criticize, or take for granted (read entire Bible).

Jesus says in John 4:23-24 "But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth."

Note; Also remember (per theme of your posts)- this is a satanically possessed world because of Satan's jealousy of God and hatred, i.e., his main goal is manipulating mankind into worshipping him (temporary success with ultimate degradation)- think of hollywood idols"stars" (fallen angels) , politics, science,etc - who sold out for fame and worship satan; this is devastating and EVER so short lived. Love GOD the creator and cast aside all idols (and fears).

Chris Cooper said (January 22, 2020):

What a load of bollox!

1. You are God's servant. Your every thought and deed must honor Him. God is always watching.




I am not anyone's servant and I do not get on my knees and beg for help.


JG said (January 21, 2020):

Excellent Henry! It's as if you were reading my thoughts on how I fall short of that mark.

For years I have been wrong. I was like one of the Pharaises who knew the law that was clean on the outside but wretched on the inside.

Yes, we are to show and demonstrate that love of our God to our neighbor as we are commanded to do. It can be done in so many ways because there are no small favors when it comes to helping someone.

I have had a long history of being OK sometimes but at other times allowing myself to be overwhelmed with worldly circumstances that result in a behavoir contrary to God's commands.

The story of Peter denying Jesus Christ three times comes to mind with me often when I fault. It's true that our flesh is weak. Jesus showed him great love by forgiving him and he can forgive us also.

There are still Saints in this world doing God's commands and they often are not the rich and famous who have heaped up treasures for themselves in this world. We can't have it both ways.

Keep up the good message Henry.

Below - MLK Holiday is Proof the US is Closet Communist (scroll down)

Politically Incorrect Advice for Young Men (Updated)

January 20, 2020

What I wish I knew when I was 21.

" Avoid women who exhibit any of the four-C's: (Women who) compete, control, criticize or complain. 
 Avoid women who are overachievers or neurotic. Don't get hung up on unavailable women. 
 They're not as special as they think. Choose a wife who complements you and is a good companion. 
Choose one who will be a good mother."

Revised From May 14, 2017

by Henry Makow PhD.

My life was dysfunctional until the age of 50 partly because I accepted the feminist assumptions purveyed by the mass media.

I never imagined the financial elite is engaged in a war to destabilize society by trashing heterosexual roles. This government hate attack on the traditional family continues unabated today. The purpose is to create a totalitarian New World Order where people are socially isolated and mind controlled. 

Like millions of men, I was let "off the hook" by sexual liberation and feminism. Instead of becoming a husband and father, I was free to have sex and search for my "identity."

Often sex and identity were confused. I didn't understand that men mature and find purpose by assuming the responsibility of marriage and family. As a result, I suffered from arrested development (immaturity) and missed my opportunity to have a family.

What follows is an antidote to elite feminist propaganda. I don't want young men to make the same mistakes i did.

1. The creation of a strong and loving family is perhaps the highest goal to which a man can aspire. This is the natural process by which men (and women) grow over a lifetime. This is how we find love and intimacy. It isn't for everyone but for most, it is the path to happiness.

2. Stop listening to the media, your peer group or parents. 

"Trust thy self," Emerson says in Self Reliance (1841) "Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist." What are your instincts telling you? For example, I always knew I wanted to rule my own roost but feminism prohibited this. Obey your instincts.

3. Make work (not women) your passion. Work is the backbone of a man. Men gain self-confidence from performing a task well, and receiving reward and recognition. Women may try to come between a man and his work but don't let them. Don't let anyone or anything thwart your gift. Women do not respect men who make them their first priority. Your work will keep you on course and help you to avoid temptation.

4. Don't mistake sexual attraction for love. Our society makes female beauty and sex into a phoney religion in order to distract us. Sex and beauty soon become tedious. The magic ends. Do not marry someone based on sexual infatuation. Real love develops over a long period of time and is based on mutual dependence, trust and caring.

