Direct Link to Latest News


Pussy Fury: What Does it Mean?

December 18, 2018

(Hear my pussy roar! WTF?)
What's behind women protesting by dressing up as vaginas and wearing "pussy hats"? I am asking my knowledgeable readers to explain this bizarre behaviour. Is it a renunciation of their feminine modesty and femininity itself? Do these mutants think their vagina is the source of their power?  Do they suffer from Personality Deficit  Disorder? Below is my explanation but  I am not satisfied.  Please help!

Are Womyn's Protests a Plea for Male Love?
Could it be sexual frustration? Experienced men know women make themselves most unattractive when they are feeling most unloved. Self described "nasty women" are crying out for male love.
In The Vagina Monologues, Jewish author Eve Ensler laments this lack of male attention to her genitals. "My vagina wants to go deeper. It's hungry for depth. It's hungry for kisses, kindness. It wants to stop being angry. It wants everything. It wants to want. It wants."

Women need satisfying sex as much as men or even more. They are not getting it from feminized boyfriends or anonymous hookups. Why would a stranger care about her satisfaction? Having sex is not making love. Women are narcissistic-masochistic. A man's love-making is their narcissistic reward for their masochistic sacrifice. Men love women for putting up with them. 

Sexual intercourse symbolizes a a husband's possession of his wife and her surrender to him. Her sexual satisfaction depends on this self-effacement. Women instinctively want to belong to the man she loves and bear his children. This is why promiscuity is dehumanizing and does not work. A woman can only belong to one man. Our parent's generation had it right when they insisted on sex within wedlock. (This is also the key to a satisfying sex life.)

Women universally want to be put to use. They are instrumental by nature. Apart from procreation, they help make things happen. That's why they were secretaries and nurses in the past. They are hypergamous and want to serve a man, their husband. 

The movie "The Business of Strangers" (2001) illustrates what happens to  women when they reject this universal role and adopt feminist shibbolethsVictims of a diabolical  plot, they have mutated, and need a man's love in order to be themselves again. 

This decidedly Un-PC movie could not be made today because we live in a de facto Communist (Masonic Jewish-controlled) society which has killed freedom of expression. Without freedom, they can be no genuine culture. The career of brilliant writer and director Patrick Stettner has gone nowhere. Western culture is controlled agitprop. Thanks to the Internet, you can watch this fine movie here.    We'll never forgive CIA stooges like Gloria Steinem and Communist Party hacks like Betty Friedan  and the mass media for destroying the lives of millions.

nasty.jpg(left. Self described "Nasty Women" Ashley Judd and Madonna. See Judd's psychotic speech.) 

Nola Girl Dissects Ashley Judd   (thanks Matt)

The Effect of Sexual Deprivation on Women 
Updated from Jan 2010 and March 2017

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

An excellent independent movie, "The Business of Strangers" (2001) explores the effect feminism has had on modern women. Writer/director Patrick Stettner illustrates how American women have traded the honored social role of wife and mother for the sterility, and banality of corporate culture.

This is what movies should do: Reflect modern life. Yet this brilliant movie bombed (or was torpedoed) at the box office, making less than $500,000. Fortunately, critics liked it and it is widely available on DVD.

stranger.jpgTwo women are stranded overnight at an airport hotel while on a sales trip. Stockard Channing, left, plays "Julie Styron," successful divorced 45-ish VP Sales whose best friend is her secretary.

Julia Stiles plays Paula Murphy, a tough 25-ish "writer" who works the overhead projector.

The movie shows how career has supplanted family for women like Styron. Feminism promised that women could have both, but this did not happen.

Forty seven per cent of 40-something women with professional degrees have no children. Only 14% of these women said they didn't want children.  ("Creating a Life: Professional Life and the Quest for Children" by Sylvia Ann Hewitt)

Styron is fired without warning. But when she immediately lands an even better job as a CEO, she is strangely indifferent.


In the hotel bar with Styron, Paula  recognizes Nick Harris a slick young corporate head-hunter played by Fred Weller. He is the man who raped her best friend years ago at a frat party. She lures him to Styron's suite and puts tranquilizers in his drink.  

After he passes out, the two women indulge in an orgy of hatred over his unconscious body. They undress him, cover him with obscene graffiti, smear blood and strike him. Both women clearly despise men. Murphy confides it was actually she who had suffered the rape. 

