Direct Link to Latest News


Events Prove Protocols of Zion Authentic

May 29, 2019

(Is it a coincidence that these professors look Jewish and are reading Marx?)

There is a direct link between the plans outlined 
over 100 years ago in the Protocols of Zion 
and the destruction of higher learning 

and religion in the West today.

This is the fourth and final part (16-24) in a Synopsis 

of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Introduction and Part One (1-4) is here.  

Part Two (5-11) and Part Three (12-15)

This is required reading to understand the world in which we live. The Protocols exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them. The Protocols were part of an "initiation" for 33 degree Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. "Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren." (Protocol 9)

from July 12, 2017


Protocol 16 -- Subvert Education and Religion.

 "We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order. But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education and shall make out of the youth obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet." 

[Cf. Protocol Two- "Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzchism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim."] 

gender bender.jpg

"We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the goyim." 

"We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction... teachers will read what will pass as free lectures... These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith as a transitional stage towards our faith." 

"We shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use the last scintilla of independence of thought... [we will] turn the goyim into unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them." 

"We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth, which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us... As to other religions, we shall still have less difficulty in dealing with them..." (Thinking sexual abuse by Catholic priests?) 

"The king of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the Patriarch of an international Church." "...we shall fight against [existing churches] by criticism designed to cause schism..." (Thinking gay marriage?) 


"In our programme, one third of our subjects will keep the rest under observation from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the state." 

"Just as nowadays our brethren [i.e. Jews] are obliged at their own risk to denounce to the kahal [Jewish council] apostates of their own family... so in our kingdom over all the world it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of service to the State..." (Thinking KGB, Stazi or Gestapo?) 

Protocol 18 - frequent attempts upon the lives of goy leaders through our agents

"...we have broken the prestige of the goy kings by frequent attempts upon their lives through our agents, blind sheep of our flock, who are easily moved by a few liberal phrases to crimes provided only they be painted in political colors. We have compelled the rulers to acknowledge their weakness in advertising overt measures of secret defence and therefore we shall bring authority to destruction." 

alexanderII (1).jpg

[For example, left, Czar Alexander II was assassinated by a bomb in 1881. The Minister of Internal Affairs von Plehve was assassinated in July 1904. Peter Stolypin, the Prime Minister was assassinated in September 1911.] 

Protocol 20 - "The purely brute brain of the goyim..."

This deals with the "financial programme" the "crowning and decisive point of our plans." The author's expertise in these matters suggests he is a banker. "When we come into our kingdom our autocratic kingdom will avoid... burdening the masses with taxes remembering that it plays the part of father and protector." 

A progressive capital tax will be introduced. "A tax increasing in the percentage of ratio to capital will give a much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the goyim." 


"Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation." "The issue of money ought to correspond with the growth of population..." 

"The gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible." 

Goy governments can create their own currency and credit. "How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the goyim as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us... without ever thinking that these very moneys, plus an addition for payment of interest, must be got by them from their own state pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been more simple than to take the money they wanted from their own people?"

 Protocol 22 -


"In our hands is the greatest power of our day--gold... Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true well-being--the bringing of everything into order?" 

"Our Order will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee and a reverent fear before it of all peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span away from it." 

Protocols 23-24 


The "King of the Jews" dynastic heir of King David will be King of the world. He will replace all existing rulers. Otherwise, the Protocols end on a curiously benign note, promising a benevolent government that ensures peace and order in exchange for total submission. 

There are many nostrums like: "Unemployment is a most perilous thing for a government. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness will also be prohibited by law..." 

"The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions... the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations. Our supreme lord must be of exemplary irreproachability." "Signed by the representatives of Zion, of the 33rd degree." 


Related- The Protocols are describing the Communist Conspiracy. Watch KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov say in 1985 it has worked beyond their wildest expectations. He said America was in "a state of war" against Communist subversion and didn't realize it.

------------ Maurice Joly Plagiarized Protocols (not vice-versa) 

------------Protocols Plagiarism Argument is Flawed 

------------ How Universities Betray Students 

-----------------  Jewish Overrepresentation at Elite Universities 

E. Michael Jones  Goy Guide to World History 

------------------- Jewish Agents of Chaos

First Comment from James Perloff-


Thanks for republishing these excerpts over the past days. Nothing is closer to the NWO's blueprint than the Protocols. They never get old, even after more than a century, and I don't think a single protocol has ever been falsified. In my own study, it was the reference to Darwinism that first caught my attention; the references to presidential orders overriding constitutions and the use of sports to distract the masses were among those that most moved me toward accepting their authenticity; and the reference to vaccination ("inoculation of diseases") sealed the deal for me. 


These are comments to YouTube video "Goy Guide" which I found articulate and germane-

When the sheenies did 911, MH370 and MH17 this is what they also did-- (1) Expired their holocaust free pass and honorary white status (2) Proved to the World that Jewry is a psychopathic criminal organization disguised as a religion (3) Proved to the World that America is a militarist junta banana republic and a colonial possession of Israel.

