Direct Link to Latest News


CPS: Child Protectors or Pimps?

November 21, 2010

schaefer,-nancy.jpgNancy Shaefer, an outspoken child advocate, was brutally murdered in March. To shrug this off is to accept an evil tyranny.

"The family is the natural foundation for marriage and home relationships. The family deserves and should always be protected by the state, the culture and by society." The late Sen. Nancy Schaefer

by Richard Evans

In 2004, Georgia State Senator Nancy Schaefer found evidence of deep corruption within the Federal  'child protective services' system which handles children designated as 'wards of the State'. In 2007, she published her findings which, she said later, "cost me my Senate seat." It may also have cost her life.
During the night of March 26th 2010, Nancy was shot execution style in the back of the head in her bed.  Her husband of 54-years, Bruce Schaefer was shot point-blank in the heart.  The Georgia and national media whores wrote it off as 'murder suicide'.

As they always are in Masonic murder cases, illogical explanations were printed up. The murder was described as a "murder-suicide."  

The Schaefers had dozens of personal friends, five grown children and many grandchildren they won't see grow up.   Nancy Schafer at 73 was in robust health and would have surely lived another 15 or 20 years.

The purpose of this article is to ensure more people know learn about her findings.  Child Protective Services uses the phase "in the best interest of the children" to excuse removal of children from poor families for profit. 

From Senator Schaefer's own report,

"The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion by President Bill Clinton, offers cash "bonuses" to the states for every child they adopted out [to] foster care. In order to receive the "adoption incentive bonuses" local child protective services need more children. They must have merchandise (children) that sell and you must have plenty of them so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 [payment for] each child not returned to their family"

That's incentive to CPS workers to extract children and block all family members who might qualify for guardianship.  The Clinton act also pays bonuses if the child has traits that are in greater demand - such as blond hair and blue eyes.  That's a fact.   To get this money the CPS worker has to 'close the sale' with an adoption to an unrelated 3rd party.   It doesn't matter who that party is, as long as they're not related to the child.
Well qualified grandparents are routinely denied custody because the Fed doesn't pay CPS for that.

On top of this, the Civil Rights Act, 42 USC 1983, (also referred to as "section 1983")  give judges "sovereign judicial" IMMUNITY from redress or prosecution for consequences of their decisions.   During the 90's, lawyers were given immunity, and social workers are immune from prosecution for PERJURY.  In a nutshell the State has been unaccountable to the people of America since 1983, and most don't even know that.     


Why are these children in such demand? She believed it is partly for sexual exploitation.  
She attributed the conspicuous abundance of molesters in foster care to the way the system is constructed. It offered no incentive for CPS workers to scrutinize their foster jailers. Their attention is on demonizing the parent so it's not to their advantage to expose  molesters who are part of the CPS racket.

Naturally I looked for anything to tie her investigation to discovery that the  Federal government is running procurement for the international pedophile traffic network.  Unfortunately in the highly compartmentalized Masonic system,  direct procurement for the pedophile/snuff network ala Omaha Franklin case isn't  the role of CPS and Family court.  Of course we know CPS and family court are a link in that chain.   The abduction for that network is outside the judicial and social 'welfare' system..   CPS and court is the first link in that chain for it's the court that dislocates children from family. 

She said CPS "has become a protected empire built on taking children and separating families".  Schaefer called it "legal kidnapping," from natural parents and blood relatives while conspicuously ignoring abuse in foster houses."
From her 2007 report,

- "Poor parents often times are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the where-with-all to hire lawyers and fight the system".

- "Parents are victimized by "the system" that makes a profit for holding children longer and "bonuses" for not returning children".

- "Caseworkers and social workers are oftentimes guilty of fraud. They withhold evidence. They fabricate evidence and they seek to terminate parental rights. However, when charges are made against them, the charges are ignored".

- "Separation of families has become a business due to Federal incentives".

This isn't conspiracy theory.  High incidence of abuse on the foster circuit and damage effects on the children it's 'served' was always well known.  Better yet just ask any adult who was put through the experience as a child or teenager themselves.


Foster parents make a living from monthly support payments per child they house.   The more they house the more they make.  The incentive is to cram as many as they can in, and spend as little on their care as possible.  While there are couples that do genuinely want to provide good care for homeless children, that's not the norm.

There is no Federal incentive for closing abusive or criminal homes. Professional (criminal) sex trade rings flourish under such circumstances. 

Nancy Schaefer's preliminary investigation included visiting  37 families of children taken away by Georgia Department of Family and Children Services.  She found a disturbing pattern of competent family members fully qualified and willing to care for the children who were not merely overlooked by caseworkers and judges - many had injunctions and threats against them to visit or even know the whereabouts of their grandchildren, or nieces and nephews.

"I had witnessed the "Gestapo" at work and I witnessed the deceitful conditions under which children were taken in the middle of the night, out of hospitals, off of school buses, and out of homes. In one county a private drug testing business was operating within the DFCS department that required many, many drug tests from parents and individuals for profit. In another county children were not removed when they were enduring the worst possible abuse."

