Direct Link to Latest News

 

Andrew Joyce - The Four Pincers of Cabalist Control

October 3, 2019


triad.jpgThe Intersection of the Culture of Usury and the Culture of Zio-Wars: Paul Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson

In a brilliant essay, The Necessity of Antisemitism, Andrew Joyce identifies four elements in Organized Jewry's war on the goyim: Critique, Tolerance, Sterility, and Usury. 

In the excerpt below, Joyce describes how they control the world through debt (usury.)  While in general agreement, I am puzzled that comparatively little attention is devoted to Freemasonry. Without the active collaboration of these Gentile traitors, the Cabalist Jewish assault on mankind would falter.  





The Necessity of AntiSemitism 

By Andrew Joyce 

(Excerpt by henrymakow.com) 

"The Culture of Usury"

In a West gone wildly materialistic, it can be difficult to see the extent of Jewish usury. When you mention Jewish moneylenders to most people, the response normally relates to the Middle Ages. But Jewish usury is alive and well in modernity, and entire countries are in debt to Jewish financiers, who then pass on some of their wealth to Jewish organizations dedicated to the promotion of the three other cultures of White decline (Critique, Tolerance, Sterility). 

Paul Singer, of the Jewish "investment fund" has been described by Bloomberg as "The World's Most Feared Investor," but really he's the world's most feared exploiter of debt. The Democratic Republic of Congo owes Singer and his Jewish colleagues $90 million, Panama owes him $57 million, Peru owes him $58 million, and Argentina owes him $1.5 billion. When payments have been late, Singer seized and detained the flagship of the Argentinian Navy, and when South Korea put up a fight to prevent him from getting control of Samsung, he drove the nation's President to impeachment and imprisonment.

While these activities may appear very high-level, and distant from the reality of day-to-day life (unless you are a citizen of the Congo and Singer is blackmailing you for payment by withholding essential work on your water supply), Singer and his Jewish financial clique have a hand in almost every purchase you make, and every war your country wages. 

Singer, his son Gordin, and their colleagues Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel, have a foothold in almost every country, and have a stake in every company you're likely to be familiar with, from book stores to dollar stores. With the profits of exploitation, they fund the Culture of Sterility, boost Zionist politics, invest millions in security for Jews, and promote wars for Israel. 

Singer is a Republican and is on the Board of the Republican Jewish Coalition. He is a former board member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, has funded neoconservative research groups like the Middle East Media Research Institute and the Center for Security Policy, and is among the largest funders of the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies. He was also connected to the pro-Iraq War advocacy group Freedom's Watch. Another key Singer project was the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group that was founded in 2009 by several high-profile Jewish neoconservative figures to promote militaristic U.S. policies in the Middle East on behalf of Israel and which received its seed money from Singer.

quote-paul-singer-was-very-much-involved-with-the-anti-trump-or-as-i-say-never-trump-and-paul-donald-trump-156-50-36.jpg

Although Singer was initially anti-Trump, and although Trump once attacked Singer for his pro-immigration politics ("Paul Singer represents amnesty and he represents illegal immigrants pouring into the country"), Trump is now essentially funded by three Jews--Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson, together accounting for over $250 million in pro-Trump political money

In return, they want war with Iran. Employees of Singer's firm, Elliott Management, were one of the main sources of funding for the 2014 candidacy of the Senate's most outspoken Iran hawk, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), who urged Trump to conduct a "retaliatory strike" against Iran for purportedly attacking two commercial tankers. 

These exploitative Jewish financiers have been clear that they expect a war with Iran, and they are lobbying hard and preparing to call in their pound of flesh. As one political commentator put it, "These donors have made their policy preferences on Iran plainly known. They surely expect a return on their investment in Trump's GOP." 

When Adelson and Singer first made overtures to Marco Rubio, Trump tweeted that Rubio would be their "puppet." Trump has now taken money from the same puppetmasters but has thus far refused to go "all the way" with their demands, even firing John Bolton, a favorite of the Jewish triad. How the latter will proceed in the face of Trump's defiance on the matter remains to be seen.

"BLOATED CONSUMERISM" 


The Jewish triad behind Trump is a perfect example of the role of Jewish finance and the Culture of Usury in sustaining and advancing Jewish power and influence in contemporary society. Singer embodies usury and vulture capitalism, while Bernard "Home Depot" Marcus is symptomatic of bloated consumerism, and Adelson represents the sordid commercial exploitation of vice (gambling). There is nothing productive in the economic activity of any of these figures, their vast accumulations arising from sociopathic parasitism, ethnic nepotism, and the will to cultural decay.

We feel this decay lower down the scale since we live in a society of conspicuous consumption, funded by ever-escalating household debt. Everywhere, people buy things they don't need with money they don't have. Household debt is rising yet again in the United States. According to the New York Federal Reserve, Americans owe $13.86 trillion in household debt, slightly higher than the total amount right before the 2008 financial crisis. 

