The Putin Deception (2)
November 24, 2017
As it becomes increasingly clear the West is controlled by
Satanists, our hopes increasingly rest on Russia's Putin
who, in contrast, seems like the paragon of sanity and goodness.
He thwarted the Zionist takeover of Syria and destroyed
the barbaric Zionist proxy, ISIS. However, Andy Sloan believes
all this is a deception and that Russia (and China) plan to
attack and conquer the West.
Is this scenario far-fetched? Why socially engineer us if they plan to destroy us?
(To make us more vulnerable?) In any case, Putin's bona fides need to be scrutinized carefully.
"When lies have been accepted for some time, the truth always astounds with an air of novelty." -- St. Clement of Alexandria
Andy Sloan is a management consultant and traditional Catholic from England. He believes 'all history is theology.'
by Andy Sloan
In Part I, I presented evidence that Vladimir Putin's Christianity/morality is fake and Russia remains communist. Indeed, for residual doubters, Putin admitted publicly last year: "I was not, as you know, a (communist) party member by necessity.I liked Communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still." (1)
Putin's stand is founded in the final phase of a long-range plan to facilitate political, economic, institutional and cultural convergence (synthesis) with the West. In 'The Perestroika Deception', Anatoliy Golitsyn described Mikael Gorbachev as "a Leninist, chosen and trained by the Soviet strategists to engineer the defeat of the United States and the West generally through the use of false, controlled democracy and a specious capitalism." And so it continues with Putin.
Mr. Golitsyn further states;
"The final objective of this strategy is Sino-Russian world domination. In order to achieve their final goal, Russia, after lulling America to sleep, will join with China in order to attack the United States."
For trenchant research into this strategy, readers should study the work of J R Nyquist. It is vital that people understand this, because as Mr Nyquist elucidates, it is clear Russia and China are priming for an attack. (2)
Now, for many, this deception alone is much to digest, but there is a plot of a higher dimension than this. Understanding was given in Part 1 with the words of Congressman Larry McDonald;
"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and communism under the same tent, Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. International in scope, generations old in planning and incredibly evil in intent."
As demonstrated by Professor Anthony Sutton in regard to Russia (3) and James Corbett in respect of China (including a connection between Mao Zedong and Skull & Bones) (4), the East has been built up by Western banking and corporate interests. Why? Primarily to militarize them to enable them to engage the West in a WW3, which will become the cataclysm to justify the creation of a One World Government in the horrifying aftermath.
As Myron Fagan revealed (5);
"In 1848, Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto, under the direction of one group of Illuminists, while Professor Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University wrote the anti-thesis, under the direction of another group of Illuminists. The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences of those two so-called ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger members of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other."
CHANGE OF PLANS
But the globalists did modify their plan for the reasons given above by Anatoliy Golitysn, so as to facilitate an easier accommodation between West and East after WW3.
And it should be noted that socialism and communism are simply tools for bringing about a global despotism -
Excerpts from a Jewish meeting in Paris as reported in the Catholic Gazette 1936 (6);
"We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape! We have given them new theories, impossible of realization, such as Communism, Anarchism, and Socialism, which are now serving our purpose. The stupid Gentiles have accepted them with the greatest enthusiasm, without realizing that those theories are ours and that they constitute our most powerful instrument against themselves. And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World."
And in our times, it has been the usual suspects working front-of-house, to advance the plan. As Charlotte Isybert reported (7);
"In the mid-seventies when the SALT II (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) was being discussed by the U.S. Senate, the author of this article (Iserbyt) arranged for a Soviet defector by the name of Igor Glagolev to come to Maine to participate in a debate with Secretary of Defense Paul Warnke. This debate was arranged by Maine's Chamber of Commerce. Glagolev did a superb job presenting reasons why the United States should not sign onto this Treaty. At dinner, the same evening Glagolev informed me that prior to his defection, when he held a very high position in the Kremlin, he sat in on meetings at which David Rockefeller Sr. and Henry Kissinger were often present."
And as Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of a meeting in 2016;
"The meeting is a continuation of a friendly dialogue between President Putin and Henry Kissinger, who are bound by a long-standing relationship. They communicate all the time."
And here he is with President Xi;
And David Rockefeller - 'Memoirs' 2003: "Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
The plan for three world wars is well known to truthers through various sources - the infamous letter of Albert Pike; the Zionist Congress of Basel in 1897 as revealed by the late Eustace Mullins and as testified by the ex-jew and Catholic convert Benjamin Freedman. WW3 is also foreseen in Catholic prophecy, most vividly by St Odile in the 7th Century (8).
But given the devastation of modern weapons, how can we suppose the attainability of a One World Government after WW3, as this would require a deep control infrastructure? This is possible if the war strategy has been devised in advance between East and West.
As Otto Khan, a Kuhn Loeb partner stated after WW1, the bankers "re-make the world by creating artificial conflicts and determining the outcome." And as Anthony Sutton discovered, certain prime military targets in Germany were not bombed during WW2, because they were American corporate interests (9).
Hence, we can reasonably speculate that the course of WW3 will be of predesign and that substantive control infrastructure will remain in place in view to merge it globally after the war. And in further proof, in forward planning, we can see the post-WW3 governmental architecture has already been configured.
And in further proof, in forward planning, we can see the post-WW3 governmental architecture has already been configured.
2) J R Nyquist website.
The Strategic Significance of 'Russia ... - J.R. Nyquist
The Strategic Significance of "Russia Hacking the Election" Commentary for 18 August 2017 . The political preparation of the morale of the people is of decisive ...
3) Jon Rappoport - 'Here's what real US-Russian collusion looks like.'
4) James Corbett - China and the New World Order.
7) Charlotte Isybert - 'Kissinger out of the closet'.
8) Of World War 3.
9) Designed Wars.
You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/11/The-Putin-Deception-2.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at