"September Clues" : 9-11 Truth is Limited Hangout
August 8, 2015
(Left. Photoshopped plane slices into steel girders like a knife through butter and comes out the other side undamaged.)
Simon Shack, who made "September Clues," believes the 9/11 TRUTH
MOVEMENT is a well-funded limited hangout. The leaders reveal certain aspects of
the attacks but hide the true events, of which video trickery played a key part. There
were no planes involved and possibly few passengers.
The CEO of the Loose Change company, a man named Joel S. Bachar, was associated with the Rockefeller Foundation.
Shack's latest version reveals that although about 200 passengers were expected from the three planes destined to Los Angeles, hardly anyone showed up to greet them, and the terminal was closed to cover up this fact.
The CEO of the Loose Change company, a man named Joel S. Bachar, was associated with the Rockefeller Foundation.
Shack's latest version reveals that although about 200 passengers were expected from the three planes destined to Los Angeles, hardly anyone showed up to greet them, and the terminal was closed to cover up this fact.
from April 16, 2012
by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)
The hit online film 'September Clues (2008)' is the most detailed and convincing exponent of the 'no planes' theory of 9/11.
The documentary is the work of Simon Shack, a seasoned video/audio engineer currently residing in Italy.
No commercial airliners were involved in 9/11. Missiles hit the towers and the planes were photo shopped. The amateur filmmakers and eyewitnesses were CIA plants.
The 'no plane' theory sounds absurd on first hearing, but if there were no planes in Pennsylvania, at WTC 7 and at the Pentagon, it would be consistent that no planes hit the WTC.
Shack believes there was a 17-second delay between the attacks and the screening of the footage, long enough for passenger planes to be inserted into the film. He reveals technical glitches and inconsistencies in the footage of the jets hitting the towers.
Various shots from both the TV footage and 'amateur cameramen' show United Airlines Flight 175 disappearing into the South structure like a ghost.
Another glitch is the infamous 'nose in nose out' shot, in which the Boeing penetrates the tower so perfectly that the nose of the plane emerges from other side unscathed. This is followed by a little blackout in footage in which Shack believes the perpetrators attempted to hide their mistake.
Bizarrely, different footage shows contradictory flight paths. One shows the plane dive-bombing into the tower, an impossible maneuver for a Boeing 767 (which cannot reach the reported speeds of 470 mph and 590 mph near sea level).
Audio was also faked. The same sample of a woman screaming is found on both an amateur film and TV footage. A fast reverse of the amateur video by 'Sarah Spell' reveals the shattering crash of impact to be a cymbal sample.
September Clues shows that the five major news channels had plants ready to act as eyewitnesses. Shortly after the attacks, all the big TV networks called up their own senior employees who reported seeing a commercial jet.
ABC News called up Mark Obenhaus, the producer of their hit show "Seeing is Believing". He reported, in a suspiciously calm and measured tone, 'the plane was completely engulfed by the building, it was extraordinary, no wings flew off, it just went directly in causing this cavern like hold in the building... It reminds you of the worst kind of effects in movies."
Considering that the CIA has always run the US media (Project Mockingbird), it shouldn't surprise that the TV networks were staffed with spooks ready to play their role. These are the people we rely on for information?
If a commercial jet didn't hit the towers, what did? Shack believes JASSM AGM-158 winged cruise missile is a likely candidate, as it resembles a small plane and only explodes after penetrating its target. The explosion of the missiles was timed to go off with bombs planted inside the towers.
But what about the passengers on the four planes? They were created by an "identity generating" software program that makes digital people with fictitious names. He encourages people to look into the 'CNN Victim Memorial' and check out the weak back-stories and fake appearances of the 'VicSims'.
This part doesn't stand up to analysis. The flight lists could not have been faked. On board AA Flight 11 was David Angell, the multi-Emmy award-winning producer of the sitcom Frasier. On AA board Flight 77 was Barbara Olson, a prominent Neocon and a regular talking head at Fox News. Unlike the supposed hijackers, the passengers have disappeared; how we don't know.
RECEPTION
September Clues has been a big hit; the most popular version on YouTube has nearly 200,000 views. By looking at the comments beneath the videos and praise for the film online, clearly many seasoned 9/11 researchers advocate the 'no plane' theory.