However, later it emerges that Nick is a rapist in her mind only. Styron learns that he had never been to the city where the rape had supposedly taken place. 

Talk about hate. Men are "rapists" because they are not giving women the love they need. The result is self-loathing and resentment against men. Feminism first makes women and men incompatible; then it exploits women's frustration and rage. It channels this into support for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.


The great Sigmund Freud was unable to answer this question despite  "thirty years of research into the feminine soul."

Chaucer's "Wife of Bath" knew the answer: Woman wants to be loved. She'll do anything for love, even become a feminist.

Many Western women today are dysfunctional because they are getting contradictory messages. Society tells them to be "strong and independent," i.e. successful in a career.

But this behavior is masculine and makes men feel redundant. Men don't like these women. Thus women are doing what society tells them to do, yet are not getting the male love they expect and need.

Women are loved when they put their husband and children before themselves. It is feminine to self efface. Men love these women because they become part of them.

A single friend characterized a typical date this way. He describes his work and seeks affirmation and respect. She describes her work and seeks affirmation and respect from him. They never see each other again. (They are already competing.)

This is NOT how heterosexuals mate. Women are hypergamous, which means they seek men of higher power and status. Nurses marry doctors.

There are over 900 Women's Studies Programs in the United States teaching impressionable young women to deny their biological differences. Men have ten times the testosterone levels as women.  Yet, according to "Issues in Feminism: An Introduction to Women's Studies" femininity is "patriarchal mind control." They are told "the best slaves are the ones who don't even know they are slaves." Who authorized this indoctrination in lesbian dysfunction?

This vicious state-sponsored hoax is ruining millions of lives. The CIA and the Rockefeller Foundation sponsor it. The super rich use tax-exempt foundations to promote Communism, according to the 1954 Reese Committee Report of the U.S. Congress.

Feminism is another manifestation of Communism, which was always dedicated to the destruction of marriage and family. People without stable families are easy to distract and control. Sex starved, isolated, and dysfunctional, the few children they have are also messed up. The U.S. birth rate is at the lowest point in history.


A woman's elaborate reproductive apparatus has a profound influence on her psyche. Each month she produces an egg and she is devoted to seeing that egg fertilized, then to giving birth and raising a child.

On the other hand, a woman is the fertile ground for a man's spirit to grow. First she accepts his spirit. Then she accepts his seed, from which a child grows.

Men need to be lovingly received and affirmed. Women need to be possessed and cultivated. This is wholeness. Their child symbolizes it.

When this connection is stymied, we have arrested development. Many women become angry and psychotic like Styron and Murphy. Men have become detached and selfish. Both are obsessed with sex.

The media makes women appear like remote goddesses but they are passionate sexual creatures that need committed love and direction from a man.

In a true marriage, two people become one. Each complements the other. Women's strengths should not be the same as men's and vice versa.

Independence is the big issue in feminist marriages. They are mergers, a pooling of assets designed to achieve economic and sexual synergies. The two people fail to bond and remain immature. They struggle for power and break up.


Heterosexual society has been under sustained psychological attack designed to arrest human development and decrease population. Feminism is the weapon of choice.  It encourages women to deny their femininity and act like men.

Feminine women are characterized by selflessness. They are not hunters. They are not killers. They are a little vulnerable in a worldly sense. How do men respond to them? By wanting to nurture and protect them. This is how men love. This is what women want.

In "The Business of Strangers" both women have become hunters. As a result, they hate men but worse they hate themselves. Victims of a diabolical  plot, they have mutated. They need a man's love in order to be themselves again.
Related- Naked Scenes from the Yellow Vest Protest

-----Feminism Causes Frigidity said Female Psychiatrist
Rich- Women seek money over love
Gender and Ethnic Conflict used by Elites to Divert Public 

First Comment by the late Dan Butler-

I will have to watch this film this weekend because the scene with the women gloating over the body of their victim is blatant reference to the fable of Judith in the Bible. 

The seduction/beheading of Holofernes by wealthy Judith and her proletariat maid. 
Judith remains the role model of a Jewish heroine. 
But for Italian Renaissance painters,  Judith exemplified a beguiled man's downfall at the hands of scheming women.    There are many priceless paintings of this scene by a host of Old Masters. 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Pussy Fury: What Does it Mean?"

Ken Adachi said (December 18, 2018):

Concerning the fate of America women. Not ALL American women agree with the conduct or attitudes of the sort of retards seen in the photo. Homely girls have traditionally banded together in rebellious confrontations, especially on college campuses, to get attention. So what else is new?

