Direct Link to Latest News

 

Roman Catholic Church Not Crypto Jewish

August 28, 2012


merrieoleengland.jpegLeft, Merrie ol' England, under the Catholic Church, was about the most contented, happiest land on Earth.



Tony Blizzard demands Edward Henrie explain why Masonic Jews identified the RC church as the single foremost obstacle to their world domination.




Henry, the following rebuttal is the kind of thing that inflames uninformed people against all Jews unless it is made clear that all are not a part of the conspiracy.  Plus, it is my experience that non-conspiracy Jews, such as yourself, are more active in combating these plots than are most non Jews.



by Tony Blizzard
(henrymakow.com)


Edward Hendrie's article is so full of misrepresentation of every possible type he can dream up of the true Catholic Church (pre Vatican 2, which "new order" is itself actually Protestant), plus absolutely drooling with wishful thinking, one wonders if he isn't, himself, a Talmudist, or just one of their "useful idiot" defenders.

I've heard these Protestant ravings and imaginings my whole life (I am not a Catholic) and was up in years before I ever investigated any of them.  Not a single one of these ravings holds up under unbiased investigation.  Many words from this wannabe "expert" which are, in reality, vicious libels against the Church.

Want some real TRUTH on the subject?  Try William Cobbett's "A History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland."  Cobbett, a Protestant, wrote his fully documented history using British official records in the years 1824-1827.  He minces no words about the Protestant wholesale destruction of cathedrals, churches, monasteries, and the theft of practically all Church property making the thieves a "new rich" in England whose offspring still mainly rule the isles, at least moneywise.  Not to mention the wanton slaughter of the masses who refused to give up their ancient religion for the new, state mandated, imitation.

You can back that up with the more modern, "The Stripping of the Altars, Traditional Religion in England 1400-1500" by Eamon Duffy, whose research centered at the Cambridge University Library.

It is very telling how some Protestants fume in attempts to disparage Catholicism but are not bothered at all by the Talmudists who have targeted all non-Jews (plus some Jews) for enslavement or extinction.

Here are some words out of the mouths or pens of the Talmudists themselves on the subject taken from speeches at a B'nai B'rith (Jews only masonic lodge) Convention held in Paris, France in Feb., 1936 as published in "Le Reveil du Peuple," a Parisian weekly:

"As long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come."

wolf.jpeg"We have already fulfilled part of our work, but we cannot yet claim that the whole of our work is done.  We have still a long way to go before we can overthrow our main opponent; the Catholic Church...."

"We must always bear in mind that the Catholic Church is the only institution which has stood, and which will, as long as it remains in existence, stand in our way.  The Catholic Church, with her methodical work and her edifying and moral teachings, will always keep her children in such a state of mind, as to make them too self-respecting to yield to our domination, and to bow before our future King of Israel...."

"That is why we have been striving to discover the best way of shaking the Catholic Church to her very foundations.  We have spread the spirit of revolt and false liberalism among the nations of the gentiles so as to persuade them away from their faith and even to make them ashamed of professing the precepts of their Religion and obeying the commands of their Church.  We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape!  We have given them new theories, impossible of realization, such as Communism, Anarchism, and Socialism, which are now serving our purpose....The stupid Gentiles have accepted them with the greatest enthusiasm, without realizing that those theories are ours, and that they constitute our most powerful instrument against themselves...."

"We have blackened the Catholic Church with the most ignominious calumnies, we have stained her history and disgraced even her noblest activities.  We have imputed to her the wrongs of her enemies, and have thus brought these latter to stand more closely by our side.... So much so, that we are now witnessing, to our greatest satisfaction, rebellions against the Church in several countries.... We have turned her clergy into objects of hatred and ridicule, we have subjected them to the contempt of the crowd... We have caused the practice of the Catholic Religion to be considered out of date and a mere waste of time...."

"We have induced some of our children to join the Catholic body, with the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way for the disintegration of the Catholic Church, by creating scandals within her."

"We are the Fathers of all Revolutions-even of those which sometimes happen to turn against us.  We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War.  We can boast of being the creators of the REFORMATION!  Calvin was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was trusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the Reformation."

"Martin Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends, and again, by Jewish authority and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic Church met with success...."

