Direct Link to Latest News


CNN Proves Rick Sanchez's Point

October 2, 2010

sanchez.jpgJews are the first to holler when they suffer discrimination; but let someone say they discriminated against him, and he's fired. Tolerance is reserved for elite Jews and their agenda. Everyone else is a bigot.


by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Jews run the US media and control perception. When Rick Sanchez said so, he was fired. Point made.

Rick Sanchez didn't understand that his role was to obscure this fact. He was Latino window dressing. He was the gentile front man. The shabbos goy.

His role was to keep the Left-Right puppet show going. But he committed the cardinal sin. He pointed to the Illuminati Jewish puppeteer.

He was sore that CNN was replacing him with "Parker-Spitzer." He was sore for being treated like the token Latino. He was sore that CNN wouldn't take him seriously and that the Jewish comedian Jon (Leibowitz) Stewart ridiculed his ambitions to be a serious commentator.

On Pete Dominick's talk show Friday, Sanchez said they were prejudiced. When Dominick suggested that Stewart is also a minority, Sanchez scoffed at the notion that Jews are  persecuted and implied that they control CNN and other networks.

"Yeah, very powerless people. [laughs] He's such a minority. I mean, you know, please. What, are you kidding? I'm telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart. And to imply that somehow they, the people in this country who are Jewish, are an oppressed minority?"

About 20% of the Jews in the Chicago area are on food stamps. Obviously we're not talking about them. We're talking about Illuminati (i.e. Masonic) Jews -- the Murdochs, the Newhouses, the Ochs-Sulzbergers, the Meyers. These are the elite Jews that secretly persecute other Jews, and everyone else.

Pete Dominick kept pressing Sanchez to give examples that CNN or Stewart were prejudiced.
This, seconds after Sanchez had told him point-blank that his CNN boss said he was just a Latino who couldn't aspire higher than to be a token reporter. His CNN boss said:

'You know what, I don't want you anchoring anymore, I really don't see you as an anchor, I see you more as a reporter, I see you more as a John Quinones - you know the guy on ABC. That's what he told me. He told me he saw me as John Quinones. Now, did he not realize that he was telling me, 'When I see you I think of Hispanic reporters'? Cause in his mind I can't be an anchor. An anchor is what you give the high-profile white guys, you know. So he knocks me down to that and compares me to that and it happens all the time i think. To a certain extent Jon Stewart and Colbert are the same way. I think Jon Stewart's a bigot."

Stewart and Colbert are dogs whose job is to keep their liberal sheep in their pen. Bill O'Reilley and the crew at Fox do the same for conservative sheep. Stewart and Colbert ridicule anyone who doesn't fit in their liberal mould, Sanchez said:

"Anybody who's different from you are. Anybody who's not from your frame of reference. Anybody who doesn't look and sound exactly like the people that you grew up with, the people that you put on your show... I mean I'm sorry but I just don't buy this thing that the only people out there who are prejudiced are the right; there's people who are prejudiced on both sides."

Stewart is "against anybody who doesn't agree to his point of view, which is very much a white liberal establishment point of view. He cant relate to a guy like me. He can't relate to a guy who's dad worked all his life. He can't relate to somebody who grew up poor."

"When you turn on a show or listen to someone's writings and they minimize you and treat you like you don't matter, like you're just a piece of-- your just a dumb, like you're a dumb jock or a dumb woman or a dumb Puerto Rican or a dumb Cuban or another dumb Mexican, which is the way I feel whenever I watch Jon Stewart."

" I don't just sit there and read the teleprompter. If I did.... Jon Stewart would never say anything about me. He'd say I'm a good good Hispanic anchor. Way to go, you've done a good job stay right there.But I am a complex human being. I'm not some some some moron to be..."

In spite of all this, Pete Dominick who used to work for Stewart, kept pressing Sanchez for examples. Earth to Pete Dominick: Sanchez is talking about how he was treated.

But apparently only his Illuminati bosses can decide who is the victim of prejudice, and who is the oppressor. And of course the oppressor can never be Illuminati Jews.

Illuminati Jews and their Masonic lackeys define the discourse in America in such a way that the spotlight is never on them and their pernicious agenda. A recent poll indicated that 57% of Americans don't trust the mass media. Let's keep Rick Sanchez's mistreatment alive and further discredit our media mind controllers.

