Direct Link to Latest News


Contempt for Lawyers Causing Boycott?

February 10, 2013


"Breaking Bad's" Saul Goodman (played by Bob Odenkirk).


Public revulsion against lawyers has grown to the point where the justice system is endangered.  



"The law is an elite culture of privilege that has gone awry, utterly blind to its own weaknesses and its own propensity to cause harm. "



What's the difference between a mosquito and a lawyer?

One is a blood-sucking parasite; the other is an insect.


What's the problem with lawyer jokes?

Lawyers don't think they're funny, and no one else thinks they're jokes.


by Henry Makow Ph.D.


Public contempt for lawyers is reaching the point where an informal boycott seems to have started in Canada and the USA.  

"I am not so much afraid of being the victim of a crime," a Canadian recently wrote recently. 

"My fear is being the victim of the most slow, inefficient, expensive, absurd, complicated and unjust bureaucracy ever invented by any country anywhere - the Canadian legal system."

The comment was in response to an announcement Thursday that the 18,000-member Ontario Bar Association is launching a campaign to persuade people that, far from parasites, lawyers are "actually problem-solvers, pillars of their communities and an indispensable cog in a healthy democracy."




The news was greeted  by almost unanimous scorn by the 77 people who bothered to comment: 


"Don't worry Ontario Law Society. It's just 95% of the lawyers that give the rest a bad name!"

"The image of lawyers as lower than toads fits perfectly. These dirt bags would sell their mothers for a profit."

"If a child of mine brought a lawyer home as a potential spouse; that child would be out the door." 

 "A substantial chunk of them are self-serving manipulative ambulance-chasers utterly devoid of a moral or ethical compass."
"They are regarded by society on the level of pedophiles and murderers."
 A Coroner with 30 years experience wrote:
 "Lawyers ... charge ruinous fees for their services and often do more harm than good. Often I have assessed people in court cases who have been financially ruined while their lawyer grew obscenely rich. The law is an elite culture of privilege that has gone awry, utterly blind to its own weaknesses and its own propensity to cause harm."
The result is that many people are not seeking justice in the Courts. Those that do attempt to self-represent. There are fewer jobs for graduating law students. Law is no longer the secure path to success it once was.
I' m sure everyone has their own mostly bad experiences with lawyers.  I will spare you mine. Instead, I will relate the recent story of a single mother I know. She supports her children doing menial labor. I'll call her Clara. 
She was in a six-year custody battle with her ex that involved money he took.

Three "Legal Aid" lawyers in succession did nothing for her. Finally she found a competent lawyer who said he would work "pro bono." 
He eventually won the custody battle and extracted  $28,000 that her ex owed. 
Of this amount, the Legal Aid lawyers, who only obstructed the process, claimed $17,000. The "pro bono" lawyer decided to take about $7,000 after all. Clara ended up with about $4,000. 
Clearly the "client" is only incidental to a process by which lawyers exploit conflicts to line their own pockets. Clara thinks it absurd that the father was convicted of "failing to provide" for his children; and then the lawyers took their money.
People are quick to jump on instances of corruption but loathe to consider the possibility that much of it might be traced to a single source: Freemasonry. 
STATUE6.jpg(left, statue of policewoman completing a pyramid in front of Toronto Police HQ on College Ave.)

The Illuminati Jewish central bankers control society through organized Jewry and a vast Masonic network that includes control of professional associations like psychiatry (see #39.)   They infiltrate government, business, the church, the mass media, education and every important social institution. 

Anecdotal evidence suggests that Masons also have a stranglehold over the police and the administration of law.   
In his 1983 book, "The Brotherhood" Stephen Knight cited a British Mason who said it was standard practice to entangle their enemies in the legal challenges and thereby destroy them financially. In a sense, the degradation of the system of justice might be regarded as an extension of this -- a broad secret war against society as a whole. 
Readers of this website don't need to be reminded how the law has been used to destroy husbands and fathers, part of a wider Masonic political agenda to destroy the family.
The Chief Family Court Judge in Manitoba may have got her job because she appeared naked in porn pictures on the Internet. Thus she, and judges like her, would be easy to blackmail, and willing to hand down the egregious judgments that destroy families and put children in danger. 
Her accuser, Alex Chapman cannot find one lawyer in Winnipeg to represent him.  One laughed in his face when Chapman used the word, "Justice." Indeed ,the whole Masonic-controlled elite of Winnipeg has rallied around Douglas.     
In BC, Eva Sydel cannot get judges hearing her case to admit they are Masons.   Masons take a vow to help their "brothers" at the expense of justice. How can these people serve as judges?  Here is her website.