In the course of that investigation, the Child Services workers involved seemed to be reprimanded or fired.  Checking later Schaefer found that as soon as DFCS thought the coast was clear the perps were back on the job breaking up families and trafficking new children.
Schaefer  investigated 300 more cases and decided to publicize her findings not only to her constituents in Georgia, but to the world.  She published "THE CORRUPT BUSINESS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES"  which you should download and distribute from the link below.  And she was a speaker at the World Congress of Families in Amsterdam, the Netherlands,  August 2009, (see below.)

Another state's power establishment  might have handled a loose cannon like Schaefer with more postmodern finesse.  But Georgia is old money old school masonry like Louisiana.   They think of double murder as an object lesson for Schraefer's associates, attorneys, DFCS informers and everybody else in the fight against the State sanctioned slave trade.
The mainstream media are in concert on her.  The official 'murder suicide' story is deliberately transparent.  You're not expected to believe it,  it's meant to intimidate us into forgetting what she exposed.  You will find no Wikipedia entry at all for Nancy Schaefer.

Nancy Schaefer and her husband were murdered last March for drawing attention to a criminal child   trade enterprise operating under the aegis of the Federal government. 


So please distribute Senator Shaefers' report.  She gave her life to stop these criminals.

Nancy Schaefer "The Unlimited Power of Child Protective Services" Part 1 of 2
"The Unlimited Power of Child Protective Services" Part 2 of 2


Hear attorneys who have been disbarred for filing charges of racketeering against their state CPS bureaucracies or for reporting case fixing in  local Family or Juvenile courts.

There are 'ex parte' hearings which means a judge can all in one side in a case whether it be CPS caseworkers and fosters and the parent or parents aren't even notified.

Additional CPS  exposure links

Innocence Destroyed - Part 2 - WARNING: Graphic Content

Kansas children are raped in facilities and foster car
e and the State and County wants to claim they are the protectors. Lawsuits are piling up against Social Workers, Judge, County Attorney ETC

CPS aka Child Protective Services - The 'Predators'

CPS aka Child Protective Services claims to protect children from child abuse. In reality, they are guilty of far more child abuse than they prevent. CPS traumatizes children and families by brutally tearing them apart, and torturing them, often for years on end (e.g., pretending that there will be a reunification if only the parents do as they're told). Many aid and abet CPS in their crimes against children, families and humanity: cops, forensic "experts" such as Dr. Charles Smith, judges, anonymous child abuse reporters, and so on. These false protectors, together with CPS, are part of a billion dollar child abuse industry that is destroying humanity.

Recent methods in covert ritual child sacrifice - 're-birthing "therapy"

10 year old girl pleaded for air while 4 female therapists (the-rapists)  lay on top of her till she asphyxiated to death during 're-birthing therapy'

Grandparents file suit in wrongful death of 6 year old boy suffocated by foster 'child collector'.

Note the following website irregularities and Schaefer's own online archives are gone.

Nancy Schaefer was a major contributor to Phyllis Schaffley's Eagle Forum organization and website.  Sen. Schafer also founded Eagle Forum of Georgia and website. 

That site is now inaccessible  This site now stands for the Georgia Eagle Forum founded by Schaefer - but enter her name in the search bar and it will come up empty.


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "CPS: Child Protectors or Pimps? "

Robert said (November 22, 2010):

Henry:Excellent article on the CPS.For a compleat understanding of how they are empowered,may I suggest your listeners listen to the free audio archives of George Gordon.His site is ( to the 6-2006 audio file.You can type 2006 in the search and it will take you there.Look for marriage.This is key to understanding the CPS.Shalom.

Christian said (November 22, 2010):

In October 2009 my mother was in Amsterdam at the World Congress of Families conference and was a co-speaker at the event alongside Nancy Schaefer. She knew Mrs. Schaefer somewhat well as they were leaders in the same battle but in different countries and would often cross each other's paths.

I asked my mother if she knew who Nancy Schaefer was, to which she said that she did. When I told her of the circumstances of her death my mother was shocked and saddened by the news. My mother called people that she knew that knew Mrs. Shaefer very well and asked about the circumstances and if there was any possibility that her murder was a result of her stance against the corruption in the child protection services system in the States. These people that knew her very well told my mother that, indeed, her murder by her husband was due to their family financial problems and nothing to do with her activism.

Of course this is a "he told me that she said that she said" kind of information I'm passing along to you but the kind of people my mother associate with are straight up decent people that in the face of this kind tragedy understand and know it to be a murder suicide due to financial problems.


Thanks Christian,

I'd like to see some proof of these financial problems before I accept this.


P said (November 21, 2010):

This was really disturbing to read. I don't even want to think about what they're doing to these children when they take them from their families. But it is truly an epidemic in Europe, where children are being removed from their family homes simply because their parents refuse to feed them junk food:
Absolutely frightening to think about how much control the globalists want to exercise over private households.


I forgot to include this video link in my reply about the child-snatching article. But it's very alarming and the people who are featured in it reveal some spine-chilling details about the child-snatching that's taking place in Europe, by their own government (it's not this bad in the U.S.--yet):

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at