Ian said (March 10, 2015):

I would like to make two points if I may. The first is that the vast majority of "Holocaust Deniers", challenge only the existence of homicidal gas chambers, and a calculated extermination policy. That the "Holocaust" happened and many ordinary people died in the most terrible circumstances is not even up for question.

The second point I would like to make, is the absolute mockery this jailing and many more even in Scotland under the incitement laws, make of the Je Suis Charlie march in Paris. Theresa May with her Je Suis Jeuf placard, arm in arm with Europe's leaders along with Benny Netanyahoo, what an absolute cynical sham, in calling for freedom of expression.

AW said (March 10, 2015):

I am like you in that I can't stand the idea of making it a crime to question a historical event.
How ridiculous in a world where freedom of speech is considered the most sacred of human freedoms.

So apparently, it's "freedom of speech" when a Jewish/Christian Zionist denies the decades-old Palestinian holocaust (violating every human rights laws ever written), but it is a crime worthy of imprisonment to even QUESTION the official account of the Jewish holocaust.
Unbelievable hypocrisy!!!

Also, the International Zionist leaders who make it a crime to deny the Jewish holocaust are the SAME people who used their control of the media/academia to invent and promote the LIES that Palestine was an empty land when European Jews arrived in the early 20th century ("A people without a land for a land without a people") AND that the Palestinians are an invented people who only recently immigrated to the Holy Land when they discovered that Britain (and the United Nations) was planning to create a Jewish home land in Palestine.

Al Thompson said (March 9, 2015):

Whether one is a Jew or a goyim, they are never allowed to question the authority of the communist elite. The idea of rights granted by some constitution is complete bullshit. All anyone has to do is to attempt to exercise those rights and they'll find out very quickly that there is no such thing as rights granted by government. It is an abomination to the communist elite that anyone would actually think for themselves.

However, the fact that this lady claims to be a National Socialist is weird to say the least. Nazi's are still communists; the style is a bit different, but the substance is the same. If she advocates socialism, then she's getting the treatment she advocates. Socialism is socialism whether it is nationalist or something else. The various names is like putting lipstick on a pig; it's still a pig.

Communism, socialism, fascism are basically all the same thing and they are proven failures in providing benefits to the people at large. People have a natural right to speak what is on their minds. They don't need any constitution for any kind of authority. This lady didn't deserve to go to jail, but being a National Socialist, I think she set herself up for it.

No government is better than communism. Most nations have most if not all of the 10 planks of the communist manifesto in place. This type of government attracts nothing but vicious psychos just as a basketball team attracts tall men. The idiocy is inherent in the communist system. The more they screw up, the happier they are with themselves.

Forget about democracy as that is just two wolves and a sheep deciding who is going to be for dinner. In this case, the wolves ate the lamb.

Susan said (March 9, 2015):

I recently had a conversation with one of the produce employees at my local health food store. We were talking about rutabagas (Polish potato) and his recollection of his polish grandmother who still had her tattooed numbers from a Nazi internment camp in Poland. She was not Jewish, she was Catholic.

Sylvia Stolz is a very courageous person... no doubt about it. But the 'martyr for the cause' strategy is useless. She would be more effective if she was speaking out with her own website, lecturing in different countries and refusing to comply with this latest prison term. At some point you have to take a stand that will rock the status quo. At this point she needs to stop being a victim and strategize an international incident or some type of exit strategy that will will support her freedom thus her voice.

Robert K said (March 9, 2015):

It is a mystery how people can be subjected to legal penalties for discussing a historical issue for which there is no legal definition. The consequence is that defensive arguments are rendered impossible. As a lawyer friend once remarked to me, it's odd that in many countries the mere act of questioning one particular number can send you to prison.

Maybe TV host Larry King thought he was playing it safe when he asserted that the Holocaust killed not 6 million but, rather, 7 million Jewish people? Or might even this derogating from the apparently sacred number have landed him in trouble?

Holocaust, Holodomor, Nakba, Medz Yeghern, etc.--surely the detail of these events is critical to accurately understanding them?

KS said (March 9, 2015):

Thank you for this post Henry.

I agree with you that the issue here is her courageous defiance against a corrupt and arbitrary judicial process. The speech that earned her the present three and a half years gaol time can be seen here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLik_42avTM
This speech, (it is also linked at the top of the article) was delivered in Switzerland, not even in the prosecuting jurisdiction, and focused only on judicial procedures and definitions (or lack thereof). This time, she seems to have been severely punished for pointing out that here, the judicial process does not even have any internal logic. I ask readers to view the speech for themselves. I feel if we are to ignore this latest treatment of her and, 'pass by on the other side,' then it will be difficult to retain much self respect.

Patrick said (March 9, 2015):

"She said the court represented an occupational power that seeks the eradication of the German Nation" brings to mind the October 2012 article

http://www.henrymakow.com/is-canada-a-defacto-police-state.html

When Arthur Topham was imprisoned for bringing attention to the book written by a lunatic racist called "Germany Must Perish", calling for the complete EXTERMINATION of the German race, because according to the racist Jew who wrote it all Germans are genetically racist hate mongers (hence actual racist lunatics genociding them MUST be justified).

The implication is obvious. It is perfectly kosher for "jews" to publish a book calling for the genocide of an entire race off the face of the earth, but if anyone takes the same filth and replaces Germany with Israel they must be destroyed.

Reminds me of this 2014 article

http://henrymakow.com/2014/10/CMHR-disguised-holocaust-temple.html

By making WW2 about "the jews" instead of the humans betrayed by criminal monsters they enact what John Pilger calls "worthy deaths".

By brainwashing anyone who will listen about "the jews" and the "holocaust" 24/7, the implication that becomes reality is that "the jews" are worth remembering, and "the goyim" are not.

This is of course the exact philosophy of the Talmud and racist cowardly freaks like the one who wrote "Germany Must Perish".

How many weeks can pass without another "holocaust memorial" movie from the pedophile freaks of Hollywood?

How many movies have they ever made about the 60-100 MILLION Christians genocided in the Soviet Union?

Of course the insane freaks will never recognize their "worthiness" to be remembered, in their insane eyes the genocide of those Christians was great.

Pretending that a "jew" dying is somehow worse than a human who is not a "jew" dying is racism and racial/cult supremacism. Pure and simple.