5. Do not put beautiful women on a pedestal. They is no relationship between a woman's appearance and her character. Beautiful women are flawed like everyone else. They're much more trouble because of their sense of entitlement.

6. Never show weakness. In courtship, don't appear eager. Women interpret this as weakness. Keep your dignity. Nothing earns her respect quicker than rejection. Men think they'll be loved for their sterling qualities. This is not so. Women are focused on themselves. They're looking for men who make them feel secure. They want men who exude confidence. If you're insecure, find a woman who has lower self esteem than you.

7. The best way to fight sex addiction is to get married. Sex without love is degrading and dehumanizing. Sexual liberation is not wanting sex (because you have it.) Sex is used to manipulate us. People wouldn't be sexually frustrated if they got married at a young age as they did in the 1950's and started families. Women should marry and have kids before going to university; men after beginning their careers.  

8. Do not marry a woman who doesn't make you and her family her first priority. Do you want to share your wife with her boss? 

If you have an aim in life, why marry someone who doesn't support it? Or has a competing agenda? In the marketplace of love, men have the power. Our fertility lasts three times as long as theirs. We're the buyers. There are plenty of fine women, especially if we look abroad.

9. Real women are self-effacing. They put their husbands and their children before themselves. This is how women show love: by self-surrender. Avoid the four-C's: Women who compete, control, criticize or complain. Avoid women who are overachievers or neurotic. Don't get hung up on unavailable women. They're aren't as special as they think. Choose a wife who complements you and is a good companion. Don't look for your "female counterpart." (You're looking for yourself.) Choose one who has qualities you lack and will be a good mother.

10. Being possessive is natural. A man wants to possess a woman. Women want to be possessed. In the act of love, a man "possesses" a woman. Total love equals total possession. This is not the same as domination. It is a partnership based on mutual trust and respect. My wife does not share my political views or read my website.

11. Your seed (semen) is your unique spirit and essence. Would you entrust it to a vulgar or mediocre woman just because she's attractive? Ideally we would only have sex with a woman we would want to mother our children. This is why sex was reserved for marriage.

12. Children represent your organic growth. They are an extension of yourself. The media is doing a number on us. How often do we see children portrayed in a positive light? As the angels they often are? We are rich in proportion to the things we love. The highest love is between husband and wife, and parents and children.

13. Don't waste your time "looking for God." We find God by serving and obeying Him. God speaks through our sense of right and wrong, and ideals of absolute truth, justice and love. We are not men if we refuse to sacrifice our "selves" to God ( i.e. obey) . Truth is liberating even if the truth is about our present bondage.

14. You are not the voice in your head. We cohabit with a monkey. Don't be deceived or upset by how mean and vulgar his thoughts often are. They're not you. You are a spark of Divine consciousness housed in the body of an evolved ape. Your job is to train the ape by training the shared mind.

Some of this was common knowledge when I was a child in the 1950's. Over the years, the Illuminati have gradually undermined the natural order by promoting homosexuality which includes sexual liberation and lesbianism in the guise of feminism.

An establishment that sows fear and confusion between the sexes, and promotes promiscuity and family breakdown does not have the country's best interest at heart.

Many of our feminist political, cultural and economic "leaders" are moral whores, dupes, traitors and often worse. We resist them by building strong healthy families and giving our children wholesome values.


See also my "Managing the Male Sex Drive"

AND "Men, Seek Helpmates, not Soulmates"    

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Politically Incorrect Advice for Young Men (Updated) "

Tony said (February 27, 2015):

Hear, Hear Henry! It took me a while to figure this out as well, but I wholeheartedly concur. I am a white 45 year old American male that was bamboozled most of my years. No matter. I have one teenage son from a failed marriage. I fear he, as well, is being brainwashed by the "One World" machination. I am grateful for people like you that speak out and pull back the curtain to those in the dark. Thanks again Henry for so many years of service.

Diane said (February 27, 2015):

Dear MEN, this article has some truths, but here is some sage advice for you. Women feel unappreciated today because they do have a God-given gift of caring and loving--and men keep trying to take their place in that area and men are becoming pansies or what the intellectuals call "feminized", they are even making Daddy Diaper Bags now!