However, the film has received short shrift from the big names in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Alex Jones says the proponents of the 'no plane' theory are disinfo agents designed to make Truthers look clownish. He describes their followers as 'weak-minded' and 'mentally ill'. Dylan Avery (co-creator of 'Loose Change') refuses to allow anyone to discuss the film on the Loose Change forums.
For all their bluster, they do not refute the evidence in the film. Instead, they use smear tactics and relay dubious personal anecdotes (AJ claims friends from his college days were in NY on 9/11, and witnessed passenger planes). I have searched long and hard for a convincing debunking of the film, but I have yet to find one.
Simon Shack doesn't come across as a spook. For one thing, he doesn't receive the mainstream media attention afforded to Alex Jones and the Loose Change guys. On his website, septemberclues.info, he starts forums asking readers to debunk the various claims in the movie. For those who question his identity, he posts photographs of himself and his country home in Italy.
Shack believes that popular 9/11 Truth is a well-funded 'cover' movement. The leaders reveal certain aspects of the attacks but hide the true events, of which video trickery is a core part.
As evidence he notes the Loose Change website is run by a company named Microcinema International, which funded 'Loose Change: An American Coup' (2009). The CEO of the company, a man named Joel S. Bachar, previously worked for the Rockefeller Foundation. The Loose Change website 'Tech guy' is a man named Douglas Fraser, whose CV shows previous stints in various Military programs.
CONCLUSION
September Clues is essential viewing. The fact the passenger planes were Photoshopped reveals that 9/11 was to a large extent a purely televisual event, a mimicry of the disaster movies we are fed.
This may be shocking, but in military circles the idea of utilizing Hollywood effects for strategic gain is in common discussion. We live in a matrix and the Illuminati create our reality.
September Clues also does a pretty good job at filling in the rest of the story: the media talking heads were spooks, the passengers profiles were faked, a JASSM AGM-185 missile hit the towers etc.
Simon Shack admits he doesn't have a conclusive explanation for what happened on 9/11, but his thesis is probably the closest thing we have to date.
--
2007/05/why-they-didnt-use-planes-to-hit-wtc.html
New First Comment by Glen:
by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)
The hit online film 'September Clues (2008)' is the most detailed and convincing exponent of the 'no planes' theory of 9/11.
The documentary is the work of Simon Shack, a seasoned video/audio engineer currently residing in Italy.
No commercial airliners were involved in 9/11. Missiles hit the towers and the planes were photo shopped. The amateur filmmakers and eyewitnesses were CIA plants.
The 'no plane' theory sounds absurd on first hearing, but if there were no planes in Pennsylvania, at WTC 7 and at the Pentagon, it would be consistent that no planes hit the WTC.
Shack believes there was a 17-second delay between the attacks and the screening of the footage, long enough for passenger planes to be inserted into the film. He reveals technical glitches and inconsistencies in the footage of the jets hitting the towers.
Various shots from both the TV footage and 'amateur cameramen' show United Airlines Flight 175 disappearing into the South structure like a ghost.
Another glitch is the infamous 'nose in nose out' shot, in which the Boeing penetrates the tower so perfectly that the nose of the plane emerges from other side unscathed. This is followed by a little blackout in footage in which Shack believes the perpetrators attempted to hide their mistake.
Bizarrely, different footage shows contradictory flight paths. One shows the plane dive-bombing into the tower, an impossible maneuver for a Boeing 767 (which cannot reach the reported speeds of 470 mph and 590 mph near sea level).
Audio was also faked. The same sample of a woman screaming is found on both an amateur film and TV footage. A fast reverse of the amateur video by 'Sarah Spell' reveals the shattering crash of impact to be a cymbal sample.
September Clues shows that the five major news channels had plants ready to act as eyewitnesses. Shortly after the attacks, all the big TV networks called up their own senior employees who reported seeing a commercial jet.
ABC News called up Mark Obenhaus, the producer of their hit show "Seeing is Believing". He reported, in a suspiciously calm and measured tone, 'the plane was completely engulfed by the building, it was extraordinary, no wings flew off, it just went directly in causing this cavern like hold in the building... It reminds you of the worst kind of effects in movies."
Considering that the CIA has always run the US media (Project Mockingbird), it shouldn't surprise that the TV networks were staffed with spooks ready to play their role. These are the people we rely on for information?