"Thanks to our propaganda, to our theories of Liberalism and to our misrepresentations of Freedom, the minds of many among the Gentiles were ready to welcome the Reformation.  They separated from the Church to fall into our snare.  And thus the Catholic Church has been very sensibly weakened, and her authority over the Kings of the Gentiles has been reduced almost to naught...."

"We are grateful to Protestants for their loyalty to our wishes-although most of them are, in the sincerity of their faith, unaware of their loyalty to us.  We are grateful to them for the wonderful help they are giving in our fight against the stronghold of Christian Civilization, and in our preparations for the advent of our supremacy over the whole world and over the Kingdoms of the Gentiles."

"But the Catholic Church is still alive..."

"We must destroy her without the least delay and without the slightest mercy.  Most of the Press in the world is under our Control; let us therefore encourage in a still more violent way the hatred of world against the Catholic Church."

There is plenty more but this should suffice to show that Hendrie is either an agent for the Talmudist agenda or simply a biased Protestant without a real clue.

It should also suffice to show anyone the real origins of Vatican II, which converted most of the Church into just another protesting sect.  Protesting against itself.

--

First Comment from Dan:

I must stress that it's absolutely essential everybody get used to the reality that the 'Roman Catholic Church' of history no longer exists. The Freemasons finally took the Papacy in 1958.   In turn their Pope and bishops called a Second Vatican Council to proceed to dismantle the religious/spritual aspect of the Old World Order.

The old Roman Catholic Church (pre-1958) and Freemasonry were not Jewish creations.  Freemasonry and Catholicism used to be adversaries - and both organizations ostracized Jewry from the grand lodges.  The B'nai B'rith didn't create Freemasonry, but was a spin-off of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, under the direction of Pike. 

Read the secret Masonic version of Genesis:  In their version, Jehovah was a cruel God who kept Adam and Eve prisoner.  In this version, the serpent is an angel of light name Samael who impregnates Eve with Cain.
http://www.rosicrucian.com/frc/frceng01.htm#Part_II

Masonic Bible  -  It says 'Amen' said at the end of prayer means AMON-RA.  That's a lie.  Any religious Jew can tell you 'Amen' translates to ""Ah-mayn" meaning  "so be it" or literally "It is accepted!" in Hebrew.  Freemasonry isn't Jewish.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jdrD9rwNWU


Albert Pike:
'We worship a God but it is the God that one adores without superstition'. [However,] To you Sovereign Grand Inspectors General [of the 33rd degree] we say this, that you may [in turn] repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The Masonic Religion should be by all of us initiates in the High Degrees maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine." 

[For] if Lucifer were not God, would Adonai [the God of Abraham] whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, his barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonai and his Priests calumniate him? Yes [brethren] Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonai is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods! darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil. As the pedestal is necessary for the statue and the brake to the locomotive. Thus the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonai [Allah]. Lucifer, God of Light and Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonai, the God of Darkness and Evil."

MORALS and DOGMA by Albert Pike was the 'bible' of Freemasonry for over a century.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/mas/md/index.htm









Comments for "Roman Catholic Church Not Crypto Jewish "

W said (August 30, 2012):

So much quibbling and squabbling ~ over what? Religion. The great controller of mankind's mind and reason. What a waste . So many emotions and almost no logic. G.d and satan ~ are they different? e.g. Isaiah 45 / 7. The Catholic (universal) Church as opposed to the offshoot, Protestantism and who holds sway. The Talmudists or not they? The same hand created and controls them both and that hand would have more in common with Gnosticism and perhaps Zoroastrianism than it would have us believe, and does it really matter who controls both?

It only matters who controls your OWN mind. You need no churches. Was it not Lenin that spoke of his adversaries and said that he would lead the opposition to the Bolsheviks from the front. Look around you ~ what see ye? Look at society, look at the symbols used in advertising,in "government" in fact everything and if you are discerning and sagacious they will tell you who is in charge ,and that also goes for your churches.


Mike said (August 29, 2012):


The debate here, while stimulating, can go on and on. It's also true what Azad said, that fossilized minds will defend their programing to the death. So maybe the whole subject can be viewed from a different magnification. -?

The old and new testements are generally put together in one book, and from the start of Christianity the God of the Jews was assumed to be a fact, his attitude forming the basis of spirituality. Unlike Jesus, who suggested loving your neighbor as yourself(non-duality), the God of the Jews extorted them to genocide and cruelty. - Is it possible that our own conflicted attitudes and collective conditioning have something to do with the belief in a God of tyranny, conditional love and dire threats?

