The Agony of a Righteous Jew: Oscar Levy
October 13, 2014
we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners...I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. . ."
Oscar Levy (1867-1946) was a British Jewish physician, Nietzsche scholar and son of a banker.
This is from his Preface to George Pitt-Rivers's The World Significance of the Russian Revolution,
a denunciation of the dominant Jewish role in Communism.
Makow Comment: More evidence that Judaism (Cabalism) is a satanic cult that aims at world domination by
destabilizing the world. Its leaders, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers, have duped many Jews and Freemasons
to become their instruments. (Cabalism maintains that God is "formless, unknowable and not in the universe." This is a prerequisite for Cabalists to replace God- i.e. Satanism.)
[Abridged by Henry Makow, originally posted April 7, 2011]
From OSCAR LEVY to Mr. George Pitt-Rivers, July 1920
Every writer, who, like yourself, is oppressed by the subject of the present and embarrassed by his anxiety for the future, MUST try to elucidate the Jewish Question and its bearing upon our Age.
For the question of the Jews and their influence on the world - past and present - cuts to the root of all things, and should be discussed by every honest thinker, however bristling with difficulties it is, however complex the subject as well as the individuals of this Race may be.....
KEY TO UNDERSTANDING HISTORY
But first of all, I have to say this: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the Jews. Take the Great War that appears to have come to an end, ask yourself what were its causes and its reasons: you will find them in nationalism.
You will at once answer that nationalism has nothing to do with the Jews, who as you have just proved to us, are the inventors of the international idea. But no less than Bolshevist Ecstasy and Financial Tyranny can National Bigotry (if I may call it so) be finally followed back to a Jewish source -- are not they the inventors of the Chosen People Myth? and is not this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation, however small and insignificant it may be?
And then think of the history of nationalism. It started in our time and as a reaction against Napoleon;
Napoleon was the antagonist of the French Revolution; the French Revolution was the consequence of the German Reformation; the German Reformation was based upon a crude Christianity; this kind of Christianity was invented, preached and propagated by the Jews: THEREFORE the Jews have made this war!
Please do not think this a joke: it only seems a joke, and behind it there lurks a gigantic truth, and it is this, that all latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a Jewish source, for the simple reason, that the Semitic idea has finally conquered and entirely subdued this only apparently irreligious universe of ours.
There is no doubt that the Jews regularly go one better or worse than the Gentile in whatever they do, there is no further doubt that their influence today justifies a very careful scrutiny, and cannot possibly be viewed without serious alarm.
The great question, however, is whether the Jews are conscious or unconscious malefactors. I myself am firmly convinced that they are unconscious ones, but please do not think that I wish to exonerate them on that account. . . A conscious evildoer has my respect, for he knows at least what is good: an unconscious one -- well, he needs the charity of Christ -- a charity which is not mine -- to be forgiven for not knowing what he is doing.
But there is in my firm conviction not the slightest doubt that these revolutionary Jews do not know what they are doing; that they are more unconscious sinners than voluntary evildoers.
I am glad to see that this is not an original observation of mine, but that you yourself have a very strong foreboding about the Jews being the victims of their own theories and principles.
On page 39 of your pamphlet you write: "It may be that the Jews have always been instrumental in bringing about the events that they most heartily disapprove of; that maybe is the curse of the Wandering Jew".
If I had not the honor, as well as the pleasure, of knowing you personally, if I were not strongly aware of your passionate desire for light and your intense loathing of unfairness, this sentence, and this sentence alone, which tells the truth, will absolve you in my eyes from the odious charge of being a vulgar anti-Semite.
No, you are not a vulgar, you are a very enlightened critic of our Race. For there is an anti-Semitism, I hope and trust, which does the Jews more justice than any blind philo-Semitism, than does that merely sentimental "Let-them-all-come Liberalism" which in itself is nothing but the Semitic Ideology over again. And thus you can be just to the Jews without being 'romantic about them.
You have noticed with alarm that the Jewish elements provide the driving forces for both Communism and capitalism, for the material as well as the spiritual ruin of this world.