If a commercial jet didn't hit the towers, what did? Shack believes JASSM AGM-158 winged cruise missile is a likely candidate, as it resembles a small plane and only explodes after penetrating its target. The explosion of the missiles was timed to go off with bombs planted inside the towers.
But what about the passengers on the four planes? They were created by an "identity generating" software program that makes digital people with fictitious names. He encourages people to look into the 'CNN Victim Memorial' and check out the weak back-stories and fake appearances of the 'VicSims'.
This part doesn't stand up to analysis. The flight lists could not have been faked. On board AA Flight 11 was David Angell, the multi-Emmy award-winning producer of the sitcom Frasier. On AA board Flight 77 was Barbara Olson, a prominent Neocon and a regular talking head at Fox News. Unlike the supposed hijackers, the passengers have disappeared; how we don't know.
RECEPTION
September Clues has been a big hit; the most popular version on YouTube has nearly 200,000 views. By looking at the comments beneath the videos and praise for the film online, clearly many seasoned 9/11 researchers advocate the 'no plane' theory.
However, the film has received short shrift from the big names in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Alex Jones says the proponents of the 'no plane' theory are disinfo agents designed to make Truthers look clownish. He describes their followers as 'weak-minded' and 'mentally ill'. Dylan Avery (co-creator of 'Loose Change') refuses to allow anyone to discuss the film on the Loose Change forums.
For all their bluster, they do not refute the evidence in the film. Instead, they use smear tactics and relay dubious personal anecdotes (AJ claims friends from his college days were in NY on 9/11, and witnessed passenger planes). I have searched long and hard for a convincing debunking of the film, but I have yet to find one.
Simon Shack doesn't come across as a spook. For one thing, he doesn't receive the mainstream media attention afforded to Alex Jones and the Loose Change guys. On his website, septemberclues.info, he starts forums asking readers to debunk the various claims in the movie. For those who question his identity, he posts photographs of himself and his country home in Italy.
Shack believes that popular 9/11 Truth is a well-funded 'cover' movement. The leaders reveal certain aspects of the attacks but hide the true events, of which video trickery is a core part.
As evidence he notes the Loose Change website is run by a company named Microcinema International, which funded 'Loose Change: An American Coup' (2009). The CEO of the company, a man named Joel S. Bachar, previously worked for the Rockefeller Foundation. The Loose Change website 'Tech guy' is a man named Douglas Fraser, whose CV shows previous stints in various Military programs.
CONCLUSION
September Clues is essential viewing. The fact the passenger planes were Photoshopped reveals that 9/11 was to a large extent a purely televisual event, a mimicry of the disaster movies we are fed.
This may be shocking, but in military circles the idea of utilizing Hollywood effects for strategic gain is in common discussion. We live in a matrix and the Illuminati create our reality.
September Clues also does a pretty good job at filling in the rest of the story: the media talking heads were spooks, the passengers profiles were faked, a JASSM AGM-185 missile hit the towers etc.
Simon Shack admits he doesn't have a conclusive explanation for what happened on 9/11, but his thesis is probably the closest thing we have to date.
--
Related:
Makow- Mass Media Collaborated in 9-11 Hoax
Tupac Hologram Performance - How Hard to fake Planes?
Fake flights/ passengers http://www.septemberclues.
Simon Shack on the 9/11 cover movement http://www.septemberclues.
New First Comment by Glen:
For anyone who has studied 9-11 in any detail, it eventually becomes quite clear that the perpetrators are behind most of the so called "9-11 truth groups". After all it was Vladimir Lenin who said "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." That is exactly what is being done with 9-11 truth.
What makes it hard to nail the truth about 9-11 is there was NEVER an investigation into it. It was a "firefighter 9-11 for truth" said "we investigate a dumpster fire more than we did 9-11". FDNY or NYPD never did an investigation which is mandated by law that they do.
So, what we end up with is the fairy tale that two planes flew into the towers and magically disappeared with really no debris other than the "magic passport". Controlled demolitions then went off and brought the towers to the ground. End of story, case closed. If you find fault with any of these theories you are labeled as bat shit crazy.
I would like to list a few anomalies about 9-11 that are never mentioned or outright hidden in most 9-11 truth sites. Here Goes.
1) The towers were each 110 stories high and weighed in at 1,500,000 tons. If they had been brought down by controlled demolitions alone the
debris field would have been somewhere around 14 stories high. Didn't happen.
debris field would have been somewhere around 14 stories high. Didn't happen.
