Denver's Westword Magazine has recently reported on a bizarre twist in the Aurora theatre shooting case: to wit, one witness has made the incredible allegation that she was shot not by defendant James Egan Holmes, but by Aurora police chief Dan Oates.
According to this stunning allegation, made in an August 27 "Motion to Intervene", the claimant was visited at home by police chief Dan Oates (a recent import from the NYPD) and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers.
She alleges that Oates and Chambers blackmailed her into falsely testifying as a victim of the shootings - threatening, if she refused, to prosecute her on charges of prostitution and charity fraud. The police chief then shot her in "places that were not life threatening" so that she would appear to have been shot by Holmes himself.
The motion also claims that other so-called victims are actors working for the conspirators, calls for everyone involved to take polygraph tests, and demands a congressional investigation.
These are bombshell allegations. One would think that those accused, if they were innocent, would want exoneration. So how did the Arapahoe County Court respond?
Judge William Sylvester remarked that "the Court has information that the named victim ... did not file this pleading, and it appears that someone may be filing pleadings with false names."
Based on these vague references to undisclosed "information" and the "appearance" of foul play, the judge declared the motion illegitimate, struck it down, and released it, redacting the filer's name.
But he didn't stop there. He also ordered that the county's Adult Protection Services consider the redacted party for mental health evaluation - an action that brings to mind the recent warrantless detention of Brandon Raub.
Instead of fully disclosing the motion and investigating the claims, Judge Sylvester redacted the former and pronounced the latter to be insane.
Do you smell a rat? If so, the following information might be of interest to you.
WAG THE DOG
Investigative reporter Jim Stone, whose Fukushima Report (May 2011) implicated Israel in that disaster, has presented compelling evidence for his conclusion that the Aurora shooting simply never happened at all.
If Stone is correct that Aurora was a staged "Wag the Dog" event, then it lends credence to the claimant's allegations.
Here I will go over the most damning holes he has blown in the official story. Those wanting a more complete picture can review all the material at Stone's website, linked here.
First, in our CCTV- and smart-phone-ridden era, how is it possible that we have no visuals of the shooting? Not one single tape from inside the theater has surfaced - let alone a phone-cam video on YouTube. We have yet to see so much as a photo from inside, or any CCTV footage from the mall itself.
Second, look at the blood splatters reported to have come from the body of an injured child as she was carried out of the theater. Aside from the lack of bloody footprints, why do the splatters point toward the theater door, rather than away from it?
Third, "victim" Jessica Redfield (a.k.a Jessica Ghawi) was a TV intern who claimed to have witnessed a mass shooting at a shopping mall in Toronto in June 2012. Stone found that on her Twitter feed, she claimed on June 2 to have been present at a mass shooting only weeks earlier. She replied "Buhahahahaha" to a joke about shooting.What can account for her jocular tone?
In other tweets, Redfield/Ghawi announced that she was set to move into a lavish new living situation replete with swimming pools and ponds - digs well beyond the means of a mere intern.
After Aurora, her name hit the Social Security Death Index a bit too soon: immediately. Stone figures that her taking a big payout for her participation in a staged event would explain these anomalies.
Additionally - and Stone provides the math to back this up - the odds of one person witnessing two mass shootings in their lifetime, let alone one summer, are about 1 in 23 billion: vanishingly small.
Fourth, since pictures can be so much more expressive than figures and words, consider the following photograph from Aurora, with Stone's comments.
Fifth, consider the alleged perpetrator, Holmes. How is it possible that a timid graduate student, who had never handled a gun, suddenly found the wherewithal to avail himself of military-grade firearms and body armor, to trick out his apartment with sophisticated booby traps, and to shoot that many people in a dark environment where they would surely be diving for cover under the seats?
Simple. It isn't possible. James Holmes is a patsy, visibly confused as to why he ended up in his predicament. His demeanor is of one who has been extensively drugged, which would account for his amnesia. It would also explain why he was found slumped over a steering wheel and detained without incident.
