Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Men Face a Masculinity Minefield- Scroll Down

Civilization Depends on Sexual Constraints - Anthropologist

January 19, 2017

(left. That is Freud's pic. None available for J.D. Unwin, 1895-1936)

Joseph Daniel (J.D.) Unwin was an Oxford university social anthropologist 
whose research on 80 primitive tribes and six civilizations 
revealed that societies that practiced heterosexual monogamy 
were far more successful. 

Satanists know this. 

"If the British anthropologist J. D. Unwin is correct in his assessment of society, this present generation in the Western world may be the last one. In his book, Sex and Culture, (pdf) professor Unwin studied eighty 'uncivilized' cultures and compared his results with sixteen 'civilized' cultures extending over the last 4,000 years. He found that when strict heterosexual monogamy was practiced, the society attained its greatest cultural energy, especially in the arts, sciences and technology. But as people rebelled against the prohibitions placed upon them and demanded more sexual opportunities, there was a consequent loss of their creative energy, which resulted in the decline and eventual destruction of the civilization. Remarkably, he did not find any exception to this trend."
--Janosik, Daniel. "The Fate of Culture in J. D. Unwin's 'Sex and Culture'" in Christian Apologetics Journal,
 Vol. 10:1 (Spring 2012)

"Unwin's conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity."
--Huxley, Aldous (1946). "Ethics" in Ends and Means, Chatto & Windus, pp. 311-12.

"Unwin concluded that the fabric that holds a society together is sexual in nature. When life-long heterosexual monogamous relationship is practiced, the focus is on the nurture of the family and energy is expended to protect, plan for, and build up the individual family unit. This extends to the entire society and produces a strong society focused on preserving the strength of the family. However, he found that when sexual opportunities opened the door to pre-marital, post-marital, and homosexual relationships, the social energy always dissipated as the individual focused more on self-gratification rather than societal good."
--Janosik, Daniel. "The Fate of Culture in J. D. Unwin's 'Sex and Culture'" in Christian Apologetics Journal,
 Vol. 10:1 (Spring 2012)


In March, 2014, federal District Judge Aleta Trauger ruled that Tennessee must recognize as valid the same-sex marriage of three couples that moved here after being married in a state that allows same-sex marriage. In so ruling, she noted the "rising tide" of support for same-sex marriage. It is a rising tide, but it is one that will wash away more things than the institution of marriage....

The state, in its brief in support of Tennessee's definition of marriage as one man and one woman, tried to tell Judge Trauger that to rule against the state was "an affront to its sovereignty" and would make our public policy on marriage "subservient to that of other states." She apparently didn't care....

Consider the fact that a federal judge in Utah has already taken the first step toward validating polygamous marriages. According to Judge Trauger's rationale, Tennessee may one day have to accept and validate polygamous marriages. There is no other conclusion she can reach. And who knows what California may come up with some day?

download (83).jpeg
To assert that judges, by redefining marriage, are washing away civilization itself seems ludicrous. But the research of Dr. J.D. Unwin, professor of ethnology and social anthropology at Oxford and Cambridge, suggests that one should proceed slowly in rejecting that possibility.

Dr. Unwin wrote:  "Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation."

In other words, the energy it takes to create and maintain a great civilization does not exist in a society that has chosen to "enjoy sexual freedom."

His research also showed that societies that rest on sexual freedom never recover their civilizing energy: "In human records there is no instance of a society retaining its energy after a complete new generation has inherited a tradition which does not insist on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial continence."

Of course, in describing "nuptial," Dr. Unwin was not considering same-sex nuptials inasmuch as those relationships were (and still are) inherently sterile, incapable of even producing a "next generation."

Sadly, the polls show millennials overwhelmingly reject a monogamous sexual ethic.

The bottom line is that a civilized society's days are numbered if it rejects a sexual ethic that values sexual restraint and monogamy.

So, contrary to what Judge Trauger and the proponents of same-sex marriage want us to believe, those who want to redefine marriage to fit their no-boundaries sexual ethic are the ones on the "wrong side of history."
Thanks to Louie for the tip!

