RL said (November 24, 2018):

My comment Mr Berg which part of Russia are going to try and reside in the part few see thru out the world that are under threat and are afraid to even whisper anything against Putin or maybe the part you think your free and white but are Being u dear watchful eye of the communist or Zionist that are in control there also ,to me you are blind to the real situation all the key players are controlled by the same forces even USA so enjoy your new home while you have those pretty illusions of grander !
https://www.henrymakow.com/

Frank F said (November 23, 2018):

I have to respond to your latest article. I am Caucasian of Anglo/Scandinavian extraction married with kids to a Japanese woman. I have worked intimately with recent migrant-refugee populations most of my life.

I find that the love/hate relationship between migrants and their hosts are simply another facet of the human pathos. Born out of economic necessity, migrants have learned to cater to our Christian and liberal posture to get what they need while secretly despising us for their situation. They do bring crime, disease and all of the plagues that they are trying to escape from.

However, the trend toward stability and cultural assimilation is usually positive. Both in the host country then through relations in their former homelands. This is a feature of the human condition and not too different from our own ancestors experience.

Historically, we find that the "settlers", particularly in Canada, were a very diverse bunch. In Northern B.C. you will find townships that were originally established and populated by Chinese migrants that today may only have one or two token families. Usually in the restaurant trade.

The norm in human demographics is that nothing is static. Scientifically and otherwise, we still haven't a clue where we came from. Yes there appears to be an on going conspiracy to degrade populations into retrograde feudal empires but how successful was that in the past? Many of these migrants are escaping the dour confines of totalitarian regimes both on the left and right. Social experiments in nationalistic or ethnic enclaves may have had short-term successes previously but tend to be rejected by participants as your guest writer suggests in his article. The overriding theme of your blog, Henry, if I'm not mistaken, is the struggle for higher expression of human conscience. Ideological in it's external expression but very much an internal process for each individual. Good and evil generally gets decided instantaneously and is not always defined successfully through religious conditioning. I'm fairly optimistic about our spiritual evolution and am attracted to your blog among others for the same reasons. Europeans, and westerners by extension will define our own future irregardless of the influence of powerful elites and not, of course, without growing pains.

I thank you for your efforts and look forward to many more thought-provoking articles on your site.

Michael replies

It is quite revealing that the people like Mr. Frank F who support genocide via assimilation and describe it as "usually positive" are people who themselves are involved in it and are thus biased. There's a lot of evidence that mixed-race children hate themselves and their parents for it. Exceptions do exist but PROMOTING race-mixing as "usually positive" as you do is a PERVERSION. Your children will have no identity. They will be neither White nor Japanese. Yet you "celebrate" it!

I wonder why don't you promote race mixing in Japan which by the why is 98% Japanese (the rest of the 2% is also East-Asian), Or in Africa or In Iraq.

What's "usually positive" in something that has no precedent in history?. What's "usually positive" in wiping out a distinct racial and cultural branch of mankind and turning Europe itself to another version of Iraq?! (Isn't there already Iraq in existence?). What's "usually positive" in destroying the existence, culture and physical beauty of the White race and ONLY the White race in White Countries via race mixing?. What's "usually positive" in wiping and replacing the European population with a low intelligence, more criminally inclined population from Africa and the middle east?. I do not accept your pro-genocide position and your desire to see my race - in Germany and Europe - wiped out. The fact that I feel great pain seeing my race in Germany (and Europe) being destroyed means nothing to you!

And I must say that I will dedicate a lot of my energy to awaken people to the genocide that's taking place - while you just sit there and excuse this genocide as "usually positive" BECAUSE you are involved in it first hand (you are in a mixed relationship).

Again I don't criticize you for choosing that path. I just criticize you as something positive or "usually positive". (Obviously, you don't believe the White race have the right to exist). The difference between me and you is that I believe that ALL RACES have a right to exist while you believe that once race - the White race - only shouldn't exist and you do it while falsely believing that God and justice are on your side.
(God isn't on the side of race-mixing otherwise he WOULDN'T HAVE CREATED different races and cultures)

Paul said (November 23, 2018):

Many among White Nationalists would argue differently. They would say Europeans are being targeted because of their intelligence and innovation, because the industrial revolution took place in Europe (and, no, the gods did not come down to teach us).

Many, many Europeans are not Christian. Many Filipinos, for example, are. Are Filipinos being targeted? Nope.

And, yes, while Christianity played a vital role years ago in European cultures, few nowadays would be able to figure that out unless they did a great deal of research.

One observation by some coming out of the Illuminati is that nationalism, not Christianity, is the biggest threat to a NWO. And the Christianity of nowadays will rarely lead to nationalism.

James C said (November 23, 2018):

You wrote: (This is what Germans look like.)

Believe it or not, this is also what true biblical Semites look like too. If we use the biblical description of true Semites as our guide, we must conclude that true
biblical Semites are a fair-complexioned people, not a darkish-complexioned people as is commonly believed.

For example, Adam, the name of the first man, is ultimately derived from a word meaning having the ability "to show blood (in the face),
i.e., flush or turn rosy" (see Strong's Exhaustive Concordance nos. 121, 120, and 119). The white race has this ability to be red in the face because its
nonpigmented skin allows hemoglobin--the red coloring matter of blood--to show through.

Likewise king David, a direct descendant of Adam, is described as "ruddy" (1 Sam. 17:42; 16:12). The word "ruddy" in these verses is from the Hebrew word admoniy. Strong's no. 132 defines this word as "reddish (of the hair or the complexion)." To have a ruddy complexion is to thus to have a healthy red color of the face, a healthy rosiness or a blush.

And there are other biblical descriptions of true Semites.

JG said (November 23, 2018):

Excellent message by Mr. Berg.

I'm not a White American /European Christian Apologist like the many lost souls out there who let Hollywood and the MSM do their thinking for them.

The globalist powers around the world are pushing forced non-white migration in Europe and America with the goal of making them "mingled" nations that are void of structure and identity.

London is a good example of the end result of a mingled city. Crime in London is now running rampid. Poverty and homelessness are on the increase. And, London is flooded with 3rd world immigrants. Things won't and can't get any better. Strength is in unity and not in cross continental racial diversity.

The NWO globalists want to reduce the White Christian nations to the lowest common denominator of existence and this can only be achieved by flooding their nations with immigrants who have little or nothing in common with their culture or ethics.