Direct Link to Latest News

 

All Laws Exist in A Fiction

January 23, 2010



earthhandsplash-pyradid.jpg(Editor's Note: I don't pretend to understand this information but many people I respect have been saying similar things. I welcome additional explanations from informed readers.)


by Rob Hay
Tax Resistor

(for Henrymakow.com)


What if I told you, you did not live in a country, nor do you have a true name, a true birth date and you did not have to file taxes or follow any laws?  As many of you scoff, stop for a moment and examine these facts.

If you look at the definitions of your Country/State/Province/City etc. you will find in the Constitution or the Interpretations Act that they are not  legally defined as being on the earth.  Canada, for example,is defined as the land under the water according to the Interpretations Act section 35(1), "Canada", for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;

Nowhere in any act will you find any mention of the earth.  To further this, Canada is a Corporation registered on the Security Exchange Commission in Washington D.C.  Here is the link:

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000230098&owner=i

nclude&count=40#Canada

Simply put, we live on a planet we call earth and not in Countries.  In fact Countries are not land under the real system of law, they are imaginary Seas, upon which Admiralty Law  applies and the NAMES you use are imaginary ships floating on the Sea, where Piracy reigns as the system of Commerce, between your and all the other imaginary ships.

But because you are not imaginary, they have to give you a play piece in the game. This is called a PERSON and its attributes are a NAME and BIRTH DATE.  The Game is rigged from the start. The pirates simply set up laws and wait for you to break one so that they can plunder your wealth and freedom. 

A name is an imaginary thing you are given, typically when you were born.  However, a name is simply hearsay; you do not know what your true name is, no one does.  The other attribute of a person, a Birth Date, is hearsay because no one can say when exactly the Universe was created and making use of an event such as Jesus' Death, hence A.D., is only hearsay.  Further Jesus was Crucified and died in the spring during Passover so the Calendar should actually start its new year in the spring.

What they have done is to overlay an imaginary world over the earth and make you believe that it is real, when in fact it is simply fiction.  So if you do not exist in their imaginary world, how is it that you must follow their laws and pay taxes?  You are not responsible for paying taxes and following their laws and their laws even say so!  Again using Canada for example:

The BNA Act Section 2 dealt with the Succession of the Queen heirs ruling over Canada.  It was removed from the Act in 1897.  When Queen Victoria died in 1901, all executive power seized in Canada as per Section 9 states all executive power is vested in the Queen.  It is reported that two days after the Queen died the Bankers in The City of London, claimed salvage rights on the ship adrift at sea called Canada.

 The UK Parliament did nothing to stop them.  The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 32 states that the application of the Charter only applies to Government and Section 52 of the Constitutional Act 1982, states that all laws in Canada must be compared against the Charter or they have no force or effect.  Thus all laws in Canada only apply to the Government, I am paraphrasing this for brevity, look it up!  This is because the Bankers own Canada and the Queen has nothing to do with Canada as there was no succession of power put into the Constitution.

http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1982.html

This is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of Canada.  For the USA, the Constitution there starts off with, "We the People..."  Pick up any law dictionary and see if it defines people as human beings, persons or men and women created by God. It doesn't. It is so ambiguous it is ridiculous.

All laws only apply to PERSONS.  If you open the King James Bible and look in Genesis Chapter 1, you will see very clearly that God did not create us as persons.  None of the US State Constitutions define any State as being on the earth and neither does the USA Constitution describe the USA being on the earth.  It is all imaginary.

Now for those of you who still think that law applies to you , take a look at the address of the court house and the documents that come from the court house. 

You will notice that especially in Canada that they change the province name to a two letter abbreviation and in all cases they leave Canada off the address. 

Look up the Address for the Supreme Court of Canada; they left Canada out of the address.

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/contact/index-eng.asp

This is because the Courts are the Bankers Courts and not the People's courts.  The laws have no executive power behind them from the people.  Executive power means the ability to enforce and make law.  So yes, since Queen Victoria died, all laws made since in Canada have no executive power or state authority behind them.

So you want out?  Well read my book, The Extortion System of the Ruling Elite

There is a solution.

---

Robert Hay (<[email protected]>) graduated in Telecommunication Engineering Technology from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology in Edmonton. From there, he dedicated 5 years of his life to learning the spiritual healing arts and discovered a completely different take on life. 

He became quite concerned over massive injustices and began to fight back over paying taxes. He discovered that all laws reside within a fiction. After spending a few years gathering information and successfully preventing the Tax Man from taking him to court over unpaid taxes, he wrote a book called, The Extortion System of the Ruling Elite. It is a free download off his website.

 



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "All Laws Exist in A Fiction"

Peter said (January 25, 2010):

Rob is correct and I have read nearly everything on his web site. As I have mentioned I have been through the divorce courts and it was the crimes of magistrates and judges that helped me 'wake up'. I have completed my proper straw man recapture and claim of right to separate my corporate straw man fiction from my human being self.