But then you have at the same time, the profound suspicion that the reason of all this extraordinary behavior may be the intense Idealism of the Jew. In this you are perfectly right. The Jew, if caught by an idea never thinks any more in watertight compartments as do the Teuton and Anglo-Saxon peoples whose right cerebral hemisphere never seems to know what its left twin brother is doing; he, the Jew, like the Russian, at once begins to practice what he preaches, he draws the logical conclusion from his tenets, he invariably acts upon his accepted principles.
It is from this quality, no doubt, that springs his mysterious force -- that force which you no doubt condemn, but which you had to admire even in the Bolshevist. And we must admire it, whether we are Jews or whether we are Christians, for have not these modern Jews remained true to type? Is there no parallel for them in history? Do they not go to the bitter end even in our day?
Who stirred up the people during the late war in Germany? Who pretended to have again the truth, that truth about which Pontius Pilate once shrugged his shoulders? Who pleaded for honesty and cleanliness in Politics, that honesty which brings a smile to the lips of any experienced Pro-counsel of to-day? Writers who were mostly Jews: Fried, Fernau, Latzko, Richard Grelling -- the author of J'accuse', who was killed and allowed himself to be killed for these very ideas and principles. Men and women of the Jewish Race: Haase, Levine, Luxemburg, Landauer, Kurt Eisner, the Prime Minister of Bavaria.
From Moses to Marx, from Isaiah to Eisner, in practice and in theory, in idealism and in materialism, in philosophy and in politics, they are today what they have always been: passionately devoted to their aims and to their purposes, and ready, nay, eager, to shed their last drop of blood for the realization of their visions.
MANKIND SUFFERS FOR JEWISH FOLLY
"But these visions are all wrong", will you reply. "Look where they have led the world to. Think, that they have now had a fair trial of 3,000 years' standing. How much longer are you going to recommend them to us and to inflict them upon us? And how do you propose to get us out of the morass into which you have led the world so disastrously astray?"
To this question I have only one answer to give, and it is this: "You are right".
This reproach of yours, which -- I feel it for certain -- is at the bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred: If you are anti-Semite, I, the Semite am an anti-Semite too, and a much more fervent one than even you are. . .
We (Jews) have erred, my friend; we have most grievously erred. And if there was truth in our error 3,000, 2,000, nay, 100 years ago, there is now nothing but falseness and madness... a madness that will produce an even greater misery and an even wider anarchy.
I confess it to you, openly and sincerely, and with a sorrow whose depth and pain an ancient Psalmist, and only he, could moan into this burning universe of ours. . .
We who have posed as the saviours of the world; we who have even boasted of having given it "the" Saviour; we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.
We who have promised to lead you to a new Heaven, we have finally succeeded in leading you into a new Hell. . .
There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. . . And it is just our Morality, which has prohibited all real progress, and -- what is worse -- which even stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours. . .
I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. . .
Related: Oscar Levy's Obituary
Livingstone - Cabalist Creative Destruction behind Syrian "Civil" War
First Comment by Lynda:
As much as I would like to see Jews interrupt their regularly scheduled programming from the Kabal, its Golems and instrumentalities, I do not think this letter of Oscar Ludwig Levy to George Pitt-Rivers (July 1920) is an example of someone who follows the Law of Moses. With respect, I don't think it belongs in the 'Righteous' file. His comments and reflections are amoral in the strict Nietschean sense.
The only way, Oscar Levy could be considered 'righteous' is if that is translated into Greek and encrypted into the 'eu' sun code of the secret societies. Many Greek words carry the eu prefix that translate into good, well, fair, glory, righteous, godly. The Secret Societies - the Masonic Agentur or the Gentile social Masonry of the Kabal - often codes 'helios / sun' with the Greek prefixes io; eo; eu etc to signify some aspect of the sun. Such glyphs, sigils and codes come from the ancient Babylonian priesthood of Sumer which stretched the length of the EU-phrates River from Eridu (South) to Babylon (North). Euphrates means: EU - righteous (eg helios in the sense of righteousness) and Phrate (brotherhood). The brotherhood of the sun-righteousness was the ancient Babylonian priesthood. Their mystery schools (for example the Eleusian Mystery Schools of Greece were all over the empires that succeeded ancient Babylon from Lydia to Egypt) - these were just schools. Modern Freeamasonry is the successor to these schools.