Women are feeling like they are loosing their identity and chance to show what they are good at--and some even do not ever get to experience this cause they spend their lives at the office.

Here's the advice: What makes women happy is to feel like you appreciate their gifts of love and caring--men do not have this instinct in the same way we do, although it is great when a man is nurturing. Let her shine as the family wife and/or mother and do not compete with her for those roles.

Rich C said (February 26, 2015):

This is one of your finest articles ever. You tie it all together beautifully yet with simplicity and parsimony. This idea that the nature of women has been changed, and obviously by extension, men too, also ties in to the nature of money being changed as well. From a medium of exchange into something that is fruitful and produces itself. As if it copulates and produces new ducats. This is all part and parcel of the big lie.

This article also encapsulates traditional Catholic teaching. Point number 14 and your nod to having some kind of belief in evolution is not problematic to me at all. Because you interpret it in the correct way in recognizing the need for a moral order. Unfortunately, most use the idea of evolution and the "monkey within" to engage in bad behavior. I simply wanted to point out that we Catholics would simply refer to it as Original Sin.

I will be printing this one out and reading it to my children when each one is ready for it. Some already are, others will have it read to them at some point in the future.

Norm B said (February 26, 2015):

"mind control replaces jackboot"

Huxley was closer than Orwell, Henry. Consent, not coercion. It's tough to get the 'consensually downtrodden' to rise up against their masters.

LW said (February 26, 2015):

Great article. I’ve been reading your site the past eight years and it’s amazing how close to home it has hit. I first found it after my now ex-wife divorced me after a year of marriage.

Since then I’ve been lucky enough to marry the “right” woman and we have two beautiful daughters. No doubt being a father has made me a better person and I would do anything for them.

My past is something I would hate to let them know about as I was only in relationships for sex and told lie after lie to get in the sack. Thanks again for awakening me regarding what a relationship should be and the NWO.

They’ve taken away so many freedoms during my life but at least I have my free will and my mind!

Please keep up the great work you share.

Michael E said (February 26, 2015):

Wonderful article!! I am a 21 year old male & I really needed this! The media is so sinister its pushing people down the wrong path. I'm just getting my life together & I would love to hear more of your thoughts/advice so I can spread the word. Peace & thank you so much.

Mary H said (February 26, 2015):

I would add

Seek God with your whole mind, your whole heart and your whole soul.........ask for His Will to be done in your life,
The Lord's Prayer is a good place to start.

Marcos said (February 26, 2015):

An interesting segway of this article is "never commit abortion".

Royal families wait anxiously for their firstborns, as they will inherit the kingdom. The elite prepares their children in the best schools in order to maintain and expand their wealth. Throughout history, proud fathers took joy from their inheritance, as a sign of blessing and accomplishment. A mark in the world. Their posterity.

However, we plebs are expected to murder our babies because they are inconvenient or because the globalists made it too expensive to care for them. We are not supposed to build a posterity or a legacy.

Below- Hexed - Hexagram Holds Humanity Hostage (scroll down)

MLK Holiday is Proof the US is Closet Communist

They never quit because subverting you is their religion.

(left, the Jewish owned and operated NewYorker portrays paid Communist Party instigator Martin Luther King arm-in-arm with multimillionaire players protesting the plight of Black Americans.) 

Today is Martin Luther King Day in the US. It takes an important holiday to close stock markets. Martin Luther King was a fraud.

Below, Alan Stang (1932-2009) shows that King was literally a Communist agent, a philanderer, a pagan and a plagiarist. He even plagiarized the "I Have a Dream" speech. The national holiday in his name is more proof that the US is thoroughly subverted. 