I think it is inevitable that there is a world conspiracy by the Jewish tribe leaders and others, because it represents what is in the collective mind of mankind. It is The Matrix, formed by the beliefs and values and feelings of everyone. Most certainly it has been relatively easy for the Illuminati to manipulate great masses of people because of the common components of fear and greed and confusion. The Illuminati has played on the hubris of ego, confident in the superficiality of the general population, which gets mention in the first Protocol.

From its beginnings it seems that the Church has been about the disempowerment and control of the people, just like our governments and the NWO crowd. Contrast this with 'These things i do you will do too, and greater.' And really, no one was told that they should have to go to a synagogue or church, but rather the temple within.


Gene said (August 29, 2012):

The explanation is simple and has nothing to do with religious doctrine. The Roman Catholic Church had more gold than the Jews, the adherents to the religion of Judaism. Both religious organizations were really into the accumulation of as much gold as possible since both organizations considered gold the key to world domination. Real spirituality has nothing to do with gold which speaks volumes about the orientation of both organizations.


William said (August 29, 2012):

I enjoyed Tony Blizzard's follow-up. Anyone who doubts what he says should get it from the horse's mouth - Jewish Influence In Christian Reform Movements, by Rabbi Louis Newman, 1925. This is available on Amazon and also at Scribd.com. Another good source is Heinrich Graetz's History of the Jews.

Here is a good article on the subject: THE JUDAISING OF CHRISTIANS BY JEWS http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/the-judaising-of-christians-by-jews/


Azad said (August 29, 2012):

The controversy arising from Edward Hendrie's input has been a marvellous eye-opener to me. We are in the 21st century, awash with overabundance of information, freely available on the net, and yet so many are still shackled to their "programming". "Give me a child up to the age of seven and I'll show you the man" I. Loyola or F. Xavier or whoever made the comment, knew for sure what they were talking about. In the light of all the information you have made available on your website over the years, one would have expected far more of an open, accommodating mind from your readers than I have discovered.

People have been effectively brainwashed. Hook-line-and-sinker is the best way to sum it all up. No wonder people are manipulated so very easily. It proves again and again that, it is NOT up to "captives" to open up the eyes of their mind. Sincerely deceived fossilized minds will defend their programming to death if need be. He knew what He was talking about when He said: "Without me you can do nothing".


Jordan said (August 28, 2012):

I absolutely agree with JCW that we see the dialectic at work in the emotional rift between these, otherwise like-minded, monotheists. Something else that comes out is an interesting study of the psychology of people inclined to believe in a global conspiracy.

Your blog started as an honest discussion of the effects of institutional feminism and has expanded to many other facets of the globalist doctrine. Over time it has attracted people of many stripes who may agree that there is a conspiracy, but all the trappings of a religious debate manifest when the particulars of the conspiracy come up for discussion i.e., "Of course the ______ is Satanic, but how dare you slander my beloved ______!!" I'm sure it boils down to an emotional attachment to the first glimpse a person had of conspiracy that rang cognitively resonant. For some it may be Alex Jones grumbling about the globalists and making a connection between them and Nazi defectors, others may be stuck on David Icke giving us Reptilian Aliens, and for others it may be the Papist Vatican, the Sabbatean Jews, the Protestants, the dang Moooslem Mohammedans, the statists, the Robber Barons, the Commie Liberals, the Neocons, the Luciferians, the Cursed Hammites, Whitey etc. We all suffer from the fallibility inherent in humanity, and it helps me to view it comically in light of my own past errors in judgment. These discussions are doomed to end in temper tantrums and hurt feelings.

To briefly weigh in on the matter at hand. Since God first spoke heavenly words to the first Prophet, there has been worldly opposition to Divine Command. This happened every time a person/people/nation received prophetic dispensation. The Truth of One God, Prayer, Charity, the Day of Recompense, etc. is inherently simple and infinitely merciful and just, but it runs contrary to the inclinations of greedy, self-worshiping men who wish to enslave mankind. The earliest companions of Jesus would have been ideologically Unitarian since, “The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.[a] 30 Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’[b] 31 The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[c] There is no commandment greater than these.” The trouble begins to arise when we realize that Saul (later Paul) the Gnostic agent of the House of Herod commandeered the early church, and became it's most vocal proponent, drowning out the protests of those who actually accompanied the Messenger Jesus. From there, and until it's final codification at the Council of Nicaea, the Pauline doctrine of the Trinity, original sin, salvation through blood sacrifice and resurrection of God/Man incarnate etc established the Church as nothing more than a gentile Mithraic Mystery cult. To refer to either the Catholic or Protestant traditions as the Church of Jesus gives far too much credit to the validity of the codified books of the bible, the modern institutions, and the supposed ability to translate God's words across languages.

