Direct Link to Latest News


How the Catholic Church Was Hijacked

April 18, 2011

54e57bd535be.jpgCardinal Giuseppe Siri, left, was duly elected Pope in 1958 and took the name Gregory XVII. However he was forced to step aside in a coup d'etat.

Popes John XXIII and Paul VI "were not simply "bad popes". They were enemy agents who set the Church on a carefully designed plan to destruction."

by Thomas Carter

There was coup d'etat in the Catholic Church on October 26th, 1958 and the Church has been governed by impostors since that time.

Is this really that important? In my opinion it is. The Catholic Church is the largest and oldest institution on earth, with roughly a billion nominal members, roughly 3 times the population of the United States.

Since 1958 however, despite the numbers, the institution has been largely ineffective in combating the social ills they had so effectively handled for centuries.

Abortion, pornography, divorce, obscenity all became prominent after the papal chair was usurped in 1958. To demonstrate the power of the Church before this, look at the time when Pius XII excommunicated President Peron of Argentina in 1955 when he tried to contradict the constitution and allow divorce.

As a result of the excommunication, the populace of Argentina rose up and Peron was removed from office and Catholic teaching was upheld.  Who would have thought that 50 years later Argentina would be legalizing "gay marriage."
Also, for those familiar with Catholicism you may know that the original Mass, which can be traced back to the 4th century (but could very well be apostolic in origin), was abandoned in 1969 to make way for a "new mass," a ceremony that bears little resemblance to the traditional Mass.

Again, who would want to destroy the sacred rite but an enemy agent masquerading as Pope.

Part 8  The Destruction of the Mass

To find out why the "Catholic" Church of today has become a sick caricature of the Catholic Church of two millennia we have to look back to the papal conclave of 1958. I believe the documentary posted below will provide the key to understanding what has happened.
At the center of the film is the election of the conservative prelate, Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, in 1958.

You will see a very clear emission of white smoke from the Sistine Chapel 2 days before the election of John XXIII.

On this night, 200,000 people turned to the balcony to see the new pope emerge on the balcony while news reports went out around the world that a new pope had been elected.

Vatican radio later announced that the white smoke was a mistake and that no Pope had been elected. A FBI Consultant claimed there are FBI and State Department files which stated that Cardinal Siri was elected Pope and took the name Gregory XVII.

In addition, former papal adviser Father Malachi Martin gives his testimony that Cardinal Siri was elected and was put under duress in at least 2 if not 3 conclaves. This is the centerpiece of the film (part 4) which is about 10 minutes.

The very clear signal that a pope had been elected 2 days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony is very suspicious, but in itself does not provide enough reason to believe that the Chair of Peter was stolen. To arrive at a clear conclusion regarding this one, must take several things into account.

Historical Precedents

The papacy does get usurped. In the history of the Catholic Church the papacy has been usurped more than 40 times, which is easily verifiable by getting a list of anti-popes. In the movie we highlight the case of Innocent II who was elected pope and then forced to flee by an impostor pope, Anacletus II. Anacletus II ruled for 8 years until his death, upon which, Innocent ascended to the papal throne many years late. Anacletus and all the clergy ordained by him were then condemned at the second Lateran Council.

The Men Who Took Over

The men who took office instead of Cardinal Siri, namely John XXIII ( Angelo Roncalli) and Paul VI (Giovanni Montini) we're more just bad apples.

John XXIII's Masonic initiation is described in detail in Pier Carpi's book, "The Prophecies of John XXIII" and there is a vast amount of evidence and testimony that he was indeed a Mason. For this alone he would be ipso facto excommunicated and obviously ineligible for the Papacy.

Upon his election, he immediately made Montini (future Paul VI) a Cardinal and called the Second Vatican Council, two of the most disastrous decisions in the history of the Catholic Church. He also received Nikita Khrushchev's son-in-law and daughter at the Vatican in a private meeting, this after communist regimes murdered and imprisoned millions of Catholics.