This holiday is another reminder that Organized Jewry is essentially Communist, and the real meaning of Communism is a monopoly over everything (incl. thought) by the Luciferian central banking cartel and its minions. 
Organized Jewry (Communism) champions the underdog in order to undermine Western society. Cabalist Judaism is a corrosive acid that seeps into the fissures of society -- race, class, gender -- in order to erode it. They say so themselves. There is no genuine desire to uplift or empower the goyim. On the contrary, the agenda is to cripple & destroy Western society and rebuild it in their sad and loathsome image: The New World Order. 

Open your eyes folks! Trump. Obama. Clinton. Sanders. They are all Communists. 

from Jan 10, 2019
(Excerpts by 

There are five important aspects of Martin Luther King's career: 1) his Communist Party activities; 2) the violence that always erupted in a King demonstration; 3) his plagiarism; 4) his sexual pathology; 5) his pagan beliefs. 

Martin Luther King attended a Communist training school in Tennessee. A famous picture shows him enjoying a lecture in the company of Communist Aubrey Williams and Abner W. Berry, a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party. Rosa Parks, who helped King launch the Montgomery Bus Boycott, learned how to do it at the same Communist training school.

...Suddenly, King started to make speeches about the war in Vietnam. Well-meaning Americans scratched their heads. The war took him far afield from "civil rights," and his speeches started sounding like enemy propaganda cooked up in Hanoi. The reason was that Stanley Levison was writing those speeches. So who was Stanley Levison?

Stanley was the paymaster in this country for the KGB, the Soviet secret police. The KGB routinely sent Levison the rubles to pay for all Soviet activities in the United States, and he would distribute the money. How high up in the Soviet apparatus would you have to be - how much would the KGB have to trust you - to get that job? Stanley Levison, of the KGB, financed King and wrote his speeches. That is correct: the Soviet secret police financed Martin Luther King and put the words in his mouth.

King was said to be "heroic" because he was an apostle of Mohandas K. Gandhi's non-violence in India. For that reason, many Americans at the time wondered why it was that, wherever King went, violence erupted. Why the paradox? King explained it himself, in a piece he wrote for Saturday Review, April 3, 1965 ("Behind the Selma March," pp. 16-17, 57), in which he set forth the four steps of his technique:

"1. Nonviolent demonstrators go into the streets to exercise their constitutional rights. 2. Racists resist by unleashing violence against them. 3. Americans of conscience in the name of decency demand federal intervention and legislation. 4. The administration, under mass pressure, initiates measures of immediate intervention and remedial legislation."

Remember, this is not something we are accusing him of. King wrote this himself. Notice that step two of his formulation calls for violence. The reason violence broke out wherever he went was that violence was what he went into the streets to get. Without the necessary violence, his schemes would fall flat. So, in King's scenario, why would "racists" attack "nonviolent" demonstrators?

Drue Lackey was Montgomery, Alabama Chief of Police. In a speech in October, 2006, he explained that in the famous confrontation of 1965, "non-violent" demonstrators tried to provoke his policemen to react, by throwing "non-violent" bottles and bricks, and bedecking them with gobs of spit, while other "non-violent" demonstrators waited nearby to take pictures...


On December 3, 1989, Frank Johnson revealed in the British Sunday Telegraph, that Ralph Luker, associate editor of the King Papers Project, said King had "borrowed" heavily from the thesis of Jack Boozer, fellow Boston University theology student and later Professor of Religion at Emory. While Boozer was away in the military, King stole his work. In September, 1990, Thomas Fleming wrote in Chronicles that King's doctorate should be considered a courtesy title, because he had plagiarized his dissertation.

If the truth had leaked, Boston University would have been humiliated. It is a short distance from B.U. to P.U. So, B.U. President Jon Westling sent a letter to Chronicles (published in the January, 1991 issue) denying Fleming's charge. Westling said King's dissertation had been "scrupulously examined and reexamined by scholars," and that "not a single instance of plagiarism of any sort has been identified. . . . not a single reader has ever found any nonattributed or misattributed quotations, misleading paraphrases, or thoughts borrowed without due scholarly reference in any of its 343 pages." Hey, Jon, how long was your nose after you said all that?

