Direct Link to Latest News


The Great Jewish Masquerade Pt. 1

May 9, 2018


THE GREAT JEWISH MASQUE is a 55-page booklet published in the 1930's

by Arnold Leese (1878-1956) which purports to reveal the real history of the Jews.

A veterinary surgeon, Leese was a British Nazi (remember Hitler was

TIME 'Man of the Year' in 1938) who believed 

Organized Jewry is perpetrating a fraud on humanity.  

Judaism is not a religion because Jews are their own God. 

They are not "God's Chosen People" 

and have no historical claim to Palestine. 

 Most Jews do not understand that Judaism places them in jeopardy,

 in opposition to humanity as a whole. Look at the role of organized Jewry in starting wars

like the one beginning in the Middle East. (See Cabalist Dogma Dooms Humanity)

The Great Jewish Masque or the Ass in Lion's Skin

by Arnold Leese

Excerpt by 

The god of the Jews has never been the father of all men, an ideal of love, justice, mercy, compassion, etc. But on the contrary, the god of the Jews has always been a god of vengeance down to the tenth generation, just and merciful only to the Jews and a foe to all other peoples, denying the latter human rights and commanding their subjection to the Jews so that the Jews may appropriate their possessions and rule over them, exterminating all those who object to this arrangement.


Inevitably, in spite of themselves and of the Masque, the Jews became influenced by the higher conceptions of deity held by the peoples among whom they lived.

 And so, Jehovah became God but, be it noted, God in the strictly limited sense described. And, in the meantime, many Jews came under the influence of the "Deists" of the eighteenth century, of the rationalists, agnostics, atheists, nihilists, positivists and even the "Magicians," all of whom have appealed strongly to large numbers of Jews. 

And Jehovah has changed accordingly. Many Jews are thus Positivists and Nihilists with this important qualification: that when they speak of "God" they do not mean "Humanity" but only the Jewish part of it and while they yearn to destroy, they wish to destroy only what is "Gentile."

As of old, the Jews continue to "adopt" from the non-Jews and to imitate every new thing, idea, and the institution as it appears in the "Gentile" world. Of late, a tendency to borrow from Islam has been noticeable. And in quite recent times, the Jews have "adopted" a symbol in imitation of the "cross" of the Christians and the "star and crescent" of the Moslems.


The symbol, which the Jews have "adopted," consists of two interlaced triangles. And although it is called the "Seal of Solomon" and the "Shield of David," it is not Jewish. As a symbol, it antedates the Jews by thousands of years. As "adopted" by the Jews, the symbol is composed of two interlaced triangles, one white and the other black. In older representations, a woman is depicted in the inverted black triangle and a man in the white triangle. 

But, nowadays, the figure of "an uninitiated person," represented as a fool, is depicted in the inverted black triangle, while in the apex of the white triangle is depicted the figure of " an adept," represented as a wise man. And the whole is often surrounded by a snake with its tail in its mouth.


The symbol signifies a great many ideas, which need not be enumerated here. Nor is it necessary to examine the associated symbol of the "five-pointed star" which signifies, among other ideas, "under control" -- through the studious may be tempted to trace a connection between "the illuminated instrument," the "red star" which, adorns the "red army" of Russia, and the "star" of Saturn or Israel.


The Jews like to imagine that they are " male" and all other peoples "female." And they like to believe that they have so insinuated themselves into and entangled themselves with Gentile affairs that they cannot be dislodged.

The secret meaning of the symbol is as follows: The "uninitiated" creates a god as a magnified image of himself projected on a background of ignorance, represented by the black triangle, below which he cowers in terror of his monstrous conception. 

The" adept" also creates a god, not however by projecting his likeness upon the unknown, but by conceiving his power and knowledge as a symbol, represented by the white triangle over which he is poised because the intellect is above that which it creates. The initiate is, therefore "god" for the profane, the "adept" is the actual finite deity who stands on earth for the hypothetical "god" he has created; and he has complete power over any particular conception of divinity which he has formed, and which may at any time receive the reverence of the populace.

"Jehovah is he who overcomes nature," say the magicians. "The decisions of Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah himself asks the opinion of earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven." "Jehovah himself in heaven studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book," say the rabbis.