First Comment from Jennifer:

The famous ancient play Bacchae from Euripides tells the timeless universal truth and lesson -of man's/society's downfall when it lifts sexual restraint distorting the balance between Dionysian energy - wild, crazy, addictive behavior and Apollonian energy -restrained, controlled, rational behavior.  When Dionysian energy is channeled into Art and creative endeavors societies flourish. When Dionysian energy is channeled into sexual "freedom" i.e. deviant sex addictions its a dog chasing its tail - a narcissistic dead-end.
I feel we are past the tipping point as too many people just demand their right to have sex whenever with whoever. One 80 year old feminist woman, that is concerned about equality, told me: "Young women should enjoy premarital sex just as much as men" and "If men get to cheat on their wives then wives have a right to go out and cheat on their husbands too."  
I tried to explain that because of oxytocin bonding a young woman can not simply enjoy multiple sex partners. But she was so disconnected/dissociated/demonized the only thing that mattered was getting an orgasm.  

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Civilization Depends on Sexual Constraints - Anthropologist"

Peter R said (January 20, 2017):

Quote: "Remarkably, he did not find any exception to this trend."

Unwin should have looked further afield. The book gets criticized for not including the Cheyenne and others that had prohibition of pre-nuptial sex, yet didn't reach the status of a temple building civilization. That's at least one fly in the ointment.

Of course, the church would embrace a work like this... and cultural Marxists rip it.

It is an interesting topic, and someone should check the real truth behind it. It's easy to throw apples that are not red out of a basket, and then say, look all apples are red.
If the Cheyenne are the only exception, and otherwise Unwin's conclusions are at least by and large true, then this is still an important book.

Lucas said (January 20, 2017):

Much of contemporary liberalism is founded on a lack of basic personal integrity and honesty. If you can get a person to compromise their personal integrity and honesty in return for sex, then you’ve gone a good distance toward compromising their integrity and morality enough to become leftists or anything else.

-R.L. Kocher

Mike said (January 19, 2017):

Just like Pope Leo XIII said.




Below- Trump & The Masonic Jewish Tag Team (scroll down)

Men Face a Masculinity Minefield

January 18, 2017

(Hypocrisy. Can you imagine a workshop entitled "Challenging Toxic Homosexuality?")

"In case you haven't noticed, 
there's a non-stop assault 
on masculinity in America." 

A survey of the social landscape faced by men today 
from the perspective of an average male. Unfortunately, he is oblivious to
and homosexual nature. 
getting and exercising it honorably. 

by Jon Hawkins 
(abridged by 

Men have it rougher in America than most people realize. In part, that's because they're one of the few groups (along with white people, conservatives and Christians) it's cool to crap on at every opportunity. 

In case you haven't noticed, there's a non-stop assault on masculinity in America. Here are articles written that show up on the first three pages of Google when you do a search for "masculinity."

Mass Killings in the U.S.: Masculinity, Masculinity, Masculinity

Die Like a Man: The Toxic Masculinity of Breaking Bad

Why We Need to Reimagine Masculinity

Masculinity Is Killing Men: The Roots of Men and Trauma ...

Journeys Through Trans Masculinity - BuzzFeed

Toxic masculinity - Geek Feminism Wiki

Masculinity U | Rethink Masculinity.

How Feminists Can Do More to Fight Toxic Masculinity ..

Masculinity isn't toxic, doesn't cause mass killings and it doesn't need to be reimagined or rethought. Furthermore, this "masculinity is bad" mentality is driven by failed "men" and more importantly, liberal feminists. These women want men to be easily-controlled, neutered lapdogs and then they wonder why they keep getting bored with beta eunuchs who are supposedly everything they want.

Meanwhile, good women who haven't turned into bitter, hyper-sensitive, man-hating witches end up wondering where all the "real" men have gone and why they're stuck trying to sort through guys who have no ambition, play videogames eight hours a day or don't seem to care about anything other than getting in their pants.

The sad truth is that men, like all people, tend to do what they're rewarded for doing and avoid situations that punish them. The cultural changes over the last fifty years have hit "real" men particularly hard.

There was a time when a man without a college education could work hard and make enough money to take care of himself, a wife and a couple of kids. He might not have had much, but his wife treated him like a king and he could take pride in the fact that he was taking care of his family.