Claiborne Carson was director of the Project. He denied all charges until Waldman said he had a copy of Boozer's dissertation. Then he caved. The story appeared on the front page of the Wall Street Journal on November 9, 1990. The article quoted Claiborne Carson finally admitting King's plagiarism, but it calls his thievery "borrowings," and "voice merging" that derives from the oral traditions of the black church. In other words, he was saying that thievery was a tradition of the black church, an intolerable insult.

The article says that "most of King's papers had many original thoughts," but often "borrowed without citing," According to Waldman, Carson was asking staff members to refrain from use of the "p" word at work. In short, even the author of the exposé leaned over backward far enough to do an Olympic flip. Compare this treatment to what you know would be done to anyone else - black, white or whatever - who commits misrepresentation as outrageous as King's. He would be stripped of his degree. Look for instance at the case of Clifford Irving's phony "biography" of Howard Hughes.

Gerry Harbison was a professor of chemistry at the University of Nebraska. He was certainly not a "right-wing wacko." He was full of praise for the "civil rights movement." Professor Harbison is worth quoting at length: "Like most graduate students, King spent the first half of his doctoral work taking courses in his degree area, theology. His surviving papers from that period show that from the very beginning he was transcribing articles by eminent theologians, often word for word, and representing them as his own work.

"After completing his course work, graduate students usually write a dissertation or thesis, supposedly an independent and original contribution to scholarship. King's thesis was anything but original. In fact, the sheer extent of his plagiarism is breathtaking. Page after page contains nothing but direct, verbatim transcriptions of the work of others. In 1990, the King Project estimated that less than half of some chapters was actually written by King himself. Since then, even more of his 'borrowings' have been traced...


Now let's look at King's Christianity. He was a "Reverend." He had a "doctorate" in theology. The man was as brilliant a theologian as Boston University's Jack Boozer. Christianity, we are told, was the inspiration for everything he did. What did Martin Luther King believe?

Among the papers with his name on it is one entitled, "What Experiences of Christians Living in the Early Christian Century Led to the Christian Doctrines of the Divine Sonship of Jesus, the Virgin Birth, and the Bodily Resurrection." The title itself tells us something is wrong. These doctrines came not from anyone's "experience," but from history and from what Jesus said. But, "Dr." King comments, "these doctrines are historically and philosophically untenable." (sic)

Here is how Jesus got to be divine, according to "Dr." King: "The first doctrine of our discussion which deals with the divine sonship of Jesus went through a great process of developement. (sic) . . . How then did this doctrine of divine sonship come into being? We may find a partial clue to the actual rise of this doctrine in the spreading of Christianity into the Greco-Roman world. . . . Anything that possessed flesh was always underminded (sic) in Greek thought. And so in order to receive inspiration from Jesus the Greeks had to apotheosize him.

". . . As Hedley laconically states, 'the church had found God in Jesus, and so it called Jesus the Christ; and later under the influence of Greek thought-forms, the only begotten Son of God.'" In short, according to King, it was the Greeks who made Jesus "divine." My guess is that King really did write this, because it is so incompetent. This is the writing of a mediocre high school sophomore, not a man about to receive a doctorate.

Here is King on the virgin birth: "First we must admit that the evidence for the tenability of this doctrine is to (sic) shallow to convince any objective thinker . . . ." Finally, consider that the resurrection is the master doctrine of Christian belief. Catholics believe it. Protestants believe it. Without the resurrection, there is no Christianity; there is just another "wise man." If you don't believe in the resurrection, then go your way in peace, but you are not a Christian.

So, what does "Dr." King believe about the resurrection? "The last doctrine in our discussion deals with the resurrection story. This doctrine, upon which the Easter Faith rests, symbolizes the ultimate Christian conviction: that Christ conquered death. From a literary, historical, and philosophical point of view this doctrine raises many questions. In fact the external evidence for the authenticity of this doctrine is found wanting. . . ." According to King, the apostles made it all up because they loved Him so much.