But in the pages of the New Testament we have the discourses of a branch of the ancient priesthood, itself, the Pharisees, who worked their ancient law of the Tradition of the Elders (and cloaked it in the teaching of Moses) as well as their Babylonian magecraft: the Kaballah. In his Letter, Oscar Levy gets a score of 100% in both Law and Kaballah. He is a priest and an elite of the Kabal, a master of the rabbinic dialectic and like his Pharisaic antecedents in the Kabal, he voids the Law of Moses.
One of the defining marks of the Elders of Zion - descendants of this ancient Babylonian Kabal is that they always cloak their true religion which true POV they think none can discover. They cloak it in the teaching of Moses. But as the discourses of Jesus of Nazareth in the NT clearly bear witness, they void the Law of Moses by their Tradition of the Elders - later written down as the Talmud.
We have a few transcripts from men who were on the interface of the Kabal - men like Chaim Rakovsky who was a commander of the Bolshevik front raised up by the Kabal for the destruction of Czarist Russia and the creation of a globalist Golem that would be a major vector for the ordo ab chao. We have the writings of Theodore Herzl who was a commander of the Zionist front raised up by the Kabal for the taking of Palestine. All very instructive.
But with this letter of Oscar Ludwig Levy, I think we have a letter from one of the Elders. He is the real deal. He is straight out of the pages of the New Testament.
The Mosaic Law of Israel is not dialectical. The Mosaic Law sets out prohibition in terms that refer to the character of God Himself. The reasoning of the Mosaic Law is based on non-contradiction in terms. There is no thesis <--> antithesis ---> synthesis about it The 'love your neighbour as yourself' can have the limited interpretation in the sense of command to love fellow members of the Covenant - in this case, the Circumcision. But even taken and limited in this sense, the attitude of Dr Levy voids the Law of Moses. He is engaged in "lesser brethern" management strategy, not the second commandment of Moses. His assistance to the publication of facts of matter on the 'Jewish Question' will serve to create the backlash [ aka 'anti-semitism ] they want. The Protocols are very clear about this.
Dr Levy is merely assisting this process from the Chesed [compassion] side of the dialectic. He does not oppose Gevurah [severity]. He himself says he has no charity for the Jews, his own people, who as committed idealists are working to create the "ghastliness" he deplores. To the Kaballistic mind this is a necessary phase of the Great Work. The Ordo, the Pax Judaica, can only be harvested out of the Chao.
Contrast this with the great Jewish American Chess Master and Truth-teller: Bobby Fisher, who exemplified so much of what America could have been (and the Jewish role in it, I might add). Now. Bobby was definitely on the side of the second commandment of Moses. He was prepared to deliver the bad news [and he did with both barrels] and take the consequences if it would de-programme his own people, get them out of this thing and help America.
I was at university during the Fisher / Spassky matches. One of the refectories set up a closed circuit tv system so that students between lectures could follow the match. This place was packed out. I usually came in just before commencement. I was usually at the back standing in the cafeteria line when the deafening shout of "Pawn to E2" went up. If you were two blocks away, you knew that Fisher had opened his game. This is the America that might have been.
Look at how Levy nails 400 years of dialectical history in a single paragraph. His analysis of "Napolean" as an "antagonist of the Revolution" is masterful. Not even Rakovsky who used the same example of Napoleon in criticising Stalin as a "Bonaparist" - one who had hijacked the Revolution for his own political objectives" - managed to just nail it as deftly as Levy.
Clearly, Oscar Levy does not command or serve any of the vectors created by the Kabal and workshopped in its social Masonry for their Great Work of the Ordo ab Chao. His remarks are the remarks of one who sits above the dialectical positions that the Golems of the Kabal and their ideologies must play out in terms of the Sephiroth on the Grand Chessboard. Using the pillars of the Kaballah, I think it would be fair to say that he is neither Chesed or Gevurah. He speaks as one who lives, works and thinks in the balance of those who operate the dialectic itself - a member of the Kabal.
This is a page straight out of the Protocols of Zion written by one who was a member of the ancient Babylonian priesthood, a Kabal that surfaced as the Elders of the Pharisees with their Babylonian oral law (the Tradition of the Elders) in the pages of the New Testament.