Fast forward to 2015 and because of computers, automation, shipping containers and the lowered cost of world transport, those men can barely take care of themselves, much less a wife and kids. Furthermore, because we dole out so much money in welfare, in many cases a woman and her kids may be better off without a man in the house.

Then what happens to those young men who are struggling to grow up without a male role model in the house? How many punks are there in street gangs today who will spend their whole life in and out of jail? Now, how many of them would have grown up to be good and decent men if they had a "dad" who cared in the house? It's hard to say, but you have to think more than half of them would have turned out to be productive citizens if they had a strong male role model watching over them.

Getting beyond that, what women want out of a man has changed. It used to be that they wanted a "good" man who'd take care of them financially and treat them well.

Now, more women are going to college. More women have careers. More women don't need a man to take care of them. Those are all good things, but they also undercut a woman's need to get married and more importantly, stay married.

Suddenly, a man may find that a woman he once would have married, won't talk to him because she's more educated. She also doesn't need him to take care of her. She's making her own money and even if she loses her job, the government will take care of her. Even if they do make it past that and get in a relationship, he finds he's not the king of the castle; he's in a partnership. That's certainly not a bad thing, but even as someone who loves strong, successful, intelligent women, I have to admit it's a step down from what most men used to have.

 Not every man will admit it, but with all other things being equal, the overwhelming majority of men would vastly prefer to be with a humble waitress who thinks he's the best thing walking than an accomplished female CEO who just sees him as an acceptable man to have as a partner in marriage.

Additionally, there's no longer a big stigma against divorce and the courts are slanted against men.

So imagine dating a woman who's making as much money as you, who just decides she doesn't want to be married anymore, takes your kids away from you and then to add insult to injury, you have to pay this woman who broke your heart and took your kids, your hard earned money every month while she sleeps with some other guy in a house that the two of you used to share. Almost every man reading this knows other men in this situation and because it's so common, it makes the potential cost of entering into a marriage considerably higher for a man than it used to be.


Even if you navigate that minefield, which a lot of men do, we now live in an overly feminized society. At any time, some pathetic losers who spend their time obsessing over "microaggressions" and "trigger" words can ruin you if they hear a joke they don't like. Imagine that: a whole lifetime of blood, sweat and tears ruined by one joke, one comment, one Facebook share that a bunch of miserable failures don't like.

Meanwhile, you and a woman both do a little drinking and have consensual sex; then, Uh-oh, you "raped her" because both of you were drunk, but you're the "rapist" because you're male and she changed her mind about whether having sex with you was a good idea.

If you buy a gun legally and learn how to use it because you want to be ready to protect yourself and your family, then you're a dangerous bad guy responsible for the actions of criminals and mental cases because liberal w*ssies wet their pants every time they look at a gun.

Want to hunt? Then you'll be chastised for killing an animal by a bunch of idiots who'll probably go eat a hamburger right after they're done.

Are you a poor man? Then politicians treat you like an idiot who needs to be led around by the hand because you're too stupid to take care of yourself. Are you a successful man? Then you're one of those greedy, evil people who are supposedly ruining America.

Turn on the TV? Then you'll find most dads presented as hapless bumblers who are led around by their wives or saved by their kids.

Are you a man who thinks you should get paid more than a woman who doesn't work as hard as you, doesn't work as long as you, or doesn't produce as much as you? Well, then, you're a sexist pig who's trying to keep women down.

Do you think real courage that deserves to be admired is watered down by lauding every chubby model, every man who wants to pretend he's a woman and every celebrity who kicks an addiction as courageous? Then not only are you sexist; you're insensitive!

Do you think a woman should have to meet the same standards as a man to do the same dangerous job? Again, sexist pig! What if you think that even if women meet the same standards as a male policeman or soldier, they shouldn't be put in the line of fire because there are going to be very few of them who can do it, they're more likely to be injured and other men will take suicidal risks to rescue them because it's a man job to protect and shield women? Well, that's even worse! You're really sexist if you go there.

Meanwhile, as all of this is going on, we live in a country where the government is spending so much that it's practically a given that we're going to have a debt-driven depression in the future, Medicare and Social Security will cease to exist in their current form and it seems like we're taking in any and every uneducated, illegal third-worlder who wants to come here, have a kid and get on welfare so people like you can pay more in taxes to carry them along on your back for the next 18 years.