THE SMOKING GUN
Now for the hard evidence that the Aurora shooting was nothing but a mock-up. Fortunately, it comes to us right out of the rats' mouths: the police dispatch tapes.
You read that correctly. Audio links at Stone's site, sourced from Wellaware1.com, clearly reveal that the Aurora police were not rushing to a real crime scene that night.
Rather, they were coordinating a drill.
At minute 11 of the first recording, the police units check in with each other and verify that all participants are ready. At minute 14, they discuss the positions they will be taking up at the mall. Five further audio links contain the dialogue of the drill itself.
In the seventh and final recording, the cops blandly discuss locations for photo ops with the "families" of the "victims". In a real emergency, of course, the families would never have allowed their loved ones to wait bleeding in the ambulances while they posed for the shutter.
These recordings alone are enough to prove that no shots were fired in the theater that night. The testimony of whoever filed the Motion to Intervene indicates that the real victims - the ones who ended up at the hospital that night - were undesirables rounded up and blackmailed into falsely testifying, or murdered outright. It might also explain the very sinister circumstances surrounding the sudden death of a nurse who was in the emergency room that night, and who could very well have been told, by dying patients, the real reasons they were there.
Photos from the "crime scene" show that the coordinators of this false flag event should have been more selective when screening actors to cry crocodile tears for the cameras of a complicit media establishment.
From the actions of Judge Sylvester in quashing the Motion and redacting the claimant's name, we can deduce that the court system in Arapahoe County is as corrupt as the Aurora police.
I expect that many will wonder: if no shooting took place, then who was in the theater? Wouldn't they be telling everyone that the shooting never happened?
Well, in the official account, theater attendance was down that night, just as the planes on 911 were two-thirds empty. A low number of participants, all in on the game, makes the secret easier to conceal.
In many precedent false flag events, including 9/11, drills coincided with real events so as to muddle the waters. In this case, the drill was the stand-in for an event that never happened at all.
The Stunned, The Drugged & The Surprised Patsy
In Response to, "Jim Stone: Batman Movie Massacre Was Staged"
The Batman Movie PSYOP is characteristic of at least two other historically pivotal events, that of the assassination of JFK on November 22, 1963, & also more recently, the November 4th, 1995, assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Like Holmes, neither the accused & convicted assassin Yigal Amir nor Harvey Oswald were aware they had actually shot or murdered anyone.
Individuals present at the peace rally in Tel Aviv during the preceding moments to Rabin's actual assassination heard & recorded Amir exclaiming several times he had only fired blanks. Canadian born Israeli author Barry Chamish presents evidence in his book "Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/who_killed_yitzak_rabin.htm," that Rabin was shot in his car on the way to the hospital, & not by Amir, as the official story to this day relates. All three -- Holmes, Amir AND Harvey Oswald were indeed, confused as to the situation in which they found themselves -- Oswald actually protesting his innocence live on camera & fully convinced of certain exoneration.
In the case of the Reichstag fire, a Dutch Communist by the name of Van der Lubbe was left wandering outside the Reichstag, arrested & charged with the offense. In any case, whereas the Reichstag fire led to a suspension of civil liberties & a consolidation of Nazi power, the Gleiwitz Incident served as a pretext for a full scale invasion of Poland, & as evidence to the world Germany was the aggrieved party.
In a repeat performance of the Reichstag Mechanism, events on 9/11 seem to follow a well trodden & dog-eared formula. On page 437 of his 1300+ page historical treatise, Bill Clinton's Georgetown mentor and author of "Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World In Our Time," writes it was a homosexual arson squad drawn from SA leadership that torched the Reichstag in 1933.
Many of these false flag & patsy events leave open wounds - wounds like JFK & even 9/11 that haven't healed to this day. Even the Reichstag Fire in 1933 still resonates in history, & upon human consciousness with a darkness. It would seem then, if history does repeat itself, America is today post Reichstag Fire with 1939 still to come. But then, America isn't Germany.