(The Imperial Fascist League; Leese bottom center. Although most Nazis were sincere like Leese, Nazism was false opposition created by Masonic Jewish central bankers to destroy the goyim and establish the State of Israel.)

Thus, at last, Jehovah has become the god-creating "adept" who has "the power of a completely emancipated mind over the slaves of superstition and ignorance"! And so, very often, when the Jews of today speak of "God" they mean " the Jewish people," the "adepts" of their secret societies, or "the god of Humanity," "the Jew of the Cabala," etc.

Thus, too, a "Neo-Messianist," named Baruch Levy, wrote to Karl Marx (a Jew, whose real name was Mordecai) as follows:

"The Jewish people, taken collectively, will be its own Messiah. His reign over the Universe will be obtained by the unification of the other human races, the suppression of frontiers, and the establishment of a "Universal Republic". . . In this new organization of Humanity the sons of Israel .... will become without opposition the directing element everywhere; above all, they will succeed in forcing on the working-men masses, the stable control of certain among them. The Government of the nations forming the Universal Republic will all pass, without effort, into Israelite hands, by favor of the victory of the Proletariat. Individual ownership will then be suppressed by the governors of the Jewish race who will administer in all places the public wealth. Thus will be realized the promise of the Talmud that, when the Times of the Messiah has come, the Jews will hold under their keys the properties of all the peoples of the world."


Part 2- 


--------------The God of the Cabala 


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "The Great Jewish Masquerade Pt. 1 "

George said (May 10, 2018):

Several comments. First, the oft-repeated phrase "the will of the international community" is coded language. The international community in question has nothing to do with the General Assembly of the United Nations. Whenever this phrase is used, usually in a threatening manner, it means an international community which feels it has the right to rule the world, including all its nations.

Second, Ariel Sharon reportedly said once that Israel has the right to judge the world, but no one has the right to judge Israel. The significance of this remark can hardly be overstated. That is the clear intent of the Masonically imaged Supreme Court in Jerusalem. It is intended not to judge merely Israel, but the world.

Third, there is a strange inability on the part of the Israelis to understand that they are themselves a part of the natural world. They use cruel hollowpoint bullets, which are readily available, with apparent disregard for the fact that others can easily fill the magazines of their rifles with those bullets. They use the terribly cruel weapon of white phosphorus, also readily available, with a similar apparent lack of awareness that it could eventually be used against them. Nuclear weaponry, which they regard as the ultimate force, is also available to others than themselves, although it is their clear intention that only Israel and countries thoroughly under their control can possess such weapons.

These considerations point unmistakably to the validity of the central thesis of this latest article. If one asks whether this attempt to usurp the place of God is Satanic, one need look no further than the Book of Genesis. The promise of the Serpent is that Adam will eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge and be the equal of God. Lucifer wanted even more, to displace God. Madness comes in many different forms. The desire a human or group of humans to be God is surely the ultimate form of madness.

Z said (May 10, 2018):

The Jews thinking of themselves as male is the most hilarious thing I’ve read in a while. If true, their imaginary penetration must be homosexual, which might explain why they are so fixated with promoting it.

Also the reason why they need feminism and the war on men is to weaken the men whom they try to penetrate from behind.

The Jewish conspiracy could be then described as one massive homosexual act.

But I believe, Otto Weiniger (a Jew himself) described the similarities between the Jews and the female best. Quoting him:

...In the Jew and the woman, good and evil are not distinct from one another.

The true concept of the State is foreign to the Jew, because he, like the woman, is wanting in personality; his failure to grasp the idea of true society is due to his lack of free intelligible ego. Like women, Jews tend to adhere together, but they do not associate as free independent individuals mutually respecting each other's individuality.

As there is no real dignity in women, so what is meant by the word "gentleman" does not exist amongst the Jews. The genuine Jew fails in this innate good breeding by which alone individuals honour their own individuality and respect that of others. There is no Jewish nobility, and this is the more surprising as Jewish pedigrees can be traced back for thousands of years.

The familiar Jewish arrogance has a similar explanation...

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at