That's the world a 20 year old millennial man is growing up in and there's no point in complaining about it. After all, what are you going to say? "Life's not fair." That's the ultimate loser's complaint. "Life isn't fair" for anybody; so forget about complaining, but it is worth taking the time to understand what you're going to have to deal with to achieve the successful, productive life you're going to want as a man....

Thanks to Sarah for the tip!

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Men Face a Masculinity Minefield "

Doug P said (January 19, 2017):

I know a lot of young men who feel completely dis-empowered because they don't have a job. They try and they work hard. More and more people are going to be afflicted by this as time goes on. I was successfully self employed and gave it up when I learned about this conspiracy because I didn't want to be a contributor to my own destruction (income tax stolen and used against me). I was single then and am now.

I live a very minimalist lifestyle now and many would feel dis-empowered by this. I have difficult goals, I set them and I meet them regularly, whether it is reading Kant, writing fictional books, making a YouTube video, or studying mathematics, having a goal and meeting that goal can make you feel empowered and confident and happy. Having power can mean educating yourself and creating abilities, which cannot be stolen from you. Anyone can do this, it can be Karate or reading history. Being a man means having discipline. Having discipline and abilities earns respect and self respect. Having abilities is masculine.

I will be a money maker if things change.

Fortunately women are doing a great job telling us about what damage feminism is doing to us.

Below- 9-11 Truthers Part of the Cover Up? (scroll down)

Trump & The Masonic Jewish Tag Team

January 17, 2017

(On the left, Communist Jewish Gulag commandants in the USSR. On the right, Zionist Jewish pioneers at Kibbutz Gan Shmuel in 1921. Both are making the classic Masonic hand sign.) 

A pattern reminiscent of pre-war Germany
has emerged in the US and Europe. 
There is intensifying conflict between  
"Left" (globalism) and "Right," (nationalism)
which are each backed by a Masonic Jewish faction, Communism and Zionism. These two in fact are one

Trump belongs to the Zionist faction. Does this portend another war? 

By Henry Makow Ph.D. 

What is Donald Trump's place in the big picture? 

Trump is a Freemason and probably a crypto Jew. He is surrounded by Jews. The Masonic Jewish (Illuminati) goal is the reduction of the human race (goyim) to the status of domestic animals serving the elite. We see this emergent pattern in the gross disparities of wealth  in today's world. 

The Illuminati advance this agenda through mind control (mass media, education) and war. They can't subjugate humanity alone; they need the goyim to destroy each other.  "War is revolutionary," insider Chaim Rakofski said. 

Thus, they have developed a tag team to promote war. On the one hand, we have the Communist Jews ("globalist") who attack the goyim by undermining their national, religious (moral), racial and family (gender) identity. On the other hand, are the Fascists, Nazis or Zionist ("nationalist") Jews, who pretend to defend the goyim from this onslaught. Trump won election by appealing to the latter demography. 

From a different angle, we have a conflict between philo-Semitic Masonic Jews (Communists) and "anti-Semitic" Masonic Jews (Fascists, Nazis, Zionists.) While claiming to defend Jews, Zionism creates anti Semitism (and false flag terror) to coerce Jews into serving their megalomaniacal agenda. 

Similarly, they use false flag terror to herd the goyim. The goy elite has been decimated in wars contrived by the Illuminati. The goy vestige has been coopted with promises that they will share in the spoils. 
In  Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), author Lenni Brenner claims that Zionists have always betrayed the Jewish masses, whose interests were, in reality, defended by the Bolsheviks and their heirs, the Trotskyists; and that during the 1930s and 1940s all branches of Zionism collaborated with the fascists and Nazis. (27-37)  

The conflict between the Communists and the Zionist Masonic factions ensures perpetual war.  

Zionism is not only about a Jewish state; it is about a Jewish world-order. The same applies to Communism: "social justice" is a ruse. The Jew World Order will be achieved by pitting the goyim against each other. Most Jews are not aware of this. They would gladly assimilate but, like the goyim, they have been tricked into supporting Zionism or Communism. 

Arnold J. Toynbee was a propagandist for the Cecil Rhodes' Round Table group, i.e. the Communist (globalist) faction. 