The solution to the above paradox for me (to which none of your readers will agree...) is Islam. The unchanged word of God to his final prophet and Messenger. See David Livingstone's books for more detailed analysis.


Carl said (August 28, 2012):

As a former Protestant and now Catholic, I would like add that if anyone bothers to study history and truly asks God for Faith (with sincere Humility), they will find the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC (universal) and APOSTOILC CHURCH. Make no mistake, a revolution initiated by the Devil has occurred within the visible structure of the Church (most vehemently since Vatican II), but as the Church is the ONLY Church founded by God the Son Himself… God, who knows all, will never change His mind about the necessity of membership within this Church for salvation. Jesus came to open Heaven and to supply the means to get there (i.e. the Church and Her Sacraments). To say that because there were evil men in powerful positions within the Church, who did un-Catholic things, and for this reason the Church is not the True Church is a non sequitur. Don't throw the "baby" out with the "bath water".
We are living in an era of "peace" materially. However, on the spiritual side it is WWIII, and has been especially since Vatican II. Don't let the devil fool you. We are not at "peace", and so many "Christian" sects and denominations (the worst of which, the Novus Ordo, calling itself Catholic) could NOT possibly please Our Lord Jesus Christ who said "..there shall be One Fold and One Shepherd". The Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Truth, cannot lie! How can the Holy Spirit possibly be present in the thousands of sects/denominations calling themselves "Christian"?


Why so many? Because the "spirit" is giving them all different interpretations of the "truth". This is NOT the Holy Spirit at work. Don't be fooled, "For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears."


Tim said (August 28, 2012):

It’s a great joy to me to find that someone like Tony Blizzard, who is not even a member of the Catholic Church, can see so clearly the two poles of the of the spiritual war that has being raging for 2000 years: the Catholic Church vs the Synagogue of Satan.

Yes, B’nai B’rith are perfectly correct to take the credit for the rise and continuing strength of Protestantism. It is yet another heresy set alight and fuelled by this perennial Jewish conspiracy, the first major one being that of their tool Arius in the 4th century.

The ecclesiastical infiltrators referred to in their 1936 Convention had successfully reached the upper echelons of power in the Church by the late 1950s. They staged a coup at the Papal Conclave of 1958. Refusing to accept the duly elected Genoese Cardinal Siri, they turned the Conclave into a Robber Conclave, electing the Rosicrucian Angelo Roncalli as their Antipope.

Roncalli’s main job was to call an Anti-Council (Vatican II) and bring the modernist Archbishop of Milan, Jean-Baptiste Montini, into the cardinalate so he could be elected as the next Antipope. Montini, himself of a noble Jewish family, was a genius in deception. He loved to wear the breastplate of the Jewish high priest.

Your readers will have heard of the Third Secret of Fatima, which Heaven had asked to be publicized by 1960 at the latest. Now we know why. It almost certainly warned of this clandestine takeover. And the document released in 2000 by the fake Catholics who run the Vatican is absolutely fraudulent, a blasphemous insult to the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Those who wish to know more about virile traditional Catholic teaching, as opposed to the neo-Protestant heresies emanating from the Judaeo-masonic Vatican II sect occupying Rome, could do worse than visit www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com.


Jake said (August 28, 2012):

Henry, I believe that many of these arguments about whether the Catholic Church or the various Protestant churches are the true keepers of Christ's teaching could be resolved by a broad, objective look at the writings of the earliest disciples of the the Apostles. These writings show decisively that the early Christians' prayer and worship was what we find in the Traditional Catholic doctrine and Mass. Though true history is almost always suppressed, if one is dedicated to knowing the truth, it cannot be hidden. I would recommend a good place to start would be:
Four Witnesses: The Early Church in Her Own Words by Rod Bennett

The Catholic Church's troubles with Judaism throughout the centuries is far too well documented to deny - except by those who refuse to look.