So many modern girls today are raised in a family without both parents to guide them in all the ways that young female minds need to be guided to develop into a sweet, loving, and caring female prepared for marriage and motherhood - who will EXUDE femininity and female charm as a RESULT of that sort of upbringing. But the cretins you see in your photos have largely lacked that sort of home life, so they look and act like, well, cretins.

Those females who have allowed the poison of Feminism to ruin their chances for marriage, family and happiness will die off because 1) no tradition-minded male WANTS to marry them and 2) lacking children to pick up their "ways" is the quickest Road to Extinction. The greatest training ground for Marxist feminism is college campuses, especially in Canada. So if you're currently part of a two parent (as in male & female married couple) family who wants to see YOUR daughter also become part of a two parent family, you better make DAMN sure you find the right school to pay for you daughter's education that will meet YOUR standards of morality and societal beliefs. This can ONLY be a PRIVATE school that meets your criteria of excellence. Even if that means going OVERSEAS to find it.

For American guys anxious to find a feminine, loving, non-feminist for lover and wife, go to Asia and find yourself one. There are millions of them over there. Japan is a good start. You'll be glad you did.

Quartermaster said (December 18, 2018):

re. Dan Butler comment

Just a line to say that using a bible wide search program, I have not been able to find a reference to a "Judith" except where Esau takes several wives, with one being named Judith. There is a reference in the Apocrypha, specifically the book of Judith, but those books are not regarded as canonical canonical by protestants, and their accuracy is doubted by most scholars.

David S said (December 18, 2018):

This is simply a continuation of the propaganda, "men are violent" and "women are victims" used by
the multi-billion divorce/domestic violence industry to make a quick buck across the western world.

"The Vagina Monologues gave birth to V-Day, a global activist movement to end violence against
all women and girls (cisgender, transgender, and those who hold fluid identities that are subject to
gender based violence)."

Peter G said (December 18, 2018):

When children are taught maths regarding fractions they are told to look "for the lowest common denominator"

These women wearing vagina hats are attempting to do something similar in a social sense but they have lost the plot and are not using base ten anymore.

No wonder they are unloved.

Plus they're both pig's arse ugly.

G said (December 18, 2018):

I wanted to do a deeper analysis of this but kept coming up short, and fatigued. All I can say is, as a woman I feel terribly embarrassed and just want them and their movement to go away. Not only is it devoid of love and commitment, but so horribly superficial. And they're given time and spotlight. SICKENING!!

That you are as appalled and dumbfounded by this ugly and obnoxious display is just a testament to the real man you are, whole and wholesome. Hang tough, Henry, their 15 minutes has got to be over soon.

Philosopher said (December 18, 2018):

And now women make themselves even more unattractive!

Ayn Rand was correct on Economics. Taylor Caldwell was correct on History...

Even Ayn Rand and Taylor Caldwell BOTCHED the male - female relationship. These women undoubtedly had unsatisfying relationships with men. This was mainly due to their inferior Jewish Genetics. - Both women, although "smart", were somewhat ugly.

I found in Philosophy that GENETICS plays the greatest part. If you ignore Genetics, you simply miss the bulls eye in analysis. Christianity is a DEFECTIVE [and "Blanking Out"] Philosophy. Jewish Philosophy only corrupts, sneers and spits on Superior Aryan Idealism.

You went as far as Christianity.... a Jewish version yet!!!! Focus on Genetics for a change.

Women just appear to BE ignoble, scheming, and insincere in the main. - My personal experiences with them confirm this.

Genetics of the MALE also determines his reality in life. Genetics puts a cold objective inescapable harshness to life it`self.

Example; Jews can`t measure up - the "Jewish Curse"...Genetics again.

AZ said (March 18, 2017):

“Isn’t it time in reference to our personal evolution, to look at the background of our own personal wants and needs concerning the fulfillment of our emotional and spiritual needs in the outer world? And so heal the wounds of not fulfilled needs in our youth within ourselves. Men and woman alike through all kinds of social engineering programs are being made dependent on the outer world.

Why do men and woman need an outer world to fulfill their most basic needs for personal growth and development. Isn’t the evolution in our time about individuation and attaining mastership over ones inner and thereby outer life? Isn’t it all about learning to live according the blueprint of one’s soul, discovering one’s own unique qualities through life’s personal lessons and contributing those to the whole of humanity?