He wrote, "Judaism is a development of the Pre-Exilic religion of Judah that was created in and by the Babylonian diaspora and was imposed by it on the Jewish population in Judaea. ... There has also been the aim of converting the gentile world to the worship of Yahweh under the aegis of a world-empire centred on Eretz Israel and ruled by 'the Lord's Anointed': a coming human king of Davidic lineage." (Reconsiderations, 1961, p. 486).

"The guilt - or merit - of having put Jesus to death is ascribed in the Talmud to the Jews, not to the Romans." (p. 481)  In other words, Cabalist (Masonic) Judaism is Satanic.

There are many signs that the Nazism was funded by Zionist Jews.  For example, Churchill said ex-German Chancellor (1930-1932) Heinrich Brüning  revealed  the identities of Hitler's backers in a 1937 letter:  'I didn't, and do not even today for understandable reasons, wish to reveal from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany." 

download (84).jpeg

Barack Obama is a toady and lickspittle for George Soros and the Communist Jewish faction.  "Communist" Jews are in the forefront of the hysterical opposition to Donald Trump, threatening an ongoing campaign of civil disobedience and worse. Thus we have a situation similar to Weimar Germany where Communist and Nazis fought each other in the streets, and later Communists and homosexuals were rounded up. 
Apart from Trump's unqualified support for Israel, many indications suggest Trump is in the Zionist camp described above. His "chief strategist" Steve Bannon is from, a probable Mossad front which defined Trump's anti migrant, anti-Iran, anti free trade and pro Russia policy. See Makow "Have Americans Been NeoConned?"  

Uber Zionist Sheldon Adelson is reported to have promised Trump $100 million for his election campaign.

Then there are the dog whistles.  Trump's extremely effective final campaign commercial pictured Janet Yellin and implied that Trump would "drain the swamp" by attacking the Fed and Goldman Sachs.  An earlier ad attacking Clinton corruption featured a Star of David. The Commie Jew faction was quick to assert that Trump represents "white supremacists."   (Indeed, any attempt to defend traditional America is equated with "hate.") 
All the European populist "far right" parties seem to be lining up behind Zionism  while the globalist anti-Putin factions are in the Communist Jewish (Soros) camp.   The latter flooded Europe with Muslim migrants. Now thanks to Zionist false flag terror, Europeans are identifying with Israel.


Recently 70 nations beholden to the Communist Jew agenda held a meeting in Paris which could be interpreted as anti Zionist because it held up hope for a two-nation solution to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. 

Netanyahu dismissed this as the last vestige of a dying era. "This conference belongs to yesterday's world. Tomorrow's world will be different -- and it is very near." 

What does "tomorrow's world" look like?  Putin, like Stalin, is a nationalist. I see Israel, Russia, the UK and the US drawing closer together. 
Who will the Communists line up against them? They are still extremely powerful in the US controlling the CIA, media, corporations and education. Hollande, Merkel and the EU are in their camp. 

 Like most sensible people, I am relieved Trump won and hope he rescues mainstream America. I hope resists Zionist pressure to invade Iran. 


First Comment from James Perloff-

The artificial conflict you speak of, between communist Jews and nationalist Jews, reminds me very much of the home conflict during the Vietnam War.

 In that one, the hippies and yippies (I then counted myself among them) took to the streets in protests that often turned violent. But, just as today's protestors are funded by Soros, the hippies back then were unwittingly being funded by the Rockefellers (as just one example, I used to hawk Boston's most left-wing underground newspaper, THE REAL PAPER, and its publisher was David Rockefeller, Jr.). 

Likewise, the men in our government who got us into the Vietnam War (Rostow, Bundy, Acheson) were not anti-communists but CFR globalists in the mold of today's Neo-cons. They prolonged the war into a 14-year divisive mess, and turned us from a "Leave It to Beaver" culture into a Woodstock culture. I sense they may now be taking a cue from that Vietnam War playbook, and are seeking to create another national divide. These protestors committing violence over Trump's Tweets--why weren't they out protesting Bush and Obama for ruthlessly bombing Iraq, Libya and Syria? Phoney as a dollar bill with Soros's picture on it.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Trump & The Masonic Jewish Tag Team"

Carol said (January 18, 2017):

Another excellent article, Henry; it explains the staged Zionist vs. Communist struggle. I think Putin is just another crypto Jew.