John said (August 28, 2012):

Some people get really angry when a harsh reality is delivered softly, without emphasis, and they end up with a bad result. So I'm going to lay this down in words everyone can understand. Every person is a rotten-trash sinner (result of the Fall) and Jesus is your only Savior. Jesus saves by His canonized (by the Council of Trent) Divine Liturgy. (His choice, not yours - "Unless you eat My flesh and drink My blood, you will not have eternal life" - priests are necessary) Outside of this true Divine Liturgy, you go to Hell ("not have eternal life"). This is the meaning of the teaching that outside the Catholic Church, there is no salvation. This is the main argument against Vatican II; in God's creation, you have no freedom to choose your religion. There is an exception, since the heart and spirit of God's law is love and They (Trinity) are not unjust. Invincible ignorance of the above is the excuse, but it is God's call, not yours. Do you want to take that chance? St. Pope Pius X declares our responsibility: "The greater part of those who are damned have brought the calamity upon themselves by ignorance of the mysteries of the Faith, which they should have known and believed, in order to be united to the elect." Our Lord said that not only those possessed by evil go to Hell but those who are lukewarm or frivolous. God wants total truth and total commitment; St Paul's "good race."


T said (August 28, 2012):

Tony Blizzards romanticised defense of the Catholic Institution shows lack of discrimination smacks of a blinkered view seen through rose coloured glasses as worn by Anglo-Saxon when they don't want to face the trail of carnage in history perpertrated by their ancestors...



http://arcticbeacon.com/books/Paris-The_Secret_History_of_Jesuits(1975).pdf


MS said (August 28, 2012):

The dispute between the Catholic and Protestant branches of the so-called "Christian" churches reveals to us yet one more tactic in the armoury of the anti-God forces: divide and conquer.

Only in God the Creator can we find reason and shelter. Not in any organisation of wealth-collecting, power-mongering institutions. Look at what Christ had to say about them. He called them a pit of vipers. He called them the Synagogue of Satan. But he wasn't just talking about Sanhedrin Jews. He was talking about anyone who puts their stored-up wealth up against spiritual riches.

This is just another example of the dialectic in play. Protestants against Catholics, Catholics against Protestants. Cui bono? Satan.

In my mind, the only way out of it is to pray to God directly for wisdom and guidance. You won't find either of those in a large supranational institution. Go deep within and pray to God from the roots of your being. Then you don't need a priest, and you don't need politics.

I would recommend that readers listen to Al Thompson in this matter. He isn't perfect in all his observations, but he does have a knack with the hammer.


Matt said (August 28, 2012):

One can not say the Catholic Church is innocent by any means. They have an obelisk in St. Peters square that was brought to Rome in Caligula in 37 A.D. Then moved to St. Peters square by Sixtus V in 1586. Also the pope's headdress no matter what pope derives from ancient Egypt, copied from the priest class at that time. Just recently the Vatican and Israel signed an economic agreement together. http://alternatenewsmedia2012.wordpress.com/2012/06/13/vatican-israel-to-sign-economic-agreement/


JCW said (August 28, 2012):

The last couple of articles have been interesting. Not because of the information provided but because of the reaction of your readers and commenter's. Everyone quote's facts and it is my guess that everyone is mostly right... We have the followers of Edward Hendrie and the followers of Tony Blizzard. The only knowledge of what I know about the Catholic Church is the little I have read over the years and what you have posted here.

We see the dialectic in action right here! The fusion created by these two articles could go on and on and probably get quite heated.

What if both writers are right? What if in the beginning (whatever that is) "Talmud ism" was this ubiquitous structure that was the basis for all government and religious systems and over time there was a falling away by those who seek God and those who seek liberty. In the process of time it became a hidden mechanism that was able to imprison those who simply settled for the status quo? Present day Talmud ism is hidden or "Occultic." It has become a barrier or the fence that corrals humanity into groups and forces them into a direction they are not aware they are going, but the end result is death, destruction, and slavery...

The path to God is not the direction that everyone else is going... The path to God is the direction that no one else is going.

So while we slug it out over our belief differences, those who are not imprisoned by such cares continue to remain hidden unhindered in the ability to control "Status Quo Humanity" or "Sheeple,"

I'm not accusing Henry Makow of anything sinister, I am just watching it unfold and it is interesting


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at