Direct Link to Latest News

 

Was WW2 a Genocidal War on Germany?

September 17, 2017

germany-must-perish.jpg
(left, Mainstream (((media))) endorsed sterilization of 48 million Germans before any Jewish mass murders took place.)

Does the focus on the Jewish holocaust 
obscure the fact that World War Two
may have been a genocidal war on Germany
by the Illuminati central bankers? 

It seems farfetched but, if we consider that
Angela Merkel is pursuing a genocidal
migrant policy today, this "revisionist" interpretation may
have merit. 

I present six excerpts that support the view that the Illuminati 
had a long-term policy of exterminating Germans, which has been extended to white nations in general.  







1) Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the "American Federation for Peace." The first edition of this slim volume was published in early 1941. The United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman's fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman's plan a "sensational idea."

175px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-17049,_Joseph_Goebbels_spricht.jpg
Germany's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. "This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy," Goebbels privately commented. "If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn't have done a better job."

At his direction, the German press played up Kaufman's call for genocide. A front-page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a "Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People" and a work of "Old Testament Hatred." Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941. 

(More examples at link):

"There remains but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism -- and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal [.......]When one realizes that such health measures as vaccination and serum treatments are considered as direct benefits to the community, certainly sterilization of the German people cannot but be considered a great health measure promoted by humanity to immunize itself forever against the virus of Germanism."

"The population of Germany, excluding conquered and annexed territories, is about 70,000,000 almost equally divided between male and female. To achieve the purpose of German extinction it would be necessary to only sterilize some 48,000,000 -- a figure which excludes, because of their limited power to procreate, males over 60 years of age, and females over 45."

2. The Hooton Plan -- A plan similar to Kaufman's was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined "Breed War Strain Out of Germans" in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an "outbreeding" plan that would "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities." (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

hotton.jpg
The Harvard University professor's proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. "The objects of this measure," wrote Dr. Hooton, "include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals."

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. "During this period," he went on, "encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males."

mixed-sex.jpg

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany's population and immigration policies. Since the nation's defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

3.  The Morganthau Plan - In the summer of 1944 the Jewish U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry R. Morgenthau, Jr. and Jewish Assistant Secretary Harry Dexter White,a Soviet agent,  devised the Morgenthau Plan, more formally known as the Treasury Plan for the Treatment of Germany...If adopted, the Morgenthau Plan would have led to the death by starvation and pestilence of ten million Germans in the first two years after the war ended, in addition to the one million who had perished in the saturation bombing and the three million killed in the enforced expulsion from Germany's eastern territories. Both Roosevelt and Churchill unthinkingly initialed the Plan, as these documents show. 

merkel-bnai-brith.jpg
(Angela Merkel with her B'nai B'rith handlers, making Masonic sign) 

Stated in its simplest terms, the objective of the Morgenthau Plan was to de-industrialize Germany and diminish its people to a pastoral existence once the war was won. If this could be accomplished, the militaristic Germans would never rise again to threaten the peace of the world. This was the justification for all the planning, but another motive lurked behind the obvious one. The hidden motive was unmasked in a syndicated column in the New York Herald Tribune in September 1946, more than a year after the collapse of the Germans. The real goal of the proposed condemnation of "all of Germany to a permanent diet of potatoes" was the communization of the defeated nation. "The best way for the German people to be driven into the arms of the Soviet Union," it was pointed out, "was for the United States to stand forth as the champion of indiscriminate and harsh misery in Germany."

4. The Genocidal Terror Bombing of German cities which killed between 500,000 and three million civilians depending on the source. 
"A major awkwardness concerning Churchill's conduct of the war lies in the secret British policy of so-called 'area bombing', adopted early in 1942 and outlined by (Lord) CP Snow in the 1960 Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (published in his book Science and Government, Oxford University Press 1961). Snow had an insider's view of the development of this policy. He outlines how the sinister Professor FA Lindemann (later to become Lord Cherwell, Churchill's chief scientific adviser), persuaded the British Cabinet to adopt the policy of directing bombing campaigns primarily against German working-class housing. 'Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs; factories and "military objectives" had long since been forgotten, except in official bulletins, since they were much too difficult to find and hit' (p 48). Snow asks, 'What will people of the future think of us? Will they say.. we were wolves with the minds of men? Will they think that we had resigned our humanity? They will have the right.' (p 49). Fortunately, Snow needn't have worried. There have been and remain such powerful vested interests committed to preserving the myths of World War II that even the history departments of universities have in most cases assisted with the cover-up. [David Irving says Bomber Harris told him Dresden took place on Churchill's insistence.]


CR.jpg

Conclusion

This genocidal Masonic Jewish war against Germans has been expanded to include white nations in general. 



----------------    I recommend Europa-- Final Battle  for the German perspective on WW2. Exposes the Allied leaders for the Communist swine they were. Tends to whitewash Nazis and deny Hitler was false opposition. He must have known UK and USSR were run by same people who funded him.


First Comment by Scott:

Another component of this program, which has been expanded to other nations is the de-industrialization.  Over the last several decades, manufacturing facilities from the U.S., Canada, Europe and likely Australia and New Zealand have been relocated to 3rd World nations.  This was accomplished through excessive taxes and lawsuits against these companies, who were re-routed to Mexico, China, etc or closed up shop completely.. 

 The lure of cheaper labor was the incentive not the cause.  In addition, 3rd World immigration has been brought into the same (mostly) Caucasian countries.  So, while it's true that the propaganda is eager to proclaim "strength in diversity" and express glee at < 50% white population by 2050, there are other benefits to TPTB.  

The 3rd World immigrants are more difficult to assimilate with too many differences in ethnicity, language, religion, etc. (the people won't unite!).  They're used to poverty, it drives down wages with excessive unskilled labor and makes voters more likely to require social services and become loyal constituents for liberal parties.  This occurs all the while the white middle class is reduced and eliminated. 





Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Was WW2 a Genocidal War on Germany?"

Peter said (September 17, 2017):


They don't need their goddamn unholy wars no more (sic).

Jim Stone this week (see 82.221.129.208) has highlighted a scientific study showing that women in the USA (at least) who have had their second flu shot are 600% more likely to have spontaneous abortions (up from 14% to 77%), same as what the tetanus shots did to thousands of Philippine women decades ago. That figure does not include willful abortions.

The side fact that the Jews and Amish have the old-fashioned autism rates (1:10,000) contrasted with the rest of us (1:50) is also telling.

The book should be republished as "Goyim must perish" and be Kosher stamped as pro-Semitic.


Tony B said (September 17, 2017):

Robert K [below] is correct, of course, but that was the British reason. As far as the real rulers, Rothschilds, etc., they never seem to create something as major as a war without the aims of several agendas in mind. Like the overthrow of the Christian Czarist rule in Russia, which was rapidly becoming a world power, and then, for WW2, same reason for the Brits but also the Hitler "stab in their back" by having Germany create its own money without the Rothschild middleman. There were, no doubt, other nefarious agendas involved.


Robert K said (September 17, 2017):

Britain started both world wars by declaring war on Germany. According to the Daily Mail (in an article no longer accessible because the newspaper's search function, like those of other "news sources", has been rendered useless by patently devious modification) in 1914 King George V insisted to his Cabinet that, for economic reasons, some pretext must be found to start a war with Germany. Churchill and his hell-bent-for-war friends worked to get a conflict with Germany going in 1939.

Are these facts conclusive as regards ultimate responsibility? No (because history is always subject to revision), but they should at least be taken into account in studying such events. Instead, all the MSM offer the public is stale war propaganda reiterated with hypnotic effect.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at