Doug P said (January 18, 2017):

Its not hard to see the dialectic between Bolshevism and Zionism in the USA and in Canada. We have a choice to elect the Left, the Bolsheviks (proponents of egalitarianism, multiculturalism and collectivism) and Right , the Zionists who continually take us to war with Israel's enemies and who are often known Israel firsters who populate their advisory committees with Israel firsters. They appear to be at odds with one another but are both Jewish (Talmudic) in foundational belief.

In the end its the money changers that effect change and Zionism and Bolshevism are ideal tools to create divisions among populations. I think Jews are the agents and the powers behind change to world government but I find it hard to believe that a Talmudic nutcase sits at the very top.

Also, humanity faces the threat of technology itself. When robots come into mass production their effect will be quick and be much larger than the effect of the PC. Robots could do many jobs that take years to train humans in addition to the tasks that require little thought. I could imagine robot dentists and surgeons doing jobs that are perfect.

Its the money changers and their wars that drive technology forward at an unbelievable pace. Nothing is better for technological development than war. I think that not being a monetary reformer first and foremost is to miss the target. I explain and prove that the national debt is not real here: (about 10 min.)

. I also clear up popular misunderstandings about money.

Tony B said (January 18, 2017):

Two comments on the latest divide and conquer article::

1. Hitler also threw plenty of Catholic priests into his camps.

2. Interesting how Trotsky and his followers were globalists while Stalin said the communists should solidify their control of the Soviet Union before attempting to conquer the world.

But now you make a good argument that the Trotskyites, America's neo cons, have actually switched sides from the great social levelers of communism and are the real pushers of the super-nationalist conceit that the U.S. is the "exceptional" (God's special) nation in the world. Interesting how easily these people can totally reverse their political roles and ideology while retaining their talmudic "holier than thou" status no matter which side they represent at the moment. To me it is obvious that all are just play acting roles and the real ideology of them all is that of Satan whose present earthly capital is the City of London with its Rothschild cabal.

AZ said (January 17, 2017):

Compliment for your latest article ‘Trump & The Masonic Jewish Tag Team’. Here is my reaction.

“Creating opposites concerning thesis and antithesis always worked in politics and in manipulating the minds and souls of the masses through the media. Your article is a good explanation of this principle. All the various kinds of ism’s are a mere distraction of the real inner values concerning the real evolution of consciousness and mankind. There is actually one kind of ism that I miss in your analyses and that is Jesuitism. What could the role of the Jesuits and their connection with both Trump, Clinton and Israel be? Both are descendents of the same satanic royal European blood lineage.

See the following video by Walter Veith:

So my question is, to which extend the Jesuits will play a role in bringing about the synthesis between the thesis and antithesis you mentioned. The Rothschilds as usually control them all, including the seat of the Antichrist, that soon will be or is maybe already erected in Jerusalem.”

Larry C said (January 17, 2017):

Henry, we can all take comfort in knowing that Trump is the quintessential American in that:

"His speech suggests a man with scattered thoughts, a short span of attention, and a lack of intellectual discipline and analytical skills...For listeners who identify with Trump, there is little they need to do but claim what they’re entitled to. No need for sacrifice, for compromise, for complexity. He taps into fear and insecurity, but then enables his audience to express that fear through anger. And anger gives the illusion of empowerment...He's an undisciplined narcissist who craves power but doesn't have the intellectual capacity to exercise it wisely." Tara Golshan, Donald Trump's unique speaking style, explained by linguists, January 11, 2017


December 25, 2016


Some of what Alex Jones says in the latest Israel video is appalling and disgusting - repeating the zionist propaganda about Palestinians using suicide bomber kids etc; excusing the slaughter of civilians in Gaza etc by Israel as acts of "war"; or equating those deaths to (Israel & western-funded) jihadist death squads is beyond the pale.....not to mention failing to point out that jewish cabalists are the main promoters of weaponized immigration and jewish neo-cons (and shabbas goy) are behind the de-stabilization of the middle east that creates chaos etc (Yion Plan/Eretz Israel)

Claiming that jihadists and saudis have more influence on hollywood than jewish cabalists or that jihadists and islamists have more influence than zionists is pathetic.