Communism is the total political, economic and cultural monopoly over the world by the Cabalist Jewish central bankers using the "State" as a Front.

Illuminati insider Christian Rakowsky said the goal of Freemasonry is Communism.  

It follows therefore that the gradual breakdown of public faith in the justice system is part of the satanic tyranny known as the New World Order.

The first job of government is to ensure that the country isn't taken over by a satanic cult. Apparently our governments were not up to this task.

So when you're $400-per-hour lawyer won't return your phone calls, there might be more happening than you think: Many are out to screw you, and society as a whole.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Contempt for Lawyers Causing Boycott? "

Tony B said (February 11, 2013):

The general thinking on lawyers is much too narrow. At least in the English speaking world, the actual reasons that lawyers are all about legal or lawful with no room and no time for what is truthful, ethical, just or moral goes back to the beginning of Jewish Protestantism.

Before Protestantism were such advances in fairness to all as Magna Charta with juries of the accused's peers (under the true definition of the word, i.e, those who knew the person well, NOT those of title).

But, since Protestantism (which replaced God's rule by that of the whims of man, the true description of "liberalism") was and is a negation of Christianity under the guise of updating Christianity, the Christian system of law has, from the inception of its rule by man or man's government rather than God, become the brutal rule of those worst of men who have grabbed this power for their own worldly profit, the only thing that really matters under Jewish Protestantism.

Those in the English speaking world, from where most of the evils in today's world emanate, who would right such wrongs must return that world to real and true Christianity and the days of government beholden to God's laws instead of the farce of "self government" used by the devil to control all under his agents who seem to have mushroomed in number in these latter days.

First priority in fruitfully accomplishing this hard and harsh task is to destroy the now violently criminal money system of private debt bank credit and establish an honest, government-created, at no cost to the public, medium of exchange. Such a change alone would cause most of the other political, social, economic and spiritual diseases of the "West" to dry up and blow away in a very short time due to a lack of financing by the demise of the evil cabal at the heart of dishonest money and its satanic uses. This would tend to hasten the return to true obedience to God's commands in government, religion, economics and social life.

M said (February 11, 2013):

I believe by blaming lawyers and freemasonry for our woes we are giving them too much power. Although, I do believe these two entities are evil and sleazy, they are not the root source of our problems. It is truly our own ignorance and our own refusal to prioritize bringing down these evil institutions that is the source of our weakness. The lawyers, the Freemasons, the kabalists, etc. are constantly working and meeting and doing things to manipulate and control the average man. Meanwhile, the average man does nothing to counter this. Most people don't realize these institutions are a problem until after they've been struck and by then it is too late.

Your website does a nice job chronicling the actions of Zionists and company but you don't really offer up any corrective action for the average man. Stating the problem is a good first step but there has be a second step of stating the solution.

I for one believe that the first step for those of us who are against the NWO is to start forming small secret organizations of our own. Aggressive but non-violent, small (2 to 12 in number) but effective where goal would be to dismantle the police state infrastructure. Dismantle the police departments, the public schools, the mainstream media, etc.

When good men do nothing evil prospers. No one man has to be a hero or a superman. But if enough of us start taking one small action everyday we could be like a million fire ants taking down an elephant one tiny bite at a time. Each small group would be independent being loyal only to the mission and not to any one man.

When a group grows to 13 men it shall split into two separate, independent groups. In this way when the government attacks a group they only take down one small group when there are thousands of small groups. This is just the rough plan for reclaiming freedom that I've come up with. Your thoughts?


It is one thing to diagnose the sickness, quite another to cure it when it has reached the state it has. But if we regard each individual as a cell, just knowing the body is cancerous is enough for that cell to escape the sickness. Obviously we need to reaffirm the 4 things they want to destroy: Religion (God); Nation; Race and Family (gender.) This is as much as I have to contribute. I leave it for you and others to take further action if you can. Your idea sounds as good as any I have heard.


