Direct Link to Latest News


Is Misogyny a Cure for Woman Worship ?

May 20, 2017

(left, Arthur Schopenhauer, 1788-1860)

"Misogyny is the key to male liberation from blue pill delusions. Only by embracing it, can men adopt a new paradigm in which the female of the human species has forever been knocked off the pedestal that had been erected in our minds by institutionalized brainwashing and mass media programming." So said an 
informed reader when this was first posted in 2012. Do you agree?

The Illuminati have empowered women in order to emasculate men. In his classic essay, "Of Women"  (1851) German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) provided an antidote which, although not true of all women*, still applies to many.

"The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is 28; woman when she is 18"

from July 22, 2012
 by  Arthur Schopenhauer
(Edited by

"One need only look at a woman's shape to discover that she is not intended for either too much mental or too much physical work. She pays the debt of life not by what she does but by what she suffers--by the pains of child-bearing, care for the child, and by subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion.

The greatest sorrows and joys or great exhibition of strength are not assigned to her; her life should flow more quietly, more gently, and less obtrusively than man's, without her being essentially happier or unhappier.

Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted--in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word.

Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.

With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a "striking effect," for she endows them for a few years with a richness of beauty and a fulness of charm at the expense of the rest of their lives; so that they may during these years ensnare the fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honorable care of them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime--a step which would not seem sufficiently justified if he only considered the matter.

Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as she has the rest of her creatures, with the weapons and implements necessary for the protection of her existence ... Nature has proceeded here with her usual economy.

Just as the female ant after coitus loses her wings, which then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding purposes, so for the most part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or two children; and probably for the same reasons.


The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations.

This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important.

It is by virtue of man's reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them.

Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less degree than men...


 So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no "sense of justice."

This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie.

For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defense with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form.

Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights.

Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them.

From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on.

In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all.

* Some of the most effective opponents of the NWO have been women: Edith Starr Miller, (Lady Queensborough,) Elizabeth Dilling, Nesta Webster, Olivia O'Grady and Judith Reisman are examples.

Related- Makow -The Occult Plot to Idealize Women
--------------------- Overrated- Sex & Romantic Love

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Is Misogyny a Cure for Woman Worship ? "

Robert M said (May 21, 2017):

Schopenhauer seems to have had issues with women. What I would love to see is a recovery of what my parents' (World War ll) generation had; men-women relationships successfully based on mutual respect of each gender for the other, realistic acceptance and acknowledgement of the foibles of both your own gender and that of your spouse, and bemused, mature, adult tolerance of those foibles. (An example of the TRUE definition of tolerance.)

Of course, this was before the mass media we have today and the re-engineering of society that has been implemented through it. Misogyny is not the answer so much as men regaining their sense of self-worth, and once again valuing masculine virtues. The modern, all-pervasive media is a propaganda tool. What it projects often has little relation to reality. As far as I'm concerned, western civilization cannot be saved until the media's power is broken.

Marco said (May 21, 2017):

There is a proverb that I think does a better job at solving this issue;

"The mission of the man in life is to protect the woman so that she can walk the Earth free.
The mission of the woman is to unite the man with his soul."

Feminism is obviously poisonous and false... but so is any ideology that uses a 'traditionalist' veneer to hide it's contempt and fear of the fairer sex.

Dave B said (May 20, 2017):

Hockey wives TV show is a great way to get into how women think.

These bottle-blonds are so stupid that they cannot hide their cunning ways from the camera.

Their almost cookie cuttings of each other. No fatties. No blue haired tattooed nose ring slobs...But they are each as obvious self-centred as the others.

Sadly, it would have most likely made no different if they married one hockey groupie over the next.

In the end they are such witches. If you've never watched the show..I suggest that every guy watch this show to see the true nature of women

MG said (May 20, 2017):

How I see it this issue isn't about who's smarter or better; both woman and men have their strengths and weaknesses ... the bottom line is God ordained the man to be the leader and protector of the woman and their offspring and he knows whats best. As long as men act the way God ordained them to act and woman act the way God ordained them to act society is healthy when that stops society starts to rot.

Karen said (May 20, 2017):

Really. The Schopenhauer article shows Schopenhauer to be very one sided and cornered.

Perhaps you would do better to follow Arturo Perez-Reverte who isn't afraid of strong women. This is what he has learned of women:

She is totally a fictional character. To forge her character, I used what I recall about women. Women are much more lucid and much more valiant than men. In times of crisis, women have certain reserves of moral strength which are far more superior to those of men. I saw that both in times of war and in times of peace. So we could say that, in order to build the character of Teresa Mendoza, I used everything I learned about women in an entire lifetime.

Now this is a man who knows women.