More Jewish tolerance- Orthodox Jews Burn New Testament

It appears the remark about Jews being an oppressed minority was left out of this transcript:,1

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "CNN Proves Rick Sanchez's Point "

Dan said (October 4, 2010):

Dave Chappelle, the black comedian who walked away from a 50 million dollar contract at the peak of his television popularity has revealed that to advance in Hollywood that when the big contract is finally offered you find out it has heavy strings attached. Chappelle said a ritual submission to sodomy is required to close the deal. Since most of the men have worked for years to earn stardom, many give int. Chappelle said no, got in his car, drove to LA Ex airport, and flew to Kenya where members of his family were living, and converted to Islam.

Illuminati Hollywood has been presenting crypto-homosexuals with bizarre personality disorder all along as movie and television role models to whites, blacks, hispanics and everybody else. As Chappelle exposed, 'Stars' are all mind controlled slaves of the psycho-sado-masochist Illuminati hierarchy.
The Jewish image the networks present is actually a minority of Jews. Media Jews are of the clique of wealthy Jewish establishment families. The Larry Davids, Bill Mahers, Sarah Silvermans, Jon Stewarts conform to the politically correct Jew. Make no mistake the message is directed at Jews everywhere that this is how they're expected to think, speak, act and behave.

According to the mega-wealthy Jewish Establishment family clique Jews are expected to be Zionists that despise Christians Palestinians and Muslims, but New Age Hindu-Kabbalistic experimentation is encouraged as long as it's approved by token black role model Oprah.

In the real world a lot of Jewish people are embarrassed by some of these people and opposed to their political, racial, and religious bigotry. They don't get talk shows and sit coms.

How to break the mind control lock of a clique of Illuminati with too much money? Easy. Go cold turkey on television, cancel the cable/satellite subscription, and make an effort to go to events sponsored by people or other backgrounds, other views in your city or town. MEDIA intends to create the illusion of hopeless division and discord. The TRUTH is when people actually meet and talk with Jews, Muslims, Blacks, Whites, etc locally it doesn't take long to realize that everybody in local communities have more in common with each other than a clique of Illuminati cult generational families who dominate our minds through media.

Greg said (October 3, 2010):

Michael, I couldn't agree with you more about tuning these clowns out. My radar went off when Stewart was on Crossfire and again when Colbert was speaking at the correspondence supper, these performances were to give these shills their street creds and it's been working like a charm ever since. Take these marches they are creating...I believe they are starting to panic,the people of the world are reaching critical mass with 911 and they are going to distract us one way...or another. I agree with Colbert on one thing...I go with my gut.

V said (October 3, 2010):

I seldom agree with anything Sanchez says, but he was "right on" with this one. Unfortunately, this same kind of behaviour extends well beyond the media, say financial markets or most any place a $ is involved

Ted said (October 3, 2010):

i must say that i didnt like the man since the whole Elian Gonzales affair.he used to work for a local fox station right here in south Florida then. and the man wasn't really impartial at the beginning he seemed cozy with the Gonzales family and the boy staying.... but oh boy after that raid he made a 360 and started
talking crap about the whole incident.thats why i think he was promoted to a better job over there on CNN.

Michael said (October 3, 2010):

In my view, the whole purpose for Jon (Leibowitz) Stewart and Steven Colbert is to deflect any serious attention from whatever the important issues there are for the day. For instance, if people start demanding a real, independent investigation of 911, Jon and Steven start ridiculing the subject matter, turning it into comedy that should not be taken seriously; anything but the "official" story should be dismissed as a joke. George Bush wasn't the most dangerous man in America, he was a buffoon that became the eternal punch line.

People saw this and started laughing at Bush instead of paying attention to the damage he was doing to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And when Stewart gets on a soap box and actually does start criticizing and pointing out the truth, people see this and think "Heck, Jon's taking care of the situation [which he never does], so I don't have to pay attention", or they view it as just another schtick. When Colbert came before CONgress to testify about the ongoing illegal alien invasion in this country, it was to turn the issue into comedy. It's not a serious subject, it's comedy! I fell for this deflection for years, but finally saw The Daily Show and The Colbert Report for what they really were: window dressing in a hall of mirrors. I haven't watched either show for about a year now, and don't intend to go back. I recommend everyone follow suit. They have no power unless we give it to them.

Scott said (October 2, 2010):

You just have easily run a smilar article a few weeks back. Oliver Stone opened a can of worms by actually uttering the phrase "Jewish-dominated media." The response, of course, was harsh and swift. He had to read or sign an apology, which was no doubt drafted at ADL headquarters. Even more amazing, a column appeared in the Wall Street Journal referencing the incident. Turns out that a bigwig at CBS named Moonves phoned up his fellow tribesman at Showtime, where Stone was supposed to have a series premier in the near future. Do the behind-the-scenes actions not prove the point?

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at