Direct Link to Latest News


Sexually Abused Males, "Oprah Style"

November 19, 2010

oprah1.jpg You don't become one of the world's richest women without selling out. Her logo is a variation on the Illuminati dot in circle motif. Her show conditioned people to believe "men" in general, and not homosexuals in particular, are responsible for sodomizing boys.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Last week, Oprah presented 200 men who had been abused as children and youths.

They were called "survivors."

Not once were their abusers mentioned.

Not once were the words "homosexuality" and "homosexual" uttered.

It was like a meeting of holocaust survivors who couldn't mention Nazis.

Why is this? Because the promotion of homosexuality is part of the Illuminati agenda. So they couldn't very well show the connection between it and pederasty.

One in six males is sexually molested, Oprah intoned. But she carefully avoided the question, "By whom?"

"Who was abused by a woman?"
Oprah could have asked for a show of hands. But that would have been almost as bad. Women are also a "protected minority" in the New World Order. 

The implication is that male youths are the victims of that perennial evil, "Men" , not homosexuals.

Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population, they constitute about a third of child molesters. (Of course, the other two thirds are heterosexual pedophiles i.e. targeting girls.)


If this isn't wild enough, Oprah and her expert guest, Dr. Howard Fradkin, made a point of stating that this sexual abuse did not cause homosexuality.

They said, get this, a man's "sexual orientation" is determined by age four.
 "You just know you're different."  The abuse supposedly comes after that age. 

At the same time, 80% of the men in the studio said they HAD DIFFICULTY having intimacy with a woman! And many of the men sported earrings and were clearly gay.

Talk about cognitive dissonance.  

According to one study, "Abused [male] adolescents, particularly those victimized by males, were up to 7 times more likely to self-identify as gay or bisexual than peers who had not been abused."

Many studio participants testified how sodomy had "robbed them of their manhood, destroyed their spirit."  About one third of child sexual abuse victims are boys.

The unsavory truth is that homosexuality perpetuates and spreads by preying on straight youth. But rather than examine the source of the problem, Oprah turned her show into a gab fest where tearful men/gay victims got the "you go girl!" treatment. The implication is that there is nothing we can do about the cause.

A Google search shows that Oprah has focused on Nambla only twice in her 25 year show career. Nambla is an organization that promotes  pedophilia. 

The men on Oprah's show should ask: if she is a friend, why won't she mention their childhood enemy?


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Sexually Abused Males, "Oprah Style" "

Kevin said (November 21, 2010):

I was at home and my wife was watching this program..

Immediately I said "Well who is molesting boys? Obviously homosexuals"

I guess even pointing out the obvious is forbidden these days..If you are sexually attracted to a member of the same sex you are HOMOSEXUAL. But some how it seems homosexuals , by new definition, are only attracted to other men who are over 18. (Could not be further from the truth) Men who molest boys are "straight"

Brad said (November 20, 2010):

You are an evil man.

1 in 6? I would be suprised if it was 1 in 60. Yes those are Oprah's #'s but they suit your anti-gay agenda don't they?

And; (Of course, the other two thirds are heterosexual pedophiles i.e. targeting girls.)

Now tell me something; if 'Uncle Ernie' will probe a young girl is a young boy going to be out of bounds?

This is the sort of irresponsible propaganda that is the cause of gay bashing.

As a Jew you should be more careful. Jews had fangs (as we all know) in pre-war Germany: Right?

Leave us alone; WE ARE NOT MONSTERS.

I would sooner cut my own throat than harm a child.

And; indoctrinate? I don't think so; more like trying to hold-on to a shred of self-esteem after being bludgeoned by a psychopath like you.



Obviously every gay isn't a pedophile but every gay seems to want to protect them by writing letters like this.

Heterosexual pedophiles aren't interested in boys.

You can't seem to understand that it is heterosexuals NOT gays who are under attack.


W.G. said (November 20, 2010):

Another sad point is these men were also "victimized" by their "friend" Oprah, and they either don't know it, or don't care. I often wonder how far they have to search to find these "experts" who's credentials should be dubious at best.

To think that at no time any real questions as to "who" abused them is incredulous. You're analogy of Holocaust survivors not mentioning Nazi's was spot on. We all know why homosexuality was not mentioned. .it would offend the "gays" in her audience, and they are many to be sure.

As I said, it's a tragedy these men had been victimized early in their lives, yet they are once again victimized by their "friend", and her expert. Nothing like being made a fool of on national television, and willingly agreeing to it. Another sad commentary on life today!

David said (November 20, 2010):

Oprah is 100% NWO. She is taking leave from her prime role in her Empire soon. I suspect that she is going to be the first female President of the USA. She is a bona fide feminist. She is serving a purpose for the Zionist media and so is given wealth. She set up a school in Africa only for females. Lord knows what she will do for these girls. Will they become playthings of the Illuminati or will they help their countries? Oprah is a goddess in the eyes of the sleeping. I guess too much fluoride and aspartame will bend the consciousness in favor of this wretch!

Keith said (November 20, 2010):

Right on about Oprah. She is a pure Illuminati shill. I can't stand her at this point.

Go and see the October 2010 issue of her magazine. The photo spread regarding "Charisma". A veiled and not so veiled reference to Illuminati and their themes.

Quite interesting and shocking for those in the know.

Kay said (November 20, 2010):

The Oprah show slipped into the realm of new-age-absurd some years ago. I stopped watching the Oprah show around that time, and even then, I only watched it when they featured those freebies and giveaways.

When she started talking about all that inner-you and new age hocus-pocus, I was chased away. But I just don't understand this fascination and predatory goal of homosexualizing men! Except for population reduction and just pure perversion, all I can ask is: WHY? I mean, just today on CNN, they featured a report about a California politician named Lloyd Schofield who is pushing to actually BAN circumcision of newborn males and boys under 18. What! For some reason, what this Schofield person is doing seems to be moving right in the direction of NAMBLA. A move to ban circumcision:

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at