Cliff Shackananda said (July 23, 2012):

Cabalists are not alone in using thought Magick to create delusion. We take ourselves to be "I." Is not "I" but a mere idea like any other. Is the thinker that we take ourselves to be any more than the I-thought? The thought "I" is the most magical thought. It is the primal thought. It also brings life's greatest delusion. The delusion of individuality. The delusion of separateness. This delusion is the foundation of true madness. It is the true root of evil. The one ill that Christ sought to cure. A delusion that even the best of us are still quite comfortable with.

The thought "I" is to us like a ring in the snout of a pig. Unable to free ourselves from this delusion, and it IS a delusion, the Illuminati lead is by this nose-ring. How so? Once the thought "I" arises, it automatically identifies itself as an individual body. Bodies have needs and desires. The Illuminati have placed themselves between bodily desires and bodily fulfillment. The cycle will continue until the spell is broken.

Luckily for the Illuminati, the ruse is self-perpetuating. New bodies are born and old bodies foist the delusion upon them. Infants are given names. They are told that they are boys or girls. They are given a race and a nationality. Naive and innocent they assume their newly acquired identifications to be so. When able to speak they utter to the glee of the questioner, "I am so and so." "I am this or that." The ring is secured for life in most cases.

Fiona said (July 23, 2012):

NO gender should attack, or humiliate, or lord it over, the opposite one. Men and women are both capable of thought.

Depends on the person, not the gender. Celebrate the obvious differences between the sexes, sure - but don't make differences where none exist.

Gender has nothing to do with intelligence, or compassion, or tolerance, or love; any more than race or religion does. We're all human.

And while it is human to look for the differences between us, and to then say, 'Mine's better!' - it's not the way to happiness. You miss out on so much; on so many people. (half the human race, in this case)



Reread the title - Antidote to Women Worship --
Obviously realism is needed.


Joe said (July 23, 2012):

The nature of woman is to Love Children? With Millions of abortions being performed every year, Female babies being killed at birth , Millions of other women not wanting families.

This is no longer true in the age we live in . Maybe there was a time when this was true.

Lynn said (July 23, 2012):

Both feminism and misogyny represent the Illuminati freemasonry's hatred of women. Like communism and facism, they equal two seemingly opposite ends of the spectrum that have the same end result: the destruction of God's natural order.

Feminism is hatred toward women in that it causes women to lose their natural helpers and protectors (men) and causes men to either hate them and lose total respect for them or it turns men into "pussy" whipped little wimps, which are disgusting to most women and also of no value in the family sense or as a protector.

It turns women into androgynous, self-centered, hedonists, who end up hating themselves on the inside but who are easily controlled by their Illuminati mass propaganda handlers. As as woman who has been able to see the "big picture" from a young age, and was out exploring nature as soon as I could walk, rather than "holding a doll and singing to it for hours" (I've never known ANYone to do that btw), I've always searched out the truth one way or another.

I've also always been honest to the point of causing people to dislike or avoid me at times because, as you should know Henry, most people do NOT want to hear the truth. I'm not sexist toward men and I agree with God's natural order regarding men and women but as far as men being the "nobler more honorable and pure" of the species according to this article, I have to ask why then, is the world in the current condition it's in?

Lynn2 said (July 23, 2012):

And as far as women losing their beauty after 1 or 2 children, why is it that most of the men I see (in fact practically all of them) around here anyway, are bald or balding and look 9 months pregnant by the age of 28-30? And looks are not everything, what's on the inside of person is truly what counts (integrity). Why is it men are so vain where women are concerned? However, on that point, I've had two children, am 47 and still have my youthful figure, have no wrinkles on my face, my hair is long and silky, my breasts do not sag, I have no varicose veins or any of the other plagues of aging, big green eyes and I see 16 year old boys looking at me all the time. My husband is 10 years younger than me. I married him when I was 33 and he was 23. I actually look younger than him according to friends.

The man who wrote this article obviously hates women and finds them less than human and useful only as "breeders." It also sounds like he has hidden or repressed homosexual tendencies. Basically sounds like a big load of Freemasonic, misogynistic, Hegelian BUNK to me! "For ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God." Romans 3:23 I'm so glad Jesus Christ is neither a feminist or a misogynist!

Maureen said (July 23, 2012):

Jennifer has nailed it. Biology is a major factor in male and female "mistakes" and motives. Men's aggressive energy sets the rules of society, and women try to function within those rules.

When Christianity's superior moral demands and constraints on men's duties and responsibilities toward society and women and family life were deliberately undermined by the Playboy perverts and when women's contribution to family and society were ridiculed as inferior and "childlike" by the likes of the lifelong bachelors and whorehouse-visitors, Schopenhauer and Nietszche, the perennially precarious and vulnerable balance of male and female virtues was negatively affected.