We are so used to think in a generalization of concepts of the mind, that each concept becomes a belief. In another article on this site I read: “For every believer there is a deceiver”.

So in my opinion it is time to free ourselves of mind concepts and live the life according to our soul’s blueprint. That is an unique individual blueprint and can’t be generalized."

Gordon said (March 18, 2017):

Your recent essay "Womyn's Protests are a Cry for Male Love" is some of your very best work. I know : I lived it. First, going through a custody battle against a woman who was de-ranged, precisely as you explain.

Later ; on the front lines of the Pro-Life thing in the early 1990s. Back then, I was astonished at the vehemence displayed by the pack of feminazi mutts ... literally frothing at the mouth as they screamed bloody murder at us for publicizing what really goes on with the abortion industry. Eventually, it dawned on me that they'd lost their minds in hysteria ... raging at me as the cartoon character set up by feminism as its whipping boy = 'single, straight white Christian man who has no business disparaging a woman who chooses to kill her baby'.

Now I know that they were actually venting their anguish because their bodies were longing for a baby, whilst my generation of males, used and abused them, especially, participating in the Big Lie of 'birth control', so as to cheat them out of their birthright.

at the end of that chapter, the guys who were seen as the extremists in the anti-abortion movement ... Paul de Paris, Neil Horsley, etc... explained that the root of the abortion holocaust in the white nations, is the same message as brought to the nation by the ancient prophets : "we are Israel. Our God is among us. We and our fathers have sinned"

VW said (March 17, 2017):

Your take on feminism is so refreshing to read. At last someone who understands what the subject is all about.. and I agree with you entirely. Feminism is about division and dividing. It has stealthily been drip-fed to the masses, drip by drip until woman verses man has become the norm.

Some young women today (I say 'some' because hopefully there are others that have wise relations or friends to guide them to think otherwise) grow-up beLIEving men are competition and the enemy. A woman who lives in my neighbourhood encouraged her 12 year old daughter to start a feminism club at school. That girl is already on the road to disaster, but her mother is oblivious.

Nail-on the-head that 'Women's Protests are a Cry for Male Love'. The encouraged competition between female and male creates a vicious circle.... and round and round it goes.... women craving men's attention and (as you mentioned) looking for love but mostly having sex and finding no love, because sex without love only leaves a yearning for more sex, and no fulfilment. It's not all about sex either but wanting a good wholesome relationship and to be loved in general. Also, an unconscious desire to be able to love in a wholesome manner.

The answer can only be to unravel years of indoctrination which ain't easy. But if society is to become
balanced, then a healthy relationship been men and women has to be found. It will not be easy though while the illuminati elite remain in power feeding poison to the people.

Louise said (March 17, 2017):

I was a secretary for many years and fell in love with my male superior. Maybe it was my imagination that he was in love with me without showing it. We never spoke about it. After five years of working together closely he married a woman ('another woman' in my mind) and let himself be bullied daily by his female feminist superior.

I was angry, began to realize very slowly that his silent love for me was only in my imagination, got sick and fired after a few months. Never wanted to see him again, acted like a jealous, betrayed lover. I guess lots of (young, single) women get into this kind of confusing emotions while working with male colleagues and having a so called career just because they have been misled.

It has taken me many years to realize all this and understand why my feelings were hurt so bad: all those years I was hoping that my superior would suddenly express his real feelings of great love for me. Followed immediately by a first romantic kiss. But all he ever did was using my great competence and endless support, not consciously probably.

All these years I was wasting all my energy in serving him and the company. From time to time I still dream about him and me having a romance. It's been 8 years now since I last saw him. But understanding, thanks to your website, Henry, and others, but mostly by reading and understanding the Scripture, has healed me and I thank God for it. And to prove the level of absurdness: all this time I was married. My husband was too drunk too often in that period, but has stopped drinking and our marriage is fairly happy now, thanks to the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

RL said (March 17, 2017):

Who cares what they want. Western men have been giving them more and more until there is nothing left in the name of "love". Men who give a shit what women "think" are not men. Love is to give them what they need. What they need is to be put back in their place. That's what feminism is about. They want men to stand up to them and be men. Give a child everything and don't correct it and see what kind of monster grows up.

Dan A said (March 17, 2017):

I'm glad you explore such things Henry.

