Lori Douglas' "Defense" is a Disgrace
July 25, 2012
(l. Karen Busby, Professor of Law, University of Mantoba )
Manitoba's disgrace is compounded by Lori Douglas' lies, & feminists who defend the indefensible.
by Henry Makow Ph. D.
The Lori Douglas scandal disgraces the people of Manitoba, and discredits its justice system. The shame is compounded by Douglas' obvious lying and the Winnipeg Establishment's desire to condone her outrageous behavior.
Lori Douglas is not just any judge. She is the Chief Family Court Judge of Manitoba. Will anyone accept her judgments on marriage and child custody when the following pictures are on the Internet?
Justice Douglas lies on a bed, eyes closed, her hands shackled to the bed frame.
A topless Justice Douglas has a dog collar and chain around her neck.
Her Honor is urinating on the grass.
"Waiting for Black C**k." Justice Douglas performs fellatio on a man.
The Canadian Judicial Council is holding an inquiry on whether to dismiss her. She should have resigned long ago. She claims to be an innocent victim, that her husband, Jack King, betrayed her by putting these pics on the Internet.
In fact, she is still married to Jack King, left, which is proof of her complicity. He solicited a Black man, Alex Chapman to have kinky sex with her in 2003 and take pictures. She actually met Chapman twice and cooed over the size of his abs. Admittedly she wasn't a judge yet, but certainly this behavior disqualifies her.
"What do you think? Are you interested?" King asked Chapman in a May 8, 2003 email.
"I am making progress. She seems more interested at the moment in another woman + bondage, with her being the one tied up," King wrote.
"She suggested this evening... that you should be invited out here," King wrote three weeks later.
Are we supposed to believe King made this up? Douglas posed for the pictures. She knew they were online and she was willing to pose with Chapman until he decided to charge the couple with sexual harassment.
Douglas thinks she can keep her $250,000 sinecure because she is part of the corrupt and decadent Winnipeg Masonic establishment.
Douglas maintains that the facts "were well known in the legal community" and even by the judicial committee which appointed her -- right down to details about the nude photo which Douglas describes as graphic, explicit pictures including bondage.
"Even the Chief Justice of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench was aware of the issue and supported her bid to become a judge, the documents state."
"Senior members of the bench and bar made it clear to Ms. Douglas that her husband's conduct did not reflect negatively on her. She was urged by them to apply for judicial appointment," her lawyers say.
As this appears to be true, then the whole justice system is rotten and more heads should roll. Why were they so anxious to get Douglas to be a family court judge despite her known character and example? Was it because of their rush to appoint feminists? The Masonic political agenda is to corrupt society.
Douglas, (left) is compounding her crime by claiming to be an innocent victim. "The system of justice would be brought into disrepute if the victim of wrongdoing were punished," her lawyers state.
Give me a break!
Karen Busby is typical of feminist zealots who have reduced our "education" system to Illuminati (Communist) re-education centers.
This is what her students think of her, from "Rate Your Professor."
"She is terribly unfriendly, and more interested in her political agenda than anything else. Will quote "facts" not in the judgement to justify why the courts are wrong and she is right. Like many profs, if your conclusion is one she does not politically agree with, your mark will be lower as a result. Drier than dried mud in a dryer.""Worst Prof at Robson Hall. She brings her political views into the classroom and God help you if you don't agree. Hates students and hates life. Transfer out of Manitoba or go to the other section if you are going to have her!"
On Monday, she published a defense of Douglas, "Judge not lest ye be Spanked" in the Globe and Mail. In my opinion, it calls into question her fitness to teach.
She begins by complaining that this inquiry should not be taking place. She says that posing nude online is now commonplace:
"A 2008 U.S. survey found that one in five teens had electronically shared nude or semi-nude images of themselves and that almost 50 per cent of teens had participated in "sexting," the electronic sharing of sexualized images and texts."
We're not talking about teenagers. We're talking about a Family Court Judge.
"If Judge Douglas loses her place on the bench simply because someone distributed nude photos of her - after promising to destroy all paper and electronic copies - many leaders of tomorrow will live in fear that they could face the same fate."
Here, she is twisting the facts. Lori Douglas' husband posted the pictures, not Alex Chapman (left). Then Busby makes the case that bondage is mainstream and acceptable:
"Does it matter that these photos apparently show a judge in bondage gear? Research indicates that interest in bondage is higher than one might expect. A 1993 U.S. study found that 12.5 per cent of adults had engaged in sexual sado-masochism (S&M) at some time in their life. More recent studies indicate growing interest. A 1999 Canadian study found that 65 per cent of university students have fantasies of being tied up, whereas 62 per cent fantasize about tying up a partner. "
This is typical of how feminists mainstream decadence.
Satanism makes what is sick and deviant seem healthy and natural.
This is satanic worship, whether Busby knows it or not. Where true Christians might perform acts of charity, Satanists perform deviant sex & prey on children.
Conversely, Satanism makes what is healthy seem evil, as when Betty Friedan compared being a mother & housewife to an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp.
Busby is also a "gay rights" activist. Her argument continues:
"If S&M expressions are mainstream and ubiquitous, how can it be concluded that the integrity of the judiciary is undermined just because a judge, prior to appointment, permitted her spouse to take photos of her wearing bondage gear?"
I would wager that Karen Busby is not married, has no children, and may even be a lesbian. She doesn't understand that the debauchery of S & M is antithetical to healthy families. Families require monogamy, fidelity and love; S&M requires promiscuity and emotions very different from love. Children require parents who focus on their welfare, not on titillating themselves sexually.
I don't want Karen Busby training future family lawyers. I don't want Lori Douglas deciding the fate of Manitoba families. They remind me of the network of elite perverts that extends to Jerry Sandusky in Pennsylvania and to Nebraska, Portugal and Belgium.
The whole spectacle reeks of moral squalor and cowardice. The church is silent. The media makes excuses. Politicians hide.
Society indeed is satanically possessed. Sexual debauchery is the drug. The Illuminati, and their feminist and freemason shills, are the dealers.
Related - Lori Douglas Scandal Exposes Masonic Underground
Winnipeg Disgrace Now International - The Daily Mail Features Story
Jack King Tries to Save Wife's $250K Job
Is Manitoba Legislature a Disguised Pagan Temple?
Finally, some criticism of local Judges/Lawyers in Wpg Free Press
Comments for "Lori Douglas' "Defense" is a Disgrace "
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at