After about 600 hours of work, many affidavits etc, I challenged the jurisdiction of the Australian Federal Magistrates Court on 26th November 2009. The magistrate presenting himself was named David Dunkley. I video taped the entire hearing. I asked David on about 5-6 occasions for his agreement to enter the court with my inalienable rights in tact. He refused to agree to this meaning that if I entered the court I would 'waive' all my rights, including the right to life.

I also asked David if he was sitting under oath, he refused twice to answer that question. I read into the record that I contended that he was merely acting as a private employee of a private company since the 'Commonwealth of Australia' is actually a company registered in the US Securities and Exchange Commission and is therefore operating under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

Further, I told David that if he wished me to remain in the room defending my position that I would bill him 1 million troy onces of gold for my time and I asked him if he agreed to my bill. He said yes and I thanked him for agreeing to my fees.

I later sent him the lawful bill for 1 million ounces of gold. He hasn't paid yet. I have charged two Australian Federal Magistrates with the common law crime of theft and I have noticed the PM/AG they too may be charged with crimes. I am currently trying to raise a jury to try the two magistrates in Sydney.

So yes. All Rob says is true. I have the videotape of a magistrate sitting on the bench in Australia refusing to answer my questions as a sovereign to establish the court as a common law court. The court remained a UCC based court which means all that happened was some actors of the same club 'the Australian Law Society' put on a pantomime.

By the way, by proving this is possible this is the sword we can put to feminism. We can lawfully refuse the jurisdiction of the Illuminati corrupted governments and their feminist legislation and courts and simply go about our lives without being subject the legislation of any country. This is what I have done. Once you understand how straw man recapture works and how to operate the corporation known as your person with your name as primary creditor and secured party it all works just fine. I also plan to try and incarcerate all judges/magistrates in Australia and Ireland who have committed common law crimes. Starting with David Dunkley. Should be fun!


William Dean said (January 25, 2010):

The attached book by Mr. Hay had some interesting information, however, I do not buy his assessment of Christianity. That could not be kept a secret very long. Many so-called hoaxes about the faith have turned out to be false or untested. Others have done the same type of investigation and come to the conclusion that the story of Jesus is true, and none of his disciples recanted his story over an entire lifetime. I agree with Hay's thinking on corporations and Capitalism, although it's not truly the same now, as we have monopoly Capitalism or Fascism really ruling the world. Knowing Christianity is true doesn't make it easy to live as we are sorely tempted in many areas, and those who oppose it have many means of making life miserable for those who question them. In the US, many have come to believe that being a Christian means a life of ease, with family and friends around the comfortable hearth, while they grow old watching their kids and grand-kids make their way to a better life for each succeeding generation. That has not always been the case as history shows, and past generations endured numerous hardships, disease, wars, prejudice, etc. in making a life, which often didn't last into old age. Most don't die for their faith in this country now, but the vast majority do not understand the NWO as evidenced by the last election. Attempts to thwart it will be futile, since there are many thousands in it. And how many know just who those people are?


JCW said (January 24, 2010):

I have heard all this stuff before. Taxes are illegal, we are all a corporation and all laws are based on admiralty law and so on. This all may be true. The problem is that when you fight them in court you are simply acquiescing to their authority, even if you win you lose, because you have unconsciously submitted yourself to their authority. It's like the street fighter and the boxer, they are both great in their own element, but force the street fighter to fight by the Marquess of Queensbery rules and now who has the advantage. There is a truth that is being "Birthed" in the land and throughout the world that will destroy the evil that has darkened the land. I know my own values have changed since I have started reading about our monetary system, the lies we have been told are truths in life and in history. It is a process of unlearning everything we thought was true. I was so consumed with paying my bills and meticulously obeying all the laws of the land. I am in my mid fifties and can remember a day when there were no credit cards, yet through the process of time I unconsciously began to worship my credit rating as a deity. All that has changed. The money we spend is not real, the laws are becoming so onerous that in the not to distant future the only way to obey the spirit of the law will be to commit suicide (I'm exaggerating).

It's strange but I no longer care. As more and more people quit caring the bankers house of cards will collapse.

Our greatest power is in our weakness. I have no control over how much I work. If I work less I make less and can afford less. My mortgage lender can threaten me all they want but if I can't pay I can't pay. I no longer care. They didn't pay the note of my house with real money anyway.

People are becoming aware and informed and it is because of sites like yours who have dared to contradict the prevailing powers.

Prison is only a threat if you if live in fear of going to jail.


John said (January 24, 2010):

I am glad to see you posting an article on this topic. There are many men and women in Canada who are waking up to the scam that has been perpetrated on all of us since birth. The entire subject of who we really are, and not just the part about paying taxes, is a long learning curve. I have been studying it for a year and a half now and I have tried some of the methods I’ve learned to refuse photo radar tickets and other forms of “theft” from my “person”.

