Direct Link to Latest News


Is Ahmadinejad "Controlled Opposition" ?

September 26, 2010


by Anthony Migchels

in Arnhem, Holland

(for Henrymakow.,com)

Of course, it is always pleasant to hear a prominent politician speak some truth about 9/11 and even more so when these words are spoken near the crime scene. It provides a little justice to the 3000 victims of the Mossad/CIA/Globalist mass murder. At least someone seems to speak for them.

It is also fitting that Ahmadinejad would mention the fact that these 3000 dead have been used as an excuse to murder hundreds of thousands, and probably millions more.

That it is ridiculous to keep wailing about a few thousand Americans, when they kill a few hundred times more Arabs and other Muslims as revenge.

The dead are not to blame. It is their legacy that is besmirched by 'Enduring Freedom',  'Shock and Awe' and all the other wonderful word constructs devised for wholesale slaughter.

However, the real story about the Ahmadinejad speech is the fact that it is a textbook example of the Hegelian Dialectic. He shows himself a cynical whore on equal footing with his supposed Zionist adversaries.

He is a typical example of controlled opposition: two sides struggling towards the desired synthesis.

Because the real core of his speech is this:

"For years, the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations. The cause of the United Nation's ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.

In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes. The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute?

Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?

Dear Friends,

The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations [are] able to participate in the global governance actively and constructively.

The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination.

The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and [the] administration of justice. It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization's structure. The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process."

So everything is clear. No, the struggle is not against globalist controllers and their coveted World Government. The struggle is how the power will be divided between the remnants of the Nation States. Ahmadinejad is not defending his country's sovereignty; he wants a bigger piece of the pie for Iran.

So the current Thesis vs. Antithesis = Synthesis in this particular instance reads: US/UK/Zionism vs. Iran = World Government.

There is no reason for us to have any illusions about Iran's leadership. They are solid allies of the World Government Agenda.


In 2008,  Ahmadinejad said "mankind's gravest need today is a global government."
Proposing that the rule of single law in the entire world is a bare necessity for the mankind, he said, "The existence of a thousand laws in the world, and then expecting that the global society would reach a status of equilibrium, justice, and tranquility is wishing for the impossible."
He added, "It is not possible to observe global justice under such conditions that each country is ruled based on a different set of laws."

The Iranian leadership are the typically cynical henchmen that will lead their own people to the slaughterhouse. The fact that they will take the Zionist Entity along with them is not quite enough to consider them our friends.

Let us not fall for the old adage that our enemy's enemies are our friends.

Ahmadinejad is a truth teller when it comes to 9-11, but when it comes to world government, he is a traitor and a liar.


  The entire speech can be found here.

Anthony Migchels is organizing a barter system in Holland. His "real currencies" blog can be found here.

Related- 9-11 Truth Sites Silent on Ahmadinejad Speech

Makow -- World Conflict is Manufactured: Coming Shakedown of Iran & US

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Is Ahmadinejad "Controlled Opposition" ?"

AK said (September 27, 2010):

Good article and summation. I had heard two years ago that Iran was controlled opposition and was part of the New World Order. I watched the speech before ever reading this article where he openly calls for a New World Order, in those words. We’ve heard almost all presidents call for it in the past 20 or so years, Russia called for it as did China and a host of other countries. Personally I think we are almost there and they are just getting people use to the term so that last can be implemented.

On the hand sign, notice just how many use it that run governments, are in film, high positions, and considered “successful”. It isn’t a sign by accident or with many meanings. I believe that you have pegged that right on the money. Atheists and even many Christians are deceived to believe that Satan or Lucifer doesn’t exist, and that is his main power these days and the biggest lie he has ever told. Just because one doesn’t believe in him does not mean he doesn’t exist, but even if it were true, it all depends on those who rule and what they believe and base their actions on. Sadly, they are wining as people remain “Willingly Ignorant”.

Tony said (September 27, 2010):

Regardless of what one thinks of Ahmadinejad he just can't buy a fair shake. I suppose it's not right for HIM to create enough money out of nothing for the transaction. Moreover, being Muslim, he wouldn't. It is elitist thinking to state that when a man asks for fairness in government he really wants a "bigger piece of the pie" for himself. That's easy to say when you've got the big piece, as the west does. How selfish. "We can rule you but don't you ask for fairness for all, because we don't trust you" (but you have to trust us, like it or not). That's bull shit. It's not hard, for anyone who thinks, to see why those countries not ruling the UN still see the UN, if ever made fair, their only salvation.