So, "Dr." King was not a Christian. Along these lines, King was an ardent supporter of Planned Parenthood, the baby-killing racket, won their Margaret Sanger Award in 1966 and said "there is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts." Mrs. Sanger's early efforts included agitation to limit the procreation of the "inferior races" and publishing the work of Nazi propagandists. Were those the early efforts he meant?


Finally, there was King's career as a sexual predator. We are not just talking about a world-class philanderer like Jack Kennedy. We're not just talking about Fiddle and Faddle in the White House and Marilyn Monroe. We're talking about a genuine sexual psychopath. How do we know this? We know it because FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover tapped his telephones and bugged King's activities. Why did Hoover do that?

He did it because his boss, Attorney General Bobby Kennedy - a certified demigod in the illiberal pantheon - ordered him to. The Kennedys had become aware of King's Communist activities and were worried. They brought him to the White House, where the President himself warned King that what he was doing could discredit them all. They wanted to know what he was up to, hence the wiretaps and bugs. What did they find out? Because the truth is so putrid, some of it has leaked.

For instance, King was in Norway to accept the Nobel Prize. He spent the night before the ceremony chasing a woman naked down the hallway in his Oslo hotel. King was naked. I don't know whether the woman was. A story in the Atlanta Journal, dated March 31, 1965, quoted Republican Congressman William Dickinson as saying that King participated in "all night sessions of debauchery" in a church. On the night before he was killed, King participated in another orgy. He hired prostitutes and paid for them with church money. He beat at least one of them up. Again, he wasn't just a womanizer; he was a predator. He should have been in jail.

At the request of Mrs. King, a court has sequestered all this evidence until the year 2027, long enough to milk everything possible from the myth. We share Mrs. King's embarrassment. There are over 60,000 censored pages. Some of them have been released under the Freedom of Information Act; the rest has been labeled "obscene." King's own son says his father was killed in a "massive conspiracy" because his bizarre behavior, long-term depression and alcohol abuse had become a liability the killers couldn't afford.


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "MLK Holiday is Proof the US is Closet Communist "

Tony B said (January 20, 2020):

During King's time of stirring up dissension and revolution in mostly the southern U.S. states (which eventually led to blacks becoming a privileged class in the U.S.), he organized a march on a western Maryland city, Hagerstown, if my memory still serves. His opportunistic marchers halted a few miles south of town awaiting King's limousine's arrival.

Meanwhile a group of Hagerstown citizens, mostly black and led by a black doctor who had been delivering the babies of Hagerstown for many decades, hundreds of them white babies, arrived from the north and blocked King's unruly bunch from moving forward. The doctor told King and his wrecking crew that they would not be allowed to destroy the peace of their town.

King, tail between his legs, got back into his chauffeured limousine which turned around and left.

End of story. But a story of no interest to the kept media.

JG said (January 20, 2020):

Bobby and John Kennedy maybe had the right idea on Civil Rights.
They were not White Apologists but were supporters of Civil Rights. Bobby and John were both nationalists who represented ALL races of America.
I don't know if MLK really believed that his "dream" could only be achieved with the help of the Communist Party or not but he was being partially supported by them. Along with their support came the price tag of an anti American agenda.
John Kennedy actually approached MLK about his Communist associations in the Rose Garden. He knew that Communism would eventually bring chaos and division to America.
Born Michael J King Jr., his name was changed to Martin Luther King Jr. when he was 28 years old. Odly, King was never a Lutheran at all. Michael was a Baptist minister. However, he had a lot of success with this new name. It gave him dignity and reverence.

MLK's association with the Communist Party in the end was his undoing. You can't serve the Baptist Church and the Communist Party at the same time. Communism is an enemy of the Church.

Gary said (January 19, 2018):

Yep, a lot of us know all that and more. The one thing I find ironic in the whole King shitpile is the fact that the government murdered him and then gave him a national holiday. What does that say about the US government? That's right I was thinking the same thing.