JONES has to perform so many mental acrobatics to justify his support for zionist israel it's painful to watch.

Jones IS now confirmed as fake news. Jones is a psy-op - if most people fail to see this after this latest awful monologue, then the future is very bleak as infowars influences a huge amount of people especially in the so-called truth community.

Just a few thoughts - have a blesses day (as pockets of the future says!)

PS - Alex finishes his Zionist shilling by claiming that leftists and islamists hate Christmas as it symbolises Jesus Christ's "birthday" but of course he fails to mention that most leftist thinking is from the cabalist jewish cultural marxism and communist schools and that in the Talmud, the greatest hatred toward Jesus Christ anywhere is to be found (as Michael Hoffman and E Michael Jones etc all point out!).

Also - in Lebanon and Syria conflicts - Hezbollah and other Shi'ite forces have protected Christians as they view Jesus Christ as a prophet (as do all true Muslims - not wahaabists or crypto-jew salafists etc).


Alex Jones states: "I support the jewish state of israel - it is the UN that is persecuting israel"

Alex Jones supports Zionist israel

ergo - Infowars/Alex Jones/Paul Joseph Watson/PRIZION PLANET are almost certainly stratfor/mossad cognitive infiltration operation or at the very minimu are zionist shills


Paul Joseph Watson on Jews

Alex Jones Good for Jews uh-oh

Reply from Chad:

As a regular listener of Alex Jones, I'm beginning to think that even he is getting tired of his own act.  He desperately needs a replacement he can trust.  The focus of Infowars now is to maintain funds to keep his overmanned ship afloat while he tries to cram more crew in.  Sure, he needs the staff to cover several events at once and the requisite funds.  This leads him to pimp out product after product.  It's understandable.  There's no free lunch and people don't work for free.
Regarding the comments on Israel, I think Mr. Jones is just getting lazy.  It's a lot easier to parrot the official narrative than to challenge it.  These days, he's even quick to echo the government/MSM version of many of the latest terror attacks.  With such an approach, he'd never be able to produce an "Terrorstorm 2.0."
Israel?  Alex Jones is quite aware of the history.  But maybe since he's gone ALL IN for Drumpf, he's chosen to hop along and drink the Kool-Aid.  I don't buy this nonsense about him being some kind of CIA or Zionist agent.  He's not a Jew.  Alex Jones is just getting long in the tooth and needs to bow out of the alternative media for a while.  He's getting tired and delirious.  Maybe a case of over working himself.  It's no different than a music band that is exhausted from playing their own music year after year.
The unfortunate thing is, there's nothing quite like Alex Jones to replace him and even he knows it.  Therefore, he has to keep burning the candle at both ends.  The more the candle burns, the more rope he puts around his neck with ill-thought out statements.  The very statements people misconstrue.
My advice is to focus on the big picture and not get tied up in the latest Tweet or self-made video.  Learn to understand how that man communicates and you'll see where he's coming from.  You'll also need to have been listening for a good ten years or more to really have a clue.  Tuning in for the first time in the past few months is not going to help you.
No, I'm not an Alex Jones apologist.  I'm getting worn out from his antics as well.  However, if I see a criticism that's kind of off, I'd like to give my opinion and point a few things out.

US Government Collaboration in Crime and Terror

December 21, 2016

HolderMrHonesty.jpegUS Government Collaboration in Crime and Terror    (from Dan)

A few years ago the ATF was used to run guns to Mexican crime cartels that run drugs to our cities and also run the human trafficking in the Border states, under a phoney sting operation called "Fast and Furious". Documents confirm Eric Holder's role in Fast and Furious cover-up

This was premeditated top down misuse of government agencies to provide guns for gangs , but the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform covered up the coverup by playing like it was lawful operation gone wrong. 

The peak of public awareness that US government was supplying all the "rebels" in Syria was fall of 2014.  Somehow they haven't put two and two together:  that the Obama administration has been doing the same thing on our Southern border, and "Sanctuary Cities".   Sanctuaries for terrorists from the Middle East and Africa, and Mexican gangs.   In short, the domestic operations are the same as "regime change" and "Arab Spring" abroad. 

