Evo Morales just now in Mexico City: "If I've committed a crime, it's being Indigenous... it's implementing social programs for the poor and hungry. If I've committed a crime or a sin, our sin is being anti-imperialist."
And if you believe this, I have some swampland in Florida for sale...Marcos' article, Good Riddance Evo Morales elicited many complaints from people who have been duped by the false Left-Right Illuminati dichotomy. The central banking cartel uses the CIA to control both Left (Communism, globalism, satanism) and Right (Zionism, nationalism, tradition) in order to give the appearance of democratic freedom. Sure Communists like Morales throw some scraps to the poor while enriching himself and his buddies. But the real issue in Bolivia is whether US or Chinese corporations, not its people, will control its wealth.
Here are reminders that we already have de facto Communism. The central bank cartel controls all corporations and seeks to expand this control into tyranny over every aspect of our lives. Zionism must be considered false opposition [that is being used to set the stage for a third world war if necessary.]
Illuminati Insider Howard Wallace Rosenthal-
"We have been successful in dividing society against itself by pitting labor against management, This perhaps has been one of our greatest feats, since, in reality, it is a triangle, though only two points ever seem to occur. In a modern industry... capital, which force we represent, is the apex. Both management and labor are on the base of this triangle. They continually stand opposed to each other and their attention is never directed to the head of their problem."
"Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book credit, which we create from nothing to all local banks who are member banks. They, in turn, extend book credit to industry. Thus, we do more than God, for all of our wealth is created from nothing. You look shocked! Don't be! It's true, we actually do more than God."
"With this supposed capital we bring industry, management, and labor into our debt, which debt only increases and is never liquidated. Through this continual increase, we are able to pit management against labor so they will never unite and attack us and usher in a debt-free industrial Utopia."
Loeb banker Otto Kahn- "You say that Marxism is the very antithesis of capitalism, which is equally sacred to us. It is precisely for this reason that they are direct opposites to one another, that they put into our hands the two poles of this planet and allow us to be its axis. These two contraries, like Bolshevism and ourselves, find their identity in the International. [Presumably, he means the Comintern.]
"These opposites ... meet again in the identity of their purpose and end in the remaking of the world from above by the control of riches, and from below by revolution.
"Our mission consists in promulgating the new law and in creating a God, that is to say in purifying the idea of God and realizing it, when the time shall come. We shall purify the idea by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah. The advent of it will be facilitated by the final triumph of Israel...
"Our essential dynamism makes use of the forces of destruction and forces of creation but uses the first to nourish the second...Our organization for revolution is evidenced by destructive Bolshevism and for construction by the League of Nations which is also our work.
"Bolshevism is the accelerator and the League is the brake on the mechanism of which we supply both the motive force and the guiding power.
"What is the end? It is already determined by our mission. It is formed of elements scattered throughout the whole world, but cast in the flame of our faith in ourselves. We are a League of Nations which contains the elements of all others...Israel is the microcosm and the germ of the city of the future."
Our democracy and freedom are illusions. Power is too important to be left to the people.
Communists and Zionists are both Freemasons
Jewish billionaires fund both Left and Right
First Comment by Pablo
I just posted this comment on thesaker.is website in defense of your website's position. Because despite the Saker's often very well-informed and balanced geopolitical articles, I find his reaction to the (CIABlackwater) regime-change operation in Bolivia deeply disappointing: http://thesaker.is/a-few-short-comments-about-the-fascist-coup-in-bolivia/ I wonder how such an intelligent and geopolitical trained person could get this so wrong. Is he really so ignorant of the Global jMafia dialectics?
Dear Saker, could you please comment on the underneath linked article, because the j-Conspiracy denouncing Makow and his contributors are not precisely "Lovers" of the Neocon Empire, but still see Morales as what he really is. Makow and his contributors just seem to be able to look through the more subtle "Ab Chao Order Divide et Impera" strategy.
The problem, as you well know, is not just economical. To be left in economics, like the Soviets a hundred years ago, is just a facade for a quite different agenda. So too with Evo Morales and his likes, they are clearly Christ and Natural Law hating "cultural marxism" (God and man-hating lgbt, climate-religion, etc.) pawns. You have a sound Christian mind. So you perfectly understand what a pawn is !
Pure fake, but with an attractive facade for the pauperized peoples and nations, abused and smashed between a rock and a hard place, or rather Skylla and Charybdis, Left and Right, anti-Christian and fake-Christian... This said, no Christian or simply "humane" person could be on the "Empire's" side either.
We are neither on the "Solve" nor on the "Coagula" side, neither "here" nor "there" as the Lord, the God-man has warned us: Good Riddance Evo Morales https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/11/good-riddance-evo-morales.html
The strategy your excellent article exposes is called Hegelian dialectics. We have a thesis (capitalism) and antithesis (marxism), leading to synthesis (new world order). There has never been benevolent marxism anywhere. The same can be said about capitalism. The elite makes sure that every socialist leader is corrupt to the core and that he only distributes crumbs to the poor, like Lula in Brazil, who benefited mostly billionaires. In the same way, free market, true competition, meritocracy and absence of state-sponsored monopolies and oligopolies don't exist anywhere, not even in so-called capitalist countries like the US. What we have is a mix of the worse.
China is the model: cultural marxism and social controls for the masses, destruction of traditional values and crony capitalist gains for the elite. Marxism is necessary for all in order to destroy cultural values such as race, religion, and nationalism and make control easier to be maintained. Capitalism is necessary to create wealth, for the elite loves money. However, and this is important to understand our situation today, there is a difference in the way this dialectics is applied, depending on the level of development of the country.
In industrial, developed countries that became rich with capitalism, they use war to create misery and therefore a need to "help the poor", that will eventually brew socialism. That's Europe.
In the United States, it's more difficult, but they have pushed racial hatred and now the extreme concentration of wealth (pushed by government policies).
In the Third World, they implement marxism over a semi-feudal archaic structure and make daily life so wretched and miserable, corruption so widespread, that any free-market economics initiative is seen as salvation. That's one of the reasons American and European kids like socialism and don't understand why Latin Americans hate it.
Their version of soft socialism is built over a base of capitalist prosperity. It's not the same thing as being a Latin American citizen getting US$ 29 in government dole, having no future at all, your life destroyed, while you see the Marxist elite flying in private jets. Venezuela is not Sweden, even though both countries call themselves "socialist".
Venezuela is richer in resources, but Sweden was built on capitalism and still has a capitalist economy. Until public debt implodes the country, it's nice to be a Sweden leftist. Gradually, these two different paths will converge. The dole will get bigger eventually (see Andrew Yang's Universal Basic Income BS), Europe and the US will go broke, cultural marxism will dominate the First World, while market reforms will happen in poor countries raising economic standards (Marxist economy simply doesn't work). The world will become more homogeneous and we will all become happy Chinese slaves.