Joe said (February 11, 2013):

Everyone has probably already heard the three reasons why lawyers are being used to replace laboratory rats:

1. They are more plentiful.
2. You can get attached to a rat.
3. There are some things a rat just won't do.

For anyone interested in representing himself in court, might I suggest "The Underground Lawyer," plus any documentation regarding "pro se" representation. A legally savvy citizen knowing just as much and possibly more than any judge or attorney regarding a specific aspect of the law or regulation can have the effect of "diamond bullets" in a courtroom.

Something else to keep in mind, an attorney's job is not justice, nor is it a crusade to uncover the truth of any matter. An attorney's sole reason for breathing is to win arguments disregarding truth, justice or who is right about an issue. It all comes down to who can yell the loudest and convince the most people (usually more than six) that the case should be found in their favor.

I have seen an attorney go on the attack and in doing so, slander a defendant while misrepresenting the facts of the case while presenting his "bona fides" as if he were some authority to be admired and feared. But when attacked, this attorney turns into a sniveling victim charging his attacker(s) with the very characteristics he himself is guilty.

Engaging in legal "combat" with an attorney can be like battling Satan himself with all the shifting around from "shark" to "guppy" and back again. It's all about winning arguments, nothing about justice or truth.

Peter said (February 11, 2013):

Mason have the Judiciary fully stitched up.
I had my arm broken in the middle of a public street by a thug mason, one of the "unworthy craftsmen" the movement finds so useful these

Despite convictions for violence and firearms offenses at the Winchester Crown Court The sole masonic stipendiary magistrate sitting
alone declared that i was unable to enter the record of his previous violence into the case for which i was the defendant courtesy of his
soon to be promoted to sargent police constable friend.

Come the day of the trial the same sole mason heard the case on his own and found me guilty.
Strangely half way through he "went off on one"and started rambling a whole lot of weird meaningless drivel obviously designed to appeal to
the gathering of masons present very little of it made any sense to me but the brothers must have been lapping it up.

so yes lawyers are bent and i have for a long while now boycotted them.

Debra said (February 11, 2013):

Many lawyers have been fooled like others who began careers thinking they were going to help people then discovered the opposite. Sure,
they may help every now and then, but that is built-in to string them and everyone else along. If they begin to do the right thing and
defend people Lawfully, they are likely to be disbarred from the B.A.R. which is "who" they are really working for. Lawyers are between a rock and a hard place. They work for evil people in very high-places. Sad, but true. I read something recently and thought it might be helpful to share:-

"The Law by Frederic Bastiat"

Judy said (February 11, 2013):

Henry ~ this article about lawyers hits the nail fair and square on the head. We have lived it and I never ever want to have anything to do with any of them again. We tried to help our son whose wife left him and took everything after a nine month adulterous affair in secret. He was devastated and broke. To help him we paid a lying lawyer who told us he would fight for custody of the two boys. This changed as soon as he got with the other lawyer and all we got for the $3,000 up front was the same as we would have gotten without any lawyer at all. I complained to the Bar Assn which does no good. They are equally as bad here in the US as in Canada. Look at Congress and the Senate for example.

Robert said (February 11, 2013):

Every lawyer graduates from law school (or at least used to) with knowledge of the centuries-old importance of habeas corpus in our history and to our personal security. Yet its effective abolition in the USA on the pretext of fighting terrorism has hardly elicited a whisper of protest from the enormous legal community in that country. It
appears to be a community in which venality has triumphed completely over principle and concern for institutional integrity.

Al Thompson said (February 11, 2013):

Lawyers behave like pimps, whores, and sluts. The most foul of the lawyers are the ones who work for the "government". I recommend that your readers look at this link and listen to an exchange between Marc Stevens and "Kimberly Clark" of the Internal Revenue Service.

This nonsense goes on almost every day and there is no sane way of working with these people other than to avoid them at all cost. As you listen to this tape, you'll understand why even Jesus Christ attacked them. Truly, these are the real psychopaths. Lawyer joke: You know why sharks don't attack lawyers? Out of professional courtesy.

I personally have had interviews with IRS that sounded similar to this.

Marc Stevens is a man who is a legal consultant that can do a lot to help people limit the damage lawyers. But once you hire a lawyer, you're basically screwed. You will lose your case, all your finances, and end up in prison. Marc's website is at

Mike said (February 10, 2013):


Take a look here. They seem to have real, viable solutions to the legal system and Gov control systems nonsense.

If nothing else, read this. Yikes.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at