Apparently, his opposition to Vietnam was off script.


Satanist Response to "You are God's rep on Earth"

January 22, 2020

"The Xtian God is a nasty, vicious tyrant. 
His piss weak son is a Nancy boy who preached servitude 
and dependence to attract the slaves."

by Aloysius Fozdyke 

Sure, if you're dumb enough. Let me concentrate on Xtianity. Xtians believe in a God who sent himself, to sacrifice himself to himself, in order to save humanity from himself. This is the sick Xtian message and you'd have to be brain dead to accept it. At least you can't say that Xtianity isn't God centred, but why he didn't do all of this on the dark side of the Moon is beyond me. That way, all humanity would be saved and we wouldn't have to continually debase ourselves via the obey, pay and pray trinity.

The Xtian God is a nasty, vicious tyrant. His piss weak son is a Nancy boy who preached servitude and dependence to attract the slaves. Shave the beard and add a bit of rouge and Jesus would be a hit in any gay bar. You ever notice how all his apostles were men? And have you wondered why the more people love God the less they love humans, while working their horror completely and cheerfully from their religious conviction? "My enemies are obviously God's enemies!"

Even a casual reading of history proves that Jesus has caused more persecutions, wars and sundry miseries than any other name, but being a vampire entity who instructed his disciples to drink his blood and eat his flesh in return for eternal life, what would you expect? The only thing of any relevance that every altar boys' wet dream ever said is that 'you can judge a tree from its fruits' and using that criteria two thousand years of Xtianity should be more than enough for any healthy stomach!

Finally, 'the lord is my shepherd' and like all good shepherds eventually he'll lead you to the slaughterhouse - because that's what shepherds do; eventually.

Yours with Satan,


The US is the Jew's Golem

January 3, 2020

The US is the Jew's Golem

"Someone who is large but intellectually slow is called a golem. Other civilizations, such as the ancient Greeks, have similar concepts."

Often in Ashkenazi Hasidic lore, the golem would come to life and serve his creators by doing tasks assigned to him. The most well-known story of the golem is connected to Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, the Maharal of Prague (1513-1609). It was said that he created a golem out of clay to protect the Jewish community from Blood Libel and to help out doing physical labor, since golems are very strong. 

Another version says it was close to Easter, in the spring of 1580 and a Jew-hating priest was trying to incite the Christians against the Jews. So the golem protected the community during the Easter season. Both versions recall the golem running amok and threatening innocent lives, so Rabbi Loew removed the Divine Name, rendering the golem lifeless. A separate account has the golem going mad and running away. Several sources attribute the story to Rabbi Elijah of Chelm, saying Rabbi Loew, one of the most outstanding Jewish scholars of the sixteenth century who wrote numerous books on Jewish law, philosophy, and morality, would have actually opposed the creation of a golem.

The golem has been a popular figure in the arts in the past few centuries with both Jews and non-Jews. In the early 20th century, several plays, novels, movies, musicals and even a ballet were based on the golem. The most famous works where golems appear are Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Karel Capek's R.U.R. (where the word "robot" comes from), Isaac Bashevis Singer's The Golem and The X-Files. There is also a character named Golem in J.R.R. Tolkien's classic series The Lord of the Rings. Today, there is even a golem museum in the Jewish Quarter of Prague.

Linde thinks Eastern Europe is a flashpoint for WW3

January 1, 2020


Linde thinks Eastern Europe is a flashpoint for WW3

"The document is as shocking as The Protocols of Zion because the Plan which the Rebbe propounds is The Protocols of Zion - just specific details as it pertains to the Slavs."

By Linde

I will bet you anything  we won't be hearing about the Code Red and Brown for the Slavs or any of  this on ZOG USA official 'Education and Sharing Day'.  In 1978,  Congress asked that UN catamite  Pres Jimmy Carter to fix Nisan 11 (the Rebbe's birthday) as the date to promote those 'universal values' of which he speaks.   Falls on  April 5 in 2020.