Dan said (July 23, 2012):

I don't support the use of feminist nomenclature such as 'misogynist'. Keoni Galt placed a link quoting H.L. Menken "A mysogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate one another". A man that hates women actually fears them. Seeing her do her worst a self confident is amused. Shakespeare got it right in the Taming of the Shrew. Still, there's a truth in what Menken noticed, a confrontational thing that can happen between women when the same space, rank, social status or man is involved. Even Aliester Crowley mentioned it, in his poem to the feline goddess Seckhet,
"Shall it be claw or paw to-day, pussy, your lover-lion play?"

I think women actually get over this juvenile behavior after high school, though the behavior described may linger on in cases of arrested development.
I think it's a territorial nature that goes with the 'nesting' instinct.

Why Girls Hate Each Other

High school males used to get into fist fights over a girl. I don't think they do anymore.
That troubles me....the testosterone levels have definitely been altered during the last 50 years. Lookie here....

Why are levels of sperm in men falling ?

Estrogen havoc in women? One need look no further than the birth control pills 90% of women use ten to twenty years of their lives for half a century.

Dan said (July 23, 2012):

Jennifer said (July 23, 2012):

"Schopenhauer was talking about an era when the average man had morals and was stoic unlike today's immature hedonist brainwashed man who doesn't get mature until about 50 if ever."

She's right. That's exactly what I was thinking as I read the article.

Jennifer said (July 23, 2012):

Schopenhauer was talking about an era when the average man had morals and was stoic unlike today's immature hedonist brainwashed man who doesn't get mature until about 50 if ever.

But true, the nature of woman is to Love Children and that loving starts by loving the man via oxytocin bonding. Oxytocin picks the best DNA match via scent. Oxytocin is activated in a woman's brain via estrogen --men have oxytocin too but to such a small degree compared to women it is not a huge factor in their mating choices, and actions. Oxytocin's goal is to make women fall in love and TRUST a man by making her chemically high.

A woman completely loses the ability to discern if the man is worthy of being a good husband-provider /protector or not because oxytocin dumps twice as much dopamine into her as heroin. This makes her relax and feel so good that she will go into a fog of denial so that she can Believe in him so she can be "tricked" into having his child. In 20 seconds of smelling a man if he has the "right" DNA scent she will begin Trusting him! The man may be a zero but to her -he is a Hero -no matter what he does she will find a way to defend him.

Oxytocin does not care it is only choosing the best DNA match. That same Oxytocin causes her to LOVE her child --no matter what. God didn't take any chances he just designed women to automatically LOVE any child born to them and the beginning of that Love starts with Loving her sexual partner.

I believe that one of the reasons society created the Institution of Marriage is to protect the vulnerability of women. I've read men on this site blame women when they complain about picking men who turn out to be "bad apples." They say, "Well, its the woman's fault for not picking a good man." No its her father's fault for losing the understanding of his daughter's inability and vulnerability.

Something seemed to happen when fathers became obsessed with Playboy & Penthouse Magazines etc-- it regressed them and destroyed their brain's moral reasoning.

Society began changing and young women were abandoned to figure out and discern men for themselves which is an impossibility. Father's used to size up future son's-in-laws. And to help a daughter's fate, it was not beyond a father to threaten a man with violence and death.

My mother told me that her brother got a young woman pregnant and the pregnant woman's father saw to it that he married her and treated her right via the end of a shot gun. Men were kept in line by other older men.

Now a pregnant 22 year old is just sent to a clinic by her parents. Parents today think nothing of their daughters having sex with whoever and they think its good for them. Oxytocin is not completely understood but its my observation that women who have multiple partners it is eventually destroyed or greatly reduced.

Also The Pill, Anti-Depressants, Drugs and such interfere with the body's natural chemistry and distort and/or destroy Oxytocin.

Mary said (July 23, 2012):

Henry ,It would appear the Illuminists have won?



You can't trust ABC, the most Illuminati Jewish of the 3 networks

Len said (July 22, 2012):

Schopenhauer was, of course, a cynic and a pessimist, but he was also a brilliant mind and philosopher.

That said, I do not agree with his over-all indictment of women for it is entirely too severe.

Women, if they have a proper upbringing and some solid Christian values, have great insight into people
and relationships. They are generally more perceptive than men, tho often not as given to objectivity in many matters. Women also have far more empathy than most men. And empathy often translates into love and compassion.

Women should not be "adored," but *cherished*. There is a vital difference.

And they should be appreciated for the wonderful creatures they are, ... assuming they have not be completely destroyed and ruined by the NWO social engineers in our midst.

Keoni Galt said (July 22, 2012):

Misogyny is the key to male liberation from blue pill delusions. Only by embracing it, can men adopt a new paradigm in which the female of the human species has forever been knocked off of the pedestal that had been erected in our minds by institutionalized brainwashing and mass media programming.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at