 The well publicized meeting earned an extra million votes for the Communist party in Italy in the national elections. He also began introducing changes to the Mass that would culminate in the complete destruction of the Tridentine Mass under Paul VI.

Part 5 Who was John XXIII?

Paul VI, who never spent so much as a day a parish priest before becoming Pope, enjoyed reading books by Oscar Wilde during his seminary days. This wouldn't seem so bad if it weren't for the multiple public accusations of sodomy against him that emerged during and after his pontificate.

If this wasn't bad enough, ex-member of the Vatican noble guard Franco Bellegrandi recounts in his book Nikita Roncalli that Pius XII conducted a secret investigation and found out that Montini, then secretary of state, was providing names of priests operating behind the iron curtain to the Soviet secret police. The priests were then shot or sent to the gulag.

 Part 7 Who was Paul VI?
Indeed these two men were not simply "bad popes". They were enemy agents who set the Church on a carefully designed plan to destruction.

Once the treachery of these two men has been established, the 3 week period between the death of Pius XII (a true pope) and the so-called election of John XXIII (an impostor) become crucial.

 Did anything significant happen between these two dates? Yes, there was a five-minute signal indicating a pope had been elected billowing out of the Sistine Chapel two days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony in St. Peter's Square.  Was the true pope elected on this night, and was he Cardinal Siri? I'll point to three sources that say he was.

FBI informant Paul Williams in his book, The Vatican Exposed quotes State Department files that state Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected and took the name Gregory XVII on Sunday October 26th but the French Cardinal annulled the results.

Fr. Malachi Martin in an interview in the late nineties says that Siri got enough votes to become Pope but refused the office because they thought they would not let him live.

Father Charles-Roux claims that Joseph Cardinal Siri of Genoa had been elected and also accepted the Papal office, but a very serious threat was delivered by the dean of the College of Cardinals. Siri was immediately shoved aside, without actually abdicating.

Here we have three people claiming that Cardinal Siri was elected and was subject to some kind of threat. This along with Cardinal Siri's indirect admissions that he was elected pope make a very good case that he was elected when the white smoke emerged on October 26th , 1958 was Cardinal Giuseppe Siri of Genoa.

Furthermore there is a great deal of evidence that Cardinal Roncalli and the whole 1958 affair was planned by unholy forces, which is described in Part 3 of the film.

Part II The Chosen Candidate

Somehow people expect the forces of darkness to provide a detailed explanation of how they did it.

Others expect that Siri would come out and claim that he was pope, when obviously nobody would believe it, even if did manage to get the word out before being eliminated. By remaining quiet, he was allowed to die a natural death in 1989.

The film will give some basic instructions on how to find traditional churches, priests, catechisms, etc and a word on activism.

Part XII The Underground Church

The film is otherwise broken down into 12 parts, the subject matter of each part described in the title.

Part 1 Historical Precedents
Part 2 October 1958
Part 3 The Chosen Candidate
Part 4 The 1958 Conclave
Part 5 Who was John XXIII?
Part 6 The 1963 Conclave
Part 7 Who was Paul VI?
Part 8 The Destruiction of the Mass
Part 9 Year of Two Conclaves
Part 10 Cardinal Siri Confronted
Part 11 Conclusion
Part 12 The UndergroundChurch


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "How the Catholic Church Was Hijacked "

Gary said (April 19, 2011):

It seems the Illuminati will try to use most any institution they can to help further their agenda, political, religious, economical, major media, public schools, ect. and it is amazing how the average citizen is not aware of it. Now I do not doubt that there are still many sincere Catholic folk following that tradition, and I do not doubt that the Illuminati have further entrenched themselves in places of power in that institution, but serious research will show that that institution did not really come about till a few hundered years after the day of Pentecost, and research will show that that institution is hybrid of Babylonianism and Christianity, this is not meant to offend, only to alert the sincere folk to do some research and learn the truth.

There are some helpful web pages that go into more detail - and and also realize that the Catholic institution is not the only group that is being used by the NWO, the Illuminati has been using many groups to further their Luciferian globalist agenda.