I believe each gender needs each other in some way. And I believe feminism is encouraged and developed by the elite as part of their deviant social engineering scheme to destroy families. And decrease the population. I read once the VAWA was passed due to feminists promising Clinton votes if he passed the VAWA.

I'm quite sure I was married to a feminist. A woman who never loved or cared about me in any noticeable way, yet I still took very good care of her in a number of different ways during the course of our marriage. Any success I had in my life married to her caused her distress and anger. My ex wife never spent any time with her daughter, our daughter, until about the age of 10, when she felt she could manipulate my daughter so it seems. And she did that quite well I'm sorry to say.

My ex wife was very beautiful when I married her. I did see my ex wife 2 years ago because I wanted to see what she looked like after all the damage she did. And I swear evil was dripping from her face. She looked horrible and frightening actually.

I believe feminism is wrong because it is wrong to live your life hating another, my gender, so deeply. Penis envy perhaps. I really don't know.

Connie said (March 21, 2016):

Beyond the "feminist" marriage, don't look now, but we've gotten to "post-feminist" marriages. (I mean, the few that exist that aren't between gays). My millennial kids don't believe it when I say it was once a disgrace for a man's wife to go to work. Now they wonder whether or why they should have children.

The sex act being no longer sacred, today a new baby symbolizes nothing. It is basically a lifestyle choice that SHE makes - a cute accessory, if she can manage it, and he seems to be just the stud. They may even conceive in a test tube or rent a womb, but no matter, the child will be parented by schools/daycare, and may easily be forgotten in a hot car on a warm day.

Al Thompson said (March 21, 2016):

Feminism seems to promote fornication. This is a direct assault on the proper relationship between a man and a woman. And it is my view, that men and women should not have any sex until they get married.

Women don't realize what a nice life they can have by staying at home raising the children while the man goes out into the world to earn a living. Women can help with that if necessary, but I think it is much better for the children if mom is at home during the day. This will also allow for homeschooling which is far better for the children than putting in the communist training camps called public schools.

If I had it all over to do again, I would not have sex with any woman until marriage. I personally think that fornication screws up the relationship because sex is so intimate and personal. For men and women, this lowers the dignity of men and women before God. But all of us have been over sexualized by the various media and they have helped to destroy the family. And that is the whole point of communism. To wreck the family and make people dependent upon the state.

It is much better for young people to get married earlier because the physiology is geared toward giving birth in the younger years. Rotting in high school and college is extremely depressing but raising children is the most fun I've ever had in life. Feminism is intended to destroy the joy of living and in its place, the living hell of communism.

Matt said (March 21, 2016):

I don’t agree that women need sex in the same frequency and way as men do. There are just few days in the month when a woman might need sex which coincides with an increase of her testosterone levels. Outside this period sex for a woman is more of an act of validation rather that physiological need. Men are hormonally driven more than women.

In fact, the sexual life of women needs to be controlled in order for a society to function orderly. People in the past knew that women’s sexual nature is very primitive and it could be even dangerous if uncontrolled.

The reason why modern women seem to be needing so much sex is because (as you say) they do not get enough of the masculine energy they need to balance their feminine side and because they are being over sexualized by the current culture.

Women can not get love through sex, because love is not sex. Sex is a body function to reproduce the species that is made pleasurable so that we will take the time and energy to reproduce. That is all. It is not love or hate or anything else.

Bruno said (January 2, 2010):

Your recent post on women is quite timely. Just a week ago there was an occasion when I thought ‘gosh the poor girl is total confused and conflicted’. It spontaneously occurred to me that women in general are biologically female, psychologically wishful men, emotionally feminine, socially achievers, instinctively motherly, professionally competitive, psychiatric ally multiple personalities, and always always contrary to men.

All at the same time they dress such as to appeal to the male sexual instincts. It was a rather frightening insight because the end stage cannot be described other than the Marilyn (Monroe) syndrome which is nothing short but suicide.

Nobody can live with themselves in such permanent internal conflict without being eaten up. After you had it your way all your life you wake up one day and see clearly that you had absolutely nothing but self-deceit, pride, deception, duplicity, and aggression. And all I did, my crime against feminist superiority doctrines, was to start an e-mail with “Dear” and mention “love” somewhere along the way, although quite well defined and all. These two words alone create such emotional devastation in women that it is truly shockingly breathtaking. And there is nothing you can do. Mere words do not break the feminist programming code, deeply imbedded in the subconscious mind. So it will have to run its course.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at