2) Five firefighters survived the so called collapse of tower 2 in stairwell B. This is a video of one of the firefighters story. If the tower had simply collapsed these men would have been crushed to death.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stairwell+b+survivors&FORM=VIRE4#view=detail&mid=AF2BB185AB595714B7A1AF2BB185AB595714B7A1
3)There was a massive hurricane headed for NYC that morning which mysteriously made a hard right turn and headed out to sea. Here is the story of hurricane Erin.
http://www.federaljack.com/hurricane-erin-the-category-3-hurricane-that-should-have-prevented-911-from-happening/
4)No seismic footprint of the collapses, impossibility.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam2.html
3)There was a massive hurricane headed for NYC that morning which mysteriously made a hard right turn and headed out to sea. Here is the story of hurricane Erin.
http://www.federaljack.com/
4)No seismic footprint of the collapses, impossibility.
http://drjudywood.com/
These are just a few items that are never discussed as if they never happened. I have found when you are taking flak from both sides of the issue, you are more than likely over the 9-11 truth target. Dig a little deeper folks, there is more to the story than thermite.
George Writes:
I work at an oil refinery. In 20XX we had a catastrophic explosion that killed many people. We make jet fuel and the product that fuelled the explosion was very similar to jet fuel.
The quantity of fuel was far more than could be carried by any airplane. This equipment was fed by pumps that were at hundreds of pounds of pressure. After the explosion, the pumps continued delivering product until the Fire Brigade shut them off.
I was called the next day to retrieve security camera footage relating to the explosion. I also went to the accident site a couple of days later. One of my first thoughts was that despite the fire burning for hours, there was no damage to structural steel except the "I" beams that supported the heat exchangers. The force of the explosion bent these "I" beams but nothing was melted. As for other damage only the plastic insulation on wiring was burned off and aluminum sheeting and conduit was melted. Steel was not affected and copper wire was still hanging minus aluminum conduit and plastic insulation.
Whatever took the World Trade Center down was not a hydrocarbon based fire. I am more inclined to believe theories from Dr. Judy Wood and others saying directed energy, controlled demolition or nukes were used.
HM writes:
Another fact that A. Jones' boy J. Bermas, Gage and the other "enlightened" people refuse to mention ( aside from the obvious "dancing" Israeli connection among many others that Ryan Dawson explores well in his videos on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I , the fact that documents involving "disappearance" of trillions of Pentagon money - announced by Rumsfeld a day before http://www.oilempire.us/trillions.html - were exactly in that area of the building hit by whatever it was, the fact that Bin Ladens and Bushes were together in Washington in 9-11 http://www.prisonplanet.com/041203metwithbinladen.html etc.etc. ) is that after the first attack on the towers, they were reinforced by guess whom ? http://freemantv.com/twin-tower-demolition-wtc-architect-and-bin-laden/
It's so in your face it's ridiculous, but yeah the "mindfuck" ( incessant noise around the subject never touching it's core ) is indeed quite efficient. The Word, after all, rules the World - "in the beggining it was the Word". Not to mention that the masses are naturally attracted to fascination and "mystery", much more than to investigation, resolution and punishment - and if you can vaguely attribute it to a whole group of people ( 1.5 billion ) to feed the war hysteria and sick patriotism of dumbed-down sheep, so much the better.
PNAC needed a "new Pearl Harbor".
Michael said (August 15, 2015):
On Dave Richard's September Clues.." You sure know how to stir the pot up. Good article and good comments. So much said. My thoughts mostly to you as I don't think you need more posts. No planes were at the Pentagon or Shanksville, so if the towers were faked video feeds does not shock me at all. The bad guys controlling some Truther websites not surprising since " Satan himself disguises himself as an angel of light..." My thoughts have always been that understanding we were tricked (Radical Islamic terrorists the perpetrators)and that planes did not bring the towers down, is a launching pad to start peeling the onion apart. A real, honest investigation would uncover the real details of the crime, including Dr. Woods, Directed Free Energy evidence. So, for my part, that the bad guys may control and try to confuse facts of 9/11's exactly "how it was done" is not a big surprise, but just something to be aware of. And that awareness underscores another truth-just how dedicated these rats are to cover-ups, lies, and distortion.