Stephen Coleman said (October 18, 2012):

Thank you for the article. It helps me put another piece of the puzzle together. My father was on his way to the invasion of Japan when the atomic bomb was dropped. He was told by his commanding officers that the bomb had saved a million American lives.

But he was lied to and went to his grave believing this. Japan had already been defeated, its people were starving and its ports were successfully blockaded. So why were the bombs dropped?

Bertrand Russell convinced Harry Truman to drop the bomb to frighten the whole world to accept to a one world government.

Russell (the author of the cold war) tried to convince Pres. Eisenhower to nuke Moscow but the President refused. Lucky for the USA and world this did not happen as the Soviets had already developed thermonuclear weapons under the scientist V. Vernadsky.

Brian said (October 18, 2012):

The Illuminati wage wars and orchestrate them every step of the way.

Over the years I've been trying to get my mind around the masonic intent for America at the outset of the "War of Independence". And when I look at World figures like Roosevelt (33rd degree mason) and Churchill (same? I forget), I've concluded that it was probably no different with men like Washington, Franklin et al in their complicity with the overall agenda. Although I think it's important to consider the particular nature of what it is they think they're being complicit with. After all, those at the very pinnacle of the Illuminati chain of command know how crucial it is to maintain their control of a "need to know only" basis on the pyramidal structure.

When the American Revolutionary War was fomented by the British money power the battle was on, and I used to think that the British army, in their supreme arrogance were complacent with the foregone conclusion that there was no way this ragtag assemblage of "Patriot rabble" could beat them on the battlefield. But defeat them they did, and historians attribute it to a combination of that aforementioned complacency and the cunning guerrilla tactics of the Americans. Now I say not so fast. The fix was in.

Although the British regulars were correct in their confidence to overwhelm and annihilate the American army, they were never given the chance because it wasn't part of the Illuminati long-term plan for America in playing their role in implementing a NWO.

Given that WW2 was a much more recent event, we can point to examples of where the "fix was in" regarding the seemingly mystifying actions of Agent Hitler in sabotaging the German war effort. Whereas the American Revolution was so long ago it's tougher to get a read on what could be seen as equivalent strange decisions and actions taken then. Although one thing that comes to mind, in addition to the story of Benedict Arnold, involves the curious non-action of the British garrison in New York City. Perhaps some scholars of that era could provide some insight on this, within the context of Illuminati orchestration of course.

Mike said (October 18, 2012):

I feel gratefull that you have been exploring the subject of Hitler, WW2, and the various leaders involved. No one else has really been doing this. As for Hitler, i've puzzled for years over weather he was a dupe, shill or mind controlled zombie. Hard to imagine that someone who could present such a strong image and correctly identify the Judaic conspiracy could be a shill. Possibly the biggest indictment is that he proceeded to act as though the US could not be pulled into the war again as in WW1.

Jim Stone has an article with video about the Mossad sniping Americans in Iraq, which fits in with your assessment of the happenings at Normandy. Looking at history, there are a good number of assaults that seem to defy strategic sense as though designed for failure. General Van Valkenhein's assault at Verdun comes to mind. Also Burnside's attack across an open field against a fortified position in the Civil War. He went on after the war to work for one of the big banks, and become Governor of Maryland.

Len said (October 18, 2012):

Debra said:
"The effect of WW1 was in 1917 when Britain handed Israel [Palestine, actually. - lch] over to the fake-Jews. The effect of WWII was in 1948 when the fake-Jews claimed the nation Israel as their own. A progression of effects (from WW3) might be when a satanic temple stands on Mount Moriah."

Chilling. Truly chilling. I think probably you summed it up quite well. The ultimate goal of "the Royals" and "the Illuminati elite" is the "rulership from Jerusalem,"
including control of the Temple Mount, and the enslavement of all Mankind under their "false Millennium", - and 1000 year reign that Hitler only dreamed of.

Kurt said (October 18, 2012):

My belief (based on nothing more than an amateur reading of alternative and revisionist history) is that the Big Money Boys financed both the Communists and the National Socialists in order to create the dialectic which resulted in the destruction of white Christian power. I think Hitler was deceived that he had the backing of English race patriots like King Edward VIII in a battle to destroy Jewish Bolshevism. He was naive to the fact that the Jews of the Rothschild clan controlled England and the Royals.

WW2 propaganda is used to discredit Nationalism. It is preposterous to believe that all the Nazi’s and members of the multinational SS units were motivated by an evil hate of non Germanic people and not simply national self preservation. You and I disagree on the extent of the ‘Holocaust’.

Regardless, look at how the story has morphed in the last 60 years. It grew from ‘look at what the nasty Nazi’s did’ to ‘look at what the nasty Germans did’ (Goldhagen’s ‘Hitler’s Willing Executioners’). Today there are House of Horrors Holocaust Museums in all the Western nations including those that bled to defeat the Third Reich.

The West is being dismantled before our very eyes with ‘Multiculturalism’ and ‘Diversity’ while we play the Golem for the NWO against their last enemy, the Islamic States of the Middle East.

Debra said (October 17, 2012):

Orchestrate:- to arrange or direct a situation to produce a desired effect, especially surreptitiously.

From Henry's articles we can see why Hitler is referred to as the anti-christ (who was wounded, but lives ). But what desired effects? The effect of WW1 was in 1917 when Britain handed Israel over to the fake-Jews. The effect of WWII was in 1948 when the fake-Jews claimed the nation Israel as their own. A progression of effects (from WW3) might be when a satanic temple stands on mount Moriah.