The question is;  will the new Attorney General and director of DHS, and the 
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform expose their predecessors and dare call it treason? 

DECEMBER 15, 2016

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and State Department teamed up with an Islamic terrorist front group this month to train foreign officials how to protect Muslim civil rights and avoid discrimination and profiling when countering violent extremism. It marks the latest of many collaborations between the Obama administration and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists that was founded by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) and reportedly raises money for Hamas.

In 2008 CAIR, which claims to be America's largest Muslim civil liberties organization, was a co-conspirator in a federal terror-finance case involving the Hamas front group Holy Land Foundation. Read more in a Judicial Watch special report that focuses on Muslim charities. Despite the group's radical ties, it wields tremendous power in the Obama administration. This is especially true when it comes to the way the nation's local and federal law enforcement agencies conduct anti-terrorism training. In fact, it was CAIR that got the FBI to purge anti-terrorism material determined to be offensive to Muslims. Judicial Watch uncovered that scandal a few years ago and obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the arrangement. Judicial Watch also published a special in-depth report on the subject. CAIR also got several police departments in Obama's home state of Illinois to cancel essential counterterrorism courses over accusations that the instructor was anti-Muslim. The course was called "Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy" and departments in Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park caved into CAIR's demands....

Even if MI-6 Created Them, Beatles Deserve Respect by Gino K

December 18, 2016

Even if MI-6 Created Them, Beatles Deserve Respect

by Geno K

Although I agree that England, Tavistock, mind control, MI6, pop music as a weapon to split generations is all very true... what angers me is when people make comments about actors, like Staycer and Adorno... I find it very hard to believe people making these comments understand how to write and record music, or even theatrical impersonations...

As a musician, actor, impressionist, vocalist, voiceover artist, film and music producer and a Beatles fanatic who read every single book written about the Beatles, watched their films and know the dialogue by heart, can impersonate all 4 distinctly, grew up from 1960 forward and watched them on the Ed Sullivan show... not to mention have been very much involved in the conspiracy truther movement since the 1990s...

I know that one only has to watch the Beatles writing and arranging and rehearsing music in the studio with the insane amount of footage available to know that they played their own instruments...they sang their own vocals and harmonies... they wrote their own songs...

I have read the Apple recording notes cover to cover... Yes the producers added arrangements and studio musicians... they utilized voice enhancing as all popular music does, echo, reverb, phaser... they even physically used a razor blade to splice take 3 with take 24....but this imagined conspiracy that the Beatles weren't a genuine pop group who could make records and perform on stage is pure idiocy by people who don't know the difference between being a spectator and someone who lives inside the process. So many simply repeat what they read without having the finely tuned ear to know that hundreds of thousands of film and recordings completely debunk the conspiracy claptrap written well after the fact and having a purpose that apparently includes altering reality.

I too can stand in awe of new information like the film The Rotten Apple that tells me Paul McCartney actually spent a night partying at Beach Boy producer's house Terry Melcher with Charles Manson because i know the Laurel Canyon scene and all their biographies verify the whereabouts of McCartney and company.

Yes, we have actors playing parts of many famous icons for sociological purposes... and it continues today... but when EMI and British Intelligence decided they too needed an Elvis.... they didn't pick just anyone... They found 3 guys... friends... Lennon, McCartney, Harrison who had great voices, striking looks, fantastic charisma and humor... which cannot be faked... if it could... then there would be thousands of Beatles... and a tight music trio, and budding ability to compose music... The Beatles and their talent is REAL... and brilliant talents such as George Martin and his engineers knew how to groom it to a sweet contagious sound... This deserves the respect of being organic and appreciated as such.

Now did they replace McCartney after an accident? Did they replace the charming Lennon with a different Lennon? I remain on the fence due to such things as Lennon's clowning in 63, 64, 65 and the sudden appearance of a dour Lennon... and the footage of two McCartneys that seemingly shows something that just feels incongruous...

When people control media with trillions of dollars fakery is achieved by the best in the business... But certain things cannot be faked... the original Beatles with spontaneous answers to the press... charm, humor, talent... mannerisms... requires people who come to know a subject the way a mother knows her child... Not people who repeat the most unproven and weak ideas set forth after the fact. It is annoying.