Consider that the Jehovah Witness group seems to have Freemason beginnings, and the Mormons also are very NWO in their agenda. We need to research carefully to make sure we are aware of any and all deceptions, for the truth is a must, according to the Bible it is not enough to just be sincere.

Andrew said (April 19, 2011):

Keep telling yourselves that the Catholic Church was infiltrated by bad apples when it was invented by them. In any case it would have been more accurate to describe the Catholic Church as a two-millennia old sick caricature of Christian Gnosticism – the product of a politically cynical and theologically schizophrenic fusion of the Marcionite and Jewish Adoptionist sects.

You are free to believe as you choose, but don’t pretend that there is an originally pure and true Catholic tradition. Like a giant chameleon she has always adapted to the political climate: democratic and communitarian among the early Greek converts, regimented and militaristic like a good Roman soldier during the barbarian invasions, a model of parasitism and blackmail during the feudal system, sudden patriots in the years of fascist-corporate conscription and, finally, liberal democratic reformists in the post-war technological society. She usually lags behind the sociological mainstream a few years, but like a good Babylonian harlot she has been ‘all things to all men.’

Dan said (April 19, 2011):

On the hijacking of the HRCC, there's no doubt about it.

What we have now isn't the Catholic religion of a century ago, much less the organization.

Sede vacante is the canon law term 'vacant seat' in reference to episodes in Church history when 'antipopes' were in charge.

The most famous was Rodrigo Borgia, patriarch of the notorious Borgia family. Rodrigo was poisoned, the prime suspects remain his daughter - the infamous seductress and poisoner Lucrezia, one of his sons, or a conspiracy of the two. An incest jealousy triangle in this family of psychopaths was involved. As Rodrigo obtained the Papacy through sheer terror his is listed as one of the HRCC's 30+ illegitimate popes.

The Conciliary Church is the term for the councils of clerics that supported antipopes while they were in power. (Think, Vichy Government...) Since 1958 and Vatican II especially a substantial number of clerics, religious, and congregations left the mainstream Catholic Church over the clumsy usurpation of the Papacy by Freemasons. They call themselves Sedevacantists.

There's a sticky and complicated matter for Catholic Christians, who believe Jesus appointed his disciple Peter to create a world church or network of believers.

In Catholicism the passing down of this authority is called Apostolic Succession, and is essential to ordination of bishops and priests all the way down the line.

I actually remember that the story about the smoke suspiciously changing to black in 1958 because it greatly upset my grandfather, for whom that was the last straw and he completely lost any faith he may have had left.

But far worse than a Freemasonic Pope was the hurried 2nd Vatican Council, 1962-65 which trashed the Latin Mass.

None of that happened over night. The old order of Catholic Europe was overturned by Freemasonry in the 18th and 19th centuries, and finished off by Freemasonry and Communists in the 20th.

I've just watched enough of the Youtube videos Papal Impostors The Underground Church and endorse especially the advice 12/12. The Faith and the faithful are what matter a lot more than the Vatican and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. There are too many key bishops and bureaucracy who are in Apostasy. That's no different than the situation with our Masonic 'democratic' governments. They don't represent us.

Dean said (April 18, 2011):

In regards to the article How the Catholic Church Was Hijacked, it must be noted that Cardinal Siri went along with the Second Vatican Council, as well he said the New Mass. As far as I can tell there were only two Bishops in the Church who did not go along with the high jacking of the Church during the Second Vatican Council. They were Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Bishop Antonio De Castro Mayer. Bishop De Castro Mayer's story can be read in the book, The Mouth of the Lion.

For all those interested in practicing the traditional Catholic Faith, Archbishop Lefebvre started the Society of St. Pius the Tenth. Many mass centres of the society can be found throughout Canada and the U.S.

Both Bishops were excommunicated by the Vatican hierarchy because of their stance against the Second Vatican Council and for adhering the practices of the Traditional Catholic Church. Cardinal Siri was never excommunicated as he did not fight against the changes in the Church in an open or forceful manner.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at