One of the main points that I learned was never to go to court. You are in their jurisdiction if you do, and the odds are stacked against you big time. A subpoena is literally nothing more than an
“invitation”. People who think defense lawyers actually work for the defendant are living in a dream world. These shysters take an
Oath to the State, not to YOU!

Your readers should start learning about this info at the following links:

Robert Arthur Menard (based in BC)
http://www.thinkfree.ca
Access to articles requires registration.

World Freeman Society (also based in BC)
http://worldfreemansociety.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=3909
This forum is loaded with info and real people who are living examples of this info. You can read the forum but to comment or view some of the posted articles requires registration.

Mary Elizabeth Croft (based in Alberta I think)
http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net
Read her articles on the website and download her free PDF book called: How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency
Known to Man.

Irene Gravenhorst (based in BC) Watch her videos on YouTube. Just search for her name.

For a USA perspective that is very similar to the Canadian system go to the following YouTube link and watch this video interview of Tim Turner. It’s an hour long but it will truly open your eyes!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?=JbE4E769838#t=37m40s


Dave said (January 24, 2010):

I recognize much of Jordan Maxwell's teachings in Rob Hays' assertions, but I do appreciate the fact that Mr. Hays, unlike Maxwell, writes from a Bible-based perspective. That said, I would just like to add that when a U.S. citizen puts that first penny into the Social Security system under the Social Security number they've been given, this constitutes their legal agreement to give the U.S. Corporation a large portion of their wages now and in the future to help that Corporation pay off its national debt with the promise of a small retirement benefit at the end. This legal agreement is nearly impossible to break, and as one gets older, that puny reward is often the only thing some have to look forward to. One solution would be to teach children at a very young age to ignore their Social Security number and simply refuse to pay into the system or ever file taxes. I'm not sure if the resistor would be employable or not, but it would be one way out.

Think of the nest egg you'd have at retirement age if you had put an equal per cent of your wages into a lifetime annuity instead of taxes!


D said (January 24, 2010):

With this article you may find you have opened up a big can of worms and you might possibly be flooded with emails depending on your readers and what they know about this subject. I and others I know have been researching into this since about 2001 and prior for some. It can really become a loaded subject as it's fundamental concepts are so far reaching. Myself and others I know personally have tested these concepts out in the real world (such as it is). There are some degrees of success, and some jail time, I do not know first hand of any absolute wins/successes at this point. However that does not necessarily reflect on the lack of credibility of some of the information. In fact just the opposite could be the case.

Which could explain the great lengths that Cops, Judges, Crown Prosecutors etc. will go to to discredit the facts/truth in order to protect this very profitable game/system that has been in place for many years. I will share with you some of the best information (in my opinion) we have on this wide ranging subject. There is a lot to learn and comprehend. There are some little ways that you can test out to verify for yourself that at least some of this is true. Examples coming. Should you continue long enough on this road you will find that this information ties in with all the things you've been saying as to what's going on in the world and why. Deception is the name of the game. Caution be careful what/who you choose to believe. The first question you might want to ask yourself is; do you consider yourself to be a man or a PERSON and why?

Lots of info here

http://www.detaxcanada.org/


Rob Hay (Author) said (January 24, 2010):

I just wanted to thank you for all the work you put in to help make this article appear on your site. I know you had a lot of difficulty in grasping what the subtle differences are that make us into slaves or free men and women. The simple one is we make use of fiction to describe ourselves, i.e. Tax Resistor. That may be the effect, but in truth according to the Bible, all we can say is that we are a man or a woman created by God. God did not give us names or titles because that would make us a thing.

We are more than a thing we are co-creators with God. The duality of this reality presents LORD God, Satan who's only goal is to trick us into forgetting who we are so we can be enslaved by him. He does this by getting us to accept fiction as being part of us, hence names and titles.

I know that anyone who has gone to court to fight the tax people have lost. The lose because they accepted fiction and authority of others over them. They may throw statements at you and silly letters ignoring your own, but if they fight with you until you prove to them you know who you are and that they are the slaves not you. You simply order them to zero the account and not to bother you ever again about it. That's what I did, but it took 4 years of my life doing this stuff and staying out of the court. They ask you permission for everything they do to you in the form of demands. That is the nature of slavery. They always address the person not the living man created by Gos on the earth.

Anyway take care and I hope over time you learn more about our duality nature.