With the triumph of Jewry comes the subjugation and enslavement of the entire non-Jewish world. Christianity becomes the first casualty, the family unit the second... Homosexuality and radical feminism become more strident in their attitudes and more extreme in their demands, opening up a Pandora's box of evils: the push to normalize pedophilia, for example, and the systematic corruption of children through the promotion of child porn in the classroom...

We are in a critical situation... It was never Palestine on its own that organized Jewry wanted. Palestine was simply to be their base of operations for the conquest of the rest of the world... According to Israel Shamir: "Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is. Palestine is just the place for world state headquarters. The Jews intend to turn Jerusalem into the supreme capital of the world, and its rebuilt temple into the focal point of the Spirit on Earth. Christianity will die, the spirit will depart from the nations in our part of the world, and our present dubious democracy will be supplanted by a vast theocratic state. De-spiritualized and uprooted, homeless and lonely, yesterday's Masters of the World [WASPs] will become slaves in all but name...."

The Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary people have worsened... A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind...The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are "good for Jews" are rarely good for anybody else...

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Events Prove Protocols of Zion Authentic"

Christine said (June 4, 2019):

Yes, they are doubtless authentic.

However, the authors weren't really the "Jews": The true authors were demonic spirits.

The evil figs of Jeremiah 24 are just the sadly deluded minions of Satan.

(We shouldn't use the term "Jew" when speaking of the evil figs. True Jews (the good figs) were loyal to God, accepted Jesus Christ, and took the gospel to the world. Someone who describes themself as a Jew but who denies Jesus Christ is a member of the synagogue of Satan)

Tony B said (May 29, 2019):

The date "1968" as the beginning of really serious Jewish control, in the last paragraph, hit home for me. As Paquita de Shishmareff (L. Fry of "Waters Flowing Eastward," definitive exposé of the protocols) often informed me as a youth, the only thing in the world that held back Talmudic communism at all was the still Catholic members of the Catholic Church. By 1968, the satanic/Jewish/Masonic takeover of the Vatican was in full and active action destroying from the inside of the Church everything Catholic, everything Godly and spiritual, in it. Man's last defence against satanic degeneracy in its myriad of forms.

Simon said (July 13, 2017):

Thanks for providing these texts and your take on it. There's not a doubt that the contents of the Protocols fit like hand in glove to what has happened the last century up till this day. However, I would suggest readers interested in the origins of the Protocols to also consider Miles Mathis' interesting analysis:
Not disputing the truth of the content of the texts, Miles convincingly demonstrates that the text is likely a political feint written by insiders of the aristocratic class, exposing the Cabal and their schemes, while hinting at the benignness of the aristocracy. See for example Protocol 1.26:
As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.

Same goes for the Protocols scape-goating the Jews, thereby mystifying the (Gentile) aristrocracy's own intents and schemes, which are not that far off from those of the (mostly Gentile) Cabalist bankers they're trying to expose.

Thanks Simon

But people have been brainwashed into denying the obvious, that the Protocols are genuine and were not written to scapegoat Jews. Communism is and was Jewish.


Francis said (July 13, 2017):

As I often say, the Protocols are not exactly a fraud or a canard : they are a novel, compiled by a Russian conservative writer who sincerely foresaw what he thought could happen in the near future, basing himself partly on works written by French novelists, partly also on intuitions and visions of lesser known village Russian mystics as the country used to be exceptionally rife with. That conservative Russian writer, most probably an ecclesiastic of high rank working for the Tsar’s secret police, sincerely believed in what he wrote and took what he thought the best way to alert the common people about the real intentions of the revolutionaries that were trying to seduce them into riotous behaviour and violent political actions. Unfortunately the guy was somewhat less inspired than Jules Verne was and would write down only what he was rationally certain had been happening and described by several other conspiracy writers selling their predictions as fiction, one of them being Eugène Sue, another one being Joly, another one being Darien. That Russian author had a good (and justified, given the horror that USSR would be) intention, but he was neither an eye witness of any real proceeding among Jews of high decisional rank, neither a seer. But he had erudition in the matter and counted on other authors he deemed competent as seers, though he would not take the pains to send spies at Basel : he would on the other hand rather see his views confirmed by the sayings of some prideful Jews arrested for their financial scams or revolutionary activities, who could indulge in such fancies as described by the Protocols. The Protocols are clearly neither a work of direct police investigation into real Jewish decisional gatherings : the real Jews who love to entertain such schemes speak in a very different way, actually a far more pervert one, as people who would believe in their own lies by expressing themselves in words of compassion for the people they manipulate shamelessly ; they are even less an inspired work of prophecy.

Noam Chomsky is among the real perverts that could easily compose such a decisional instance : he seems to be full of compassion for the victims of the Zionist order of things but each time he utters a word you feel more and more powerless before a strange fatality preventing any one to make to the right move. Actually, the mental paralysis he induces is willed and calculated. When Jews congregate to distort the whole world to their own interests, they always speak as if a strange fatality were compelling them to act the way they act, and as if their own wars were all defensive at worst. Therefore we can conclude the Protocols never were the real minutes of any decision-making gathering of elders : they speak more like goy, Italian-style bandits than like people into the Kabbalah.


Thanks Francis

We totally disagree. After seeing the ravages of Communism, and the 20 century in general, I am shocked that smart people can't recognize what is before their eyes.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at