I think this is authentic.  I think this is the  Rebbe speaking.  True he disappeared from any public view before 1994, but I think this is him addressing whatever Chabad calls the  ruling council of its Kaganate.  They always gloat over those they assume to be doomed so Revelation of the Method is always going to be part of their operations..  ( Credit Michael Hoffman for this insider knowledge).  This speech was made and published after the date that he is supposed to have died, so there will always be a question mark over its authenticity.  Just one of those meticulous attentions to detail that I think seals it as the real deal.

I tend to think that the Chabad Lubavitch is rather the neck of the Snake - turning it all directions.  The capstone of their world pyramid of vassal nations owned by their Central Banking Cartel remains concealed together with its Crown - of which the final two Protocols of Zion deal namely, the King of the Jews of the lineage of David.  All of that is still covert.

The document is as shocking as The Protocols of Zion because the Plan which the Rebbe propounds is The Protocols of Zion - just specific details as it pertains to the Slavs.

And like The Protocols of Zion, it explains the operation of the 'Political' in history, an operation of which the goyim are to have no knowledge (and they don't - unless , of course they read documents like The Protocols).  Like the Protocols it predicts the future and explains all the data of the present.  

For example, ZOG West's greatest military build-up in half a century for the February 2020 military exercises in the Ukraine and the billions of dollars of military equipment that is pouring into Ukraine.  Trump did not respond with the alacrity expected of ZOG west to Zelensky's request for more billions in military/medical aid. Bang - impeachment.  

The Trump impeachment is a DIVERSION - this is punch and judy for the goy plantation.  (That said, if he weathers this process he can't be impeached again - he's locked in. And this could have big ramifications in a nuclear war).   

But what is really going on is the great forces that are massing against ZOG East in the Ukraine: Defender 2020 and the bi-partisan passage of the NDAA last year. "Ukraine is at the heart of the [impeachment] crisis"  

A crisis that has been made by The Owners of ZOG usa through the CIA and their Demonrat asset.  ZOG East - the great champion of JudeoXian civilisation, its Orthodox church with KGB succession, 'mulit-polar' world yada yada - naturally views this build-up in the Ukraine with alarm.  

Whether you look at ZOG East or ZOG West, what you see in power is wall-to-wall Jews supervised by Chabad.  We are in the part of the Plan where the big jobs are public and performed by 'brother Jews'.  This is them.  In the video : Putin I and Putin II are clearly displayed.

The important question to answer is: who are the Slavs?  Much of what the Rebbe says about the Slavs and Russians could not have been understood by the Americans until the publication in English of Two Thousand Years Together by Solzhenitsyn.  "You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians.  They hated Russians"...

At 22.22  see Chabad Lazar with an infant or a doll of this people hated above all the goyim by the Judaic Ashkhanazim.  Ethnically, historically the Slavs were ruled in the 9th century by a Norwegian Varingian Rurik Dynasty under Svytoslav and a population of the Ostragoths, Finns, Sarmatians etc became the Kievan Rus - Novrogod. These are one people and they are divided up geo-politically (by their enemies) - the White Russians in Russia, the Belarus, the Ukrainians, the Poles are ethnically one people and before the Great Schism they were one Church with both Latin and Old Slavonic Byzantine Rites.   

Under Svytoslav in the 9th century they made war upon Sarkel. They fought the Khaganate of Khazaria which ruled the Oxus, the Silk Road. Their Draco standard of Great Tartaria was obeyed as far East as the Orkhon River of Mongolia where their Orkhon script is still found on the stone monuments.  They made war with the Kievan Rus over the Amber Road out of the Baltics to the Mediterranean. And they lost.  The Rus, responding to the evangelization of Saints Cyril and Methodius threw down Khazaria and later followed their Prince Vladimir as a nation into the fountain of Baptism in the Crimea.  In the last five years Poland, which seriously understands this matter, has made Christ the King of Poland.

The ZOGs are massing great forces in Central Europe and that is where The Owners intend to ignite their war.