They want to find a way not to be constantly stepped on by the big feet of the big nations. Frankly, I'd prefer to see it back to where sanity once had it but with some genuine care for the other guy thrown in. Let each nation be truly sovereign, let it make treaties independently with whatever other nations its government chooses and let all nations stick to their word in those treaties. Enforcement? Consult God. He is the ultimate dictator but He gives plenty of leeway. He just tells you upfront that if you don't obey you will eventually pay.

The UN is NEVER going to be anything except the ultimate governmental capitalistic seat of power prize which every greedy bastard in the world is going to try to make his own. It will always be a seat of terrible conflict and corruption. As in economic capitalism, in the end, the very worst of the worst will be the only one left standing and that is the devil. Ayn Rand and her style of "greed is good" bull shit notwithstanding.

Graham said (September 27, 2010):

Interesting about the United Nation speech given by Ahmadinejad of Iran-America number one enemy on their soil.

Tell me,If the United Nation was built before World War Two,would America allow Adolf Hitler to come to America, to give his famous Mein Kampf speech in the United Nation building and go back to Nazi Germany unharmed like Ahmadinejad,to start World War Two against America,like Ahmadinejad to Iran to start World War Three?

Very interesting !


Hitler was Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1939
Controlled opposition.


Andrew said (September 27, 2010):

I also believe that Ahmadinejad is controlled opposition. The foundational reason for me believing that is the double satanic hand sign that Ahmadinejad has been photographed making, which photo you included in this article for all to see. It seems to me that part of the plan is to first paint Ahmadinejad as somebody who is not credible by misquoting him as saying he wants to wipe Israel off the map and then have him come out and say that 9/11 was an inside job so that people will then say to themselves, "Ahmadinejad thinks 9/11 was an inside job so that can't be true. Everybody knows the crazy things that he comes up with. All these 9/11 conspiracy theories are nonsense." They are trying to give people a readily-available reason to comfortably dismiss 9/11 truth without even examining it. In this case, the readily-available reason is Ahmadinejad's perceived lack of credibility.

The rabbit hole is really, really deep. Boy, oh boy. But we're getting to the bottom of it thanks to you and your writers like Anthony Migchels!

Thanks a lot for this article from Anthony. It's great. He's cut through the noise to the centre of the bullseye.

Mark said (September 27, 2010):

Yes, when it comes to Iran, it's all controlled opposition. Arnhem has the right idea here. Ahmadinejad's public statements are always just right there at the moment the NWO needs to sway public perception. I've sensed that for a long time, the timing is not hard to reconcile...

Ahmadinejad suggested to the UN that it conducts a 9/11 investigation... That would be a move the NWO needs to discredit the US government in the eyes of it's citizens, thereby making a NWO/UN take over of the USA more palatable to US citizens. See, Ahmadinejad's statements are always in line with the more oblique and underlying NWO goals... The layers of misdirection are so thick the American people will never see through the fog.

Let's get real. If the USA/Israel wanted to invade Iran, they would have supported Saddam Hussein and provided him the tools necessary to start another war with Iran. Some kind of deal was cut with the powers in Iran long ago with Bush Sr., a known double dealin' back stabbing Skull and Bones tyrant. Hence, Saddam Hussein was taken out and all the evidence of the Bush administrations collusion with Hussein was destroyed. The same happened to Noriega, in Panama; another Bush CIA connection erased. Prehaps, Hussein wasn't a member of the NWO club as well.

Sadly, even the most blatant of deceptions now are being treated as breaking news never to questioned by the Zionist media, while our fellow citizens are forever kept in a reactionary state of mind. We need to change that to a pro-active state of mind and send all the embedded NWO/Zionist agents packin' from the bottom to the top of the food chain here in the USA.

Steve said (September 26, 2010):

He may be part of the thesis-anti-thesis, but initially he appears to be wanting to simply expose truth and upon reading his whole speech, he is not stating his own opinion but what he thinks are the main three opinions going around the world re 911. Further he suggests that there should have been a much deeper investigation into the real the causes and conspirators of 911 before embarking on war and the killing of hundreds of thousands.

Ahmadinejad may simply be backing a United Nations world order because he see's that is Iran's only chance of survival against a UK/USA/Israel drooling for war with Iran. With such nations as Russia and China backing them in the UN, Iran may postpone or halt the Anglo/Israeli war designs.

Further, I am careful not to accept so called Satanic hand signs as indications of being part of the elite world club, simply because the camera does lie and the hand sign is used by people today for other reasons.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at