In Australia, the household debt to income ratio is above 190%, among the highest in the developed world. The same situation is seen in the U.K. Jews, of course, were involved disproportionately in the development of department stores, the fashion industry, retailing business, and other aspects of the consumer society.[22] 

Jews in late nineteenth-century Germany, as they did in several other Western countries, initiated the "consumer revolution," and "held, or at least started, the overwhelming majority of department stores and clothing and fashion houses throughout the country."[23] Werner Sombart remarked at the time that department stores were the herald of a new, degenerative economic culture, typified by "the anonymous, objectifying forces of capitalism and marketing."

 Contemporary anti-Semites saw these centers of the economic culture as "a consuming temple in two senses, as both a temple of consumption and a temple that consumes -- that is, a place of destruction, a Moloch even, that greedily devours vulnerable customers and neighbouring businesses."[24]

doritos.jpg

Today, largely worthless "branded" consumer products are overwhelmingly Jewish, are promoted via Jewish dominance of the advertising industry, and their purchase by consumers is funded by Jewish financiers. Calvin Klein, Levi Strauss, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Kenneth Cole, Max Factor, Estée Lauder, and Marc Jacobs are just some of the Jews whose very names have become synonymous with debt-fueled consumer culture and the subscribing to carefully cultivated fashion fads, while Jewish-owned companies like Starbucks, Macy's, the Gap, American Apparel, Costco, Staples, Home Depot, Ben & Jerry's, Timberland, Snapple, Häagen-Dazs, Dunkin' Donuts, Monster Beverages, Mattel, and Toys "R" Us have come to epitomize the endless and superfluous production of garbage for mass consumption on credit.

The consuming temple of debt-fueled consumerism is also linked to the cultures of Critique, Tolerance, and Sterility. So-called anti-racism, support for gender confusion, and the celebration of mass migration and multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle.

might ask what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but that's only because you're suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macy's.

-----------------

See Linde's Response-- The Judaic Imperium





Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Andrew Joyce - The Four Pincers of Cabalist Control "

Ben said (October 5, 2019):

Every time topics along these lines pop up, considering the monumental disproportion of world Jewry numbers to their global influence, I'm reminded of that oft-repeated line in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: Who are these guys?


Ken Adachi said (October 5, 2019):

Some of the Joyce conclusions are reasonable and tenable, but his logic suffers badly in other regards, Department stores or building supply stores, whether Jewish owned or not, are there for the purpose of providing a market place where modern citizens can buy the goods they need to furnish (or fix) their homes or buy clothing and shoes for the family. Buying things we need to be comfortable and to use in our daily life is technically called 'consumerism' I suppose, but is it necessarily an evil, subversive, destructive, or degenerate enterprise (as suggested by the article)?

People with a lot of money to spend have every right to waste in on Louie Vuitton or Ralph Lauren handbags that run anywhere from $5-50k (or more). A lot of wealthy women in Japan LOVE to spend a fortune on name-brand handbags solely for the status thrill it gives them to walk around Tokyo with their over-priced, name-brand handbag on their arm. If it makes them happy to buy that bag, then that's their right and it's moronic to claim that it's part of the JWO conspiracy to destroy Western Christian Civilization.

Joyce is an intelligent critic of Jewish power, but he should confine his narrative to those areas of Jewish influence which is TRULY subversive, destructive or evil in intent -- and purpose

The rebuttal article by Linde may or may not be a rebuttable, but it's a spectacular, tour de force article that everyone with a brain should read!. Kudos to Linde.


Wolfgang said (October 3, 2019):

http://www.unz.com/article/the-necessity-of-anti-semitism/dear henry oct.10.2019 the purpose of politician Merkel is to keep the young voters distracted from her insidious moslem flooding of Germany by the orders of soros+rothschild. the joung generation will loose their own german culture, history, and identity anyway and will become Moslems anyway in 20 years or killed. I only want mention an old fairy german tale delivered by the old brothers GRIMM. it had probably its origin from the times of medieval when pope and churches called a children's crusade against the Islamic occupation of Jerusalem. this tale called : DER RATTENFÄNGER VON HAMELN the ratcatcher of Hameln. in old times the population of small town Hameln had too many rats in town and there came a young flutist into town who offered to free the town of all rats. i don't know any more for which price. they agreed with him and he freed the town by all rats with his flauting .there was probably no satisfactory recompensation so he returned some month later in town. surely to a time when all the adults slept and started his flute and all the children followed his flaunting and so he abducted them forever. the same we have today with great Merkel Soros Rothschild and the Jewish propaganda media and UN NWO MASONRY.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at