French Revolution's Hidden Depopulation Agenda
January 1, 2016
(Same people behind French Revolution as Pol Pot massacres)
"Pol Pot's regime is surprisingly similar to the French Revolution, 200 years before. Both revolutions began in the French capitol of Paris. Both revolutions conducted deadly purges, resulting in the death of many. Also, when they took over, both Pol Pot and the French declared, 'This is the year zero.' They both made their own 10 day calendar and rejected the thought of any God. Both revolutions were curtailed within a decade."
And both were financed by the Illuminati Bankers.
Firmly in control by the spring of 1793, they calmly and carefully discussed the proportion of the French population to be suppressed to make France a model (communist) republic.
Before the genocide began, the population of France was 25,000,000. In early 1793 Jean Bon St André openly stated in the Revolutionary Convention, "[I]n order to establish the Republic securely in France, the population must be reduced by more than half."
More radical leaders made even more gruesome proposals. Maximilien Robespierre, the most aggressive annihilation advocate, blithely proposed that 23,000,000 be culled from the French census.
How could they believe that such a program of murder and mayhem could possibly benefit France? Obviously, they acted upon the prompting of the originators of depopulation theory, the scholars (like Jeremy Bentham) of the British East India Company (BEIC) a/k/a Illuminati Bankers. The first BEIC experiment in depopulation occurred 20 years earlier, the Bengal famine of 1770 (10,000,000 dead).
"Speeches were prepared by Bentham and translated and transported by diplomatic pouch and other means to Paris, where leaders of the Jacobin Terror, Jean-Paul Marat, Georges Jacques Danton, and Maximilien de Robespierre delivered the fiery oratories. Records of East India Company payments to these leading Jacobins are still on file at the British Museum."
How else could buffoons like Robespierre (35 years old) and St Just (27 years old) take control of France and lay waste to it? How could a simple minded, miserable worm like Pol Pot take command of the Cambodian genocide 200 years later?
Why did they turn on Robespierre? The Jacobins sickened of the endless slaughter of innocent French people. Robespierre and St Just followed the Duc d'Orleans and their sick conspirators to the gallows on July 28, 1794.
Maybe if they had marched the people of France to the French countryside and done their genocide out of sight, the Jacobins could have been more successful like their communist successor, Pol Pot, in Cambodia in the 1970s. But it took sick Illuminati minds another 200 years to dream up the Cambodian KILLING FIELDS.
and St Just met their end in a truly extraordinary turn of events. They
were never an absolute dictatorship but acted through the authority of
the National Revolutionary Convention.
Throughout 1794, they attacked their most trusted allies sending them to the guillotine one by one but when they turned on their closest allies within the Committee of Public Safety, the convention revolted in what came to be known as the Thermidorian Reaction.
the execution of Robespierre, Paris exploded into spontaneous
celebration. The remaining Jacobins, the so-called Thermidorians (seeing
the joy of the French people after they guillotined Robespierre and St
Just) lost their nerve and abandoned the depopulation scheme.
Nesta Webster attributes the end of the Reign of Terror to the spontaneous goodness of the people of Paris and she's probably correct, because the remaining leaders of the National Convention ended the terror.
Thermidoriens  finding themselves greeted on the morning of the 10th
of Thermidor (July 29, 1794) by a rapturous crowd as the deliverers of
France, were quick to see that their best chance of popularity lay in
accepting the role assigned to them. If the people thought that in
overthrowing Robespierre they had intended to overthrow the system of
the Terror, well, they would stop the Terror and shift all the blame for
the past from their own shoulders by making Robespierre the scapegoat
of the whole Terrorist party.
"For the purpose that had inspired the Robespierristes to reduce the population these opportunists cared nothing, and they were ready to fall in with any régime provided only they themselves could cling to place and power.
Thermidorien reaction was thus not the work of a political party, but a
really popular movement brought about by the force of the people's
will, which, for the first time since the beginning of the Revolution,
triumphed over the designs of the demagogues." Nesta Webster, The French
Revolution: A Study in Democracy (1919), p. 475
Also by Andrew Smith "French Didn't Have a Revolution"