Doug said (January 24, 2010):

Hi Henry. Earlier in my ongoing experience I read on these topics for about two years. In fact, I could explain exactly how the (income) tax laws are perverted in the US. But the simple fact is this: once the banksters decide to get you, the number of felonies they commit is irrelevant. It is not base on law at all, it is a straight up gun-in-your-face heist. You can represent yourself and be crushed. You can hire a lawyer to represent you and be crushed. OR you can preempt the whole process with a good lawyer. The trick is the KIND of lawyer. What works is a good estate planning attorney and a great accountant who work together. Tax "voluntary" compliance is a moving target. and these people specialize in doing just that. Of course they arrange affairs such that you pay the least tax, else how could you afford them?? Regards, Doug
--
PS

Hello Henry, regarding the corporate matrix: two primers: "Invisible contracts" and "Legal Fictions," Both are excellent.


Adam said (January 24, 2010):


John Harris YouTube "It's all an Illusion"

at Lawful Rebellion Conference

http://www.tpuc.org/node/558


Bill said (January 24, 2010):

The “rule of law” has fallen, bait and switched by “rule of biased, parochial man”, destroyer of civilizations.

Legality is not determined by opinions or words of “experts” claiming expertise in complex and fraudulent word games. Legality is keeping the peace, or making sure that none are predator or prey. Criminals are those who initiate harm. Period.

The legal “profession” have rationalized themselves into the position that “criminal is those who disagree with us”, part of the fake “obey or else” paradigm of our “masters” which is imploding.

The “rule of law” is a precisely defined law. It is the highest law of mankind, stated below:

“the suppression of forceful and fraudulent methods of goal seeking”

“all are treated equally by the law”. This means ALL, including king and judges

“absolute property rights”

This in turn is based on the fact that human behavior (the topic of law) is about goal seeking. In the seeking of any goal, there are only three possible methods: force, fraud and honest trade. Any transaction that is not an honest, mutually agreed trade will cause a self-defensive response (conflict) from the victim whose survival has been affected.

“The Rule of Law” is the glue that keeps all of mankind acting together in common interest, tied together by mutual dependence of trade, on an evolutionary path to excellence. Force and fraud creates conflict and destroys civilizations. Mankind is now on a devolutionary path to extinction because the co-operation once forced by “the rule of law” has been replaced by legitimizing force and fraud for those who incorrectly believe they wield power.

Rule of Law, Defined:
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/c1/34

Darwin PROVED: Survival EQUALS ability to adapt to environment EQUALS ability to choose correctly EQUALS freedom:
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/36

Mathematics of Rule (explains current economic stall):
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/c1/32

How to THINK and solve problems:
http://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/c1/33

Justice Defined: We are all free to profit or suffer and learn (adapt to excellence) by facing the consequences of our OWN choices. Injustice is to be forced to suffer the consequences of choices of unaccountable (irresponsible) others..

“The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern. The law of liberty tends to abolish the reign of race over race, of faith over faith, of class over class.” ~ Lord Acton


Alan said (January 24, 2010):

Apart from Jordan Maxwell, who has a whole lot of his web-site devoted to "Admiralty Law" (after all, why are convicts placed in the dock?), and he also has videos on Google video, there is a guy in the UK, called John Harris, who has gone into "Lawful Rebellion".

Here is a list of sources of info on this topic:

wwwjordanmaxwellcom

wwwyoutubecom/watch?v=aZqb0TW15EE (This is excellent)

wwwtpucorg

www.tpuc.org/Acts_and_Charters

wwwredicecreationscom/radio/2010/01jan/RIR-100114.php

bbc5tv/eyeplayer/articles/john-harris-its-illusion

Of course, you could just try entering "Admiralty Law" into Google.


William said (January 24, 2010):

after 12 years' activity in the Tax Honesty Movement in Canada, helping 22 self represented people through prosecutions for 'failing to file' to one degree or another, I disdain the stuff that Mr Hay spouts.

Even if his word majic is logically correct, it does not matter a whit ... you'd better get it clear that - of course the Banksters prefer the 'velvet glove approach' - but ultimately, they resort to 'the fist of steel' .... uniformed thugs with guns on their hips and those guns are loaded.

Saying that he 'successfully prevented the Tax Man from taking him to Court' just indicates what a child he is on this topic. The income tax racketeers work on a very different time-line than the herd : they have forever. Such jail-house lawyers are long on verbiage, but come up short when I start asking to see documentation to do with their so-called "wins"


Glenn said (January 24, 2010):

Anyone one who thinks that registering themselves as a " natural person " will give them the legal right to fore go paying taxes, is mistaken. Although both in theory and in practice, I agree whole heartedly with the information in this article. Just open up your wallet and pull out your drivers license. Your name appears in CAPITAL letters, signifying that you, the bearer of such license, is in fact a corporation. Thats right. We're all a bunch corporate entities.

http://www.cga-canada.org/en-ca/AboutCGACanada/CGAMagazine/2007/Sep-Oct/Pages/ca_2007_09-10_prof_taxforum.aspx

For more information on what being a natural person is all about, I recommend this site as a starting point for research

http://